Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AOSL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOSL | $38.61 | -5.90% | 1.2B | -10.72 | -$3.60 | N/A |
| NVDA | $200.42 | -3.73% | 4.9T | 30.63 | $6.54 | +0.14% |
| TSM | $408.75 | -4.48% | 2.1T | 35.10 | $11.65 | +0.78% |
| AVGO | $372.10 | -5.12% | 1.8T | 61.65 | $6.03 | +0.67% |
| MU | $891.88 | -4.70% | 1T | 42.13 | $21.17 | +0.06% |
| AMD | $452.40 | -4.86% | 737.3B | 150.73 | $3.00 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,734.19 | -2.45% | 668B | 58.03 | $29.87 | +0.50% |
| INTC | $107.04 | -0.82% | 538B | -178.40 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| LRCX | $321.80 | -1.64% | 402.4B | 60.95 | $5.28 | +0.32% |
| AMAT | $497.01 | -0.44% | 394.6B | 46.76 | $10.63 | +0.38% |
Stock Comparison
AOSL vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.9T. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while NVDA trades at $200.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check NVDA's competition here
AOSL vs TSM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while TSM trades at $408.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check TSM's competition here
AOSL vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while AVGO trades at $372.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 61.65. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check AVGO's competition here
AOSL vs MU Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while MU trades at $891.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 42.13. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check MU's competition here
AOSL vs AMD Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 737.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while AMD trades at $452.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 150.73. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check AMD's competition here
AOSL vs ASML Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 668B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ASML trades at $1,734.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 58.03. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ASML's competition here
AOSL vs INTC Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 538B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while INTC trades at $107.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -178.40. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check INTC's competition here
AOSL vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 402.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while LRCX trades at $321.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 60.95. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check LRCX's competition here
AOSL vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 394.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while AMAT trades at $497.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 46.76. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check AMAT's competition here
AOSL vs ARM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 327B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ARM trades at $307.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 357.38. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ARM's competition here
AOSL vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 279B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while KLAC trades at $2,135.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 60.67. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check KLAC's competition here
AOSL vs TXN Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 256.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while TXN trades at $282.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 48.61. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check TXN's competition here
AOSL vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 221B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while MRVL trades at $252.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 86.80. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check MRVL's competition here
AOSL vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 201.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while QCOM trades at $191.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check QCOM's competition here
AOSL vs ADI Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 191.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ADI trades at $392.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 58.40. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ADI's competition here
AOSL vs ASX Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ASX trades at $34.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ASX's competition here
AOSL vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while MPWR trades at $1,473.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 104.99. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check MPWR's competition here
AOSL vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while NXPI trades at $285.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check NXPI's competition here
AOSL vs STM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while STM trades at $70.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 442.12. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check STM's competition here
AOSL vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ALAB trades at $330.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 224.84. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ALAB's competition here
AOSL vs TER Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while TER trades at $347.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 64.35. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check TER's competition here
AOSL vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while CBRS trades at $237.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 551.93. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check CBRS's competition here
AOSL vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while MCHP trades at $87.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 399.59. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check MCHP's competition here
AOSL vs UMC Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while UMC trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check UMC's competition here
AOSL vs ON Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ON trades at $110.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 81.50. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ON's competition here
AOSL vs GFS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while GFS trades at $74.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 50.55. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check GFS's competition here
AOSL vs Q Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while Q trades at $139.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 45.05. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check Q's competition here
AOSL vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while MTSI trades at $354.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 150.81. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check MTSI's competition here
AOSL vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while TSEM trades at $233.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 104.73. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check TSEM's competition here
AOSL vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ENTG trades at $128.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 74.50. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ENTG's competition here
AOSL vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while LSCC trades at $132.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 945.50. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check LSCC's competition here
AOSL vs SITM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while SITM trades at $664.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -706.63. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check SITM's competition here
AOSL vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while AMKR trades at $69.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check AMKR's competition here
AOSL vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while NVMI trades at $508.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 63.70. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check NVMI's competition here
AOSL vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while RMBS trades at $138.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 65.77. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check RMBS's competition here
AOSL vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while SMTC trades at $154.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -376.29. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check SMTC's competition here
AOSL vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while AAOI trades at $175.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -269.25. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check AAOI's competition here
AOSL vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ONTO trades at $269.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 125.78. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ONTO's competition here
AOSL vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while SWKS trades at $70.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check SWKS's competition here
AOSL vs CREE Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check CREE's competition here
AOSL vs FORM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while FORM trades at $115.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 133.11. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check FORM's competition here
AOSL vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while SIMO trades at $251.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 49.84. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check SIMO's competition here
AOSL vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while QRVO trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check QRVO's competition here
AOSL vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ALGM trades at $44.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -556.62. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ALGM's competition here
AOSL vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while CRUS trades at $157.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check CRUS's competition here
AOSL vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check BRKS's competition here
AOSL vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while CAMT trades at $166.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 170.09. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check CAMT's competition here
AOSL vs VSH Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while VSH trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 5461.00. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check VSH's competition here
AOSL vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while SLAB trades at $217.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -142.41. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check SLAB's competition here
AOSL vs MXL Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while MXL trades at $71.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -47.34. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check MXL's competition here
AOSL vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while KLIC trades at $102.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 99.06. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check KLIC's competition here
AOSL vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ACMR trades at $79.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 60.97. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ACMR's competition here
AOSL vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while SYNA trades at $128.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -103.06. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check SYNA's competition here
AOSL vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while NVTS trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -32.54. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check NVTS's competition here
AOSL vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ACLS trades at $157.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 48.97. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ACLS's competition here
AOSL vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while DIOD trades at $100.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 54.89. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check DIOD's competition here
AOSL vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while IPGP trades at $104.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 153.04. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check IPGP's competition here
AOSL vs POWI Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while POWI trades at $74.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 248.77. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check POWI's competition here
AOSL vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while UCTT trades at $90.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.19. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check UCTT's competition here
AOSL vs VECO Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while VECO trades at $65.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 173.53. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check VECO's competition here
AOSL vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while AXTI trades at $85.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -266.53. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check AXTI's competition here
AOSL vs PI Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while PI trades at $122.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -136.32. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check PI's competition here
AOSL vs LASR Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while LASR trades at $62.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -209.00. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check LASR's competition here
AOSL vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while AEHR trades at $93.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -245.26. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check AEHR's competition here
AOSL vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while HIMX trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 85.42. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check HIMX's competition here
AOSL vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while AMBA trades at $62.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -38.88. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check AMBA's competition here
AOSL vs COHU Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while COHU trades at $54.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -45.77. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check COHU's competition here
AOSL vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ICHR trades at $72.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -48.76. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ICHR's competition here
AOSL vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while WOLF trades at $43.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check WOLF's competition here
AOSL vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while IMOS trades at $55.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 69.77. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check IMOS's competition here
AOSL vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while SKYT trades at $34.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check SKYT's competition here
AOSL vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while PLAB trades at $28.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check PLAB's competition here
AOSL vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while AMBQ trades at $75.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check AMBQ's competition here
AOSL vs AIP Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while AIP trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -42.44. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check AIP's competition here
AOSL vs POET Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while POET trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -13.07. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check POET's competition here
AOSL vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while CEVA trades at $41.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -89.20. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check CEVA's competition here
AOSL vs SGH Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check SGH's competition here
AOSL vs INDI Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 832.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while INDI trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check INDI's competition here
AOSL vs QNC Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 607.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while QNC trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check QNC's competition here
AOSL vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 536M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while MRAM trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2286.00. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check MRAM's competition here
AOSL vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 506.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while NVEC trades at $104.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 33.34. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check NVEC's competition here
AOSL vs VLN-WT Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 471.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while VLN-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check VLN-WT's competition here
AOSL vs LAES Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 433.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while LAES trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check LAES's competition here
AOSL vs XPER Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 364.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while XPER trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check XPER's competition here
AOSL vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 347.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while QUIK trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -26.13. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check QUIK's competition here
AOSL vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check TGAN's competition here
AOSL vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ALMU trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -63.71. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ALMU's competition here
AOSL vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ASYS trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 107.22. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ASYS's competition here
AOSL vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 260.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ATOM trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -12.32. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ATOM's competition here
AOSL vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 232.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while GSIT trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -17.36. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check GSIT's competition here
AOSL vs MX Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 221.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while MX trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check MX's competition here
AOSL vs VLN Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 220.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while VLN trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check VLN's competition here
AOSL vs INTT Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 194.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while INTT trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 387.25. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check INTT's competition here
AOSL vs BZAIW Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BZAIW has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while BZAIW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas BZAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BZAIW's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to BZAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check BZAIW's competition here
AOSL vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 168.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while BZAI trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check BZAI's competition here
AOSL vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check OIIM's competition here
AOSL vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 141.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while GCTS trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check GCTS's competition here
AOSL vs NA Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while NA trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check NA's competition here
AOSL vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
AOSL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AOSL stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AOSL is priced at $38.61, while ARBE trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AOSL currently has a P/E ratio of -10.72, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, AOSL's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AOSL is more volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AOSL.Check ARBE's competition here