AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AZN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - General Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZN | $180.88 | -0.37% | 284.4B | 27.61 | $6.64 | +1.74% |
| LLY | $1,164.30 | +1.32% | 1.1T | 40.61 | $28.17 | +0.56% |
| JNJ | $239.85 | +3.31% | 570.7B | 27.44 | $8.64 | +2.21% |
| ABBV | $226.78 | +1.66% | 398.2B | 109.93 | $2.05 | +2.98% |
| MRK | $118.90 | -0.52% | 295.3B | 33.68 | $3.55 | +2.76% |
| NVS | $149.57 | +2.15% | 284.5B | 21.36 | $6.98 | +3.17% |
| AMGN | $347.42 | +0.49% | 186B | 23.98 | $14.37 | +2.85% |
| GILD | $122.90 | -4.06% | 155.8B | 14.99 | $8.37 | +2.54% |
| PFE | $25.78 | +0.62% | 146.3B | 19.60 | $1.31 | +6.68% |
| BMY | $56.42 | +1.53% | 115.3B | 15.82 | $3.57 | +4.43% |
Stock Comparison
AZN vs LLY Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, LLY has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while LLY trades at $1,164.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas LLY's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LLY's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to LLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check LLY's competition here
AZN vs JNJ Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, JNJ has a market cap of 570.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while JNJ trades at $239.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas JNJ's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JNJ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to JNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check JNJ's competition here
AZN vs ABBV Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, ABBV has a market cap of 398.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while ABBV trades at $226.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas ABBV's P/E ratio is 109.93. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ABBV's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to ABBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check ABBV's competition here
AZN vs MRK Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, MRK has a market cap of 295.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while MRK trades at $118.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas MRK's P/E ratio is 33.68. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MRK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to MRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check MRK's competition here
AZN vs NVS Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, NVS has a market cap of 284.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while NVS trades at $149.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas NVS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NVS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is more volatile compared to NVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check NVS's competition here
AZN vs AMGN Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, AMGN has a market cap of 186B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while AMGN trades at $347.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas AMGN's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AMGN's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to AMGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check AMGN's competition here
AZN vs GILD Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, GILD has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while GILD trades at $122.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas GILD's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GILD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to GILD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check GILD's competition here
AZN vs PFE Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, PFE has a market cap of 146.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while PFE trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas PFE's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PFE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is more volatile compared to PFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check PFE's competition here
AZN vs BMY Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, BMY has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while BMY trades at $56.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas BMY's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BMY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is more volatile compared to BMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check BMY's competition here
AZN vs SNY Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, SNY has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while SNY trades at $44.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas SNY's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to SNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check SNY's competition here
AZN vs GSK Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, GSK has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while GSK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas GSK's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GSK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is more volatile compared to GSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check GSK's competition here
AZN vs ZTS Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, ZTS has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while ZTS trades at $82.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas ZTS's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZTS's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to ZTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check ZTS's competition here
AZN vs BIIB Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, BIIB has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while BIIB trades at $198.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas BIIB's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BIIB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to BIIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check BIIB's competition here
AZN vs HZNP Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, HZNP has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while HZNP trades at $116.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas HZNP's P/E ratio is 61.86. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HZNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is more volatile compared to HZNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check HZNP's competition here
AZN vs GRFS Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, GRFS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while GRFS trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas GRFS's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRFS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to GRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check GRFS's competition here
AZN vs OGN Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, OGN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while OGN trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas OGN's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OGN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is more volatile compared to OGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check OGN's competition here
AZN vs CELG-RI Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, CELG-RI has a market cap of 219.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while CELG-RI trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas CELG-RI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CELG-RI's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to CELG-RI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check CELG-RI's competition here
AZN vs CTOR Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, CTOR has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while CTOR trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas CTOR's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTOR's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to CTOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check CTOR's competition here
AZN vs SCLX Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, SCLX has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while SCLX trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas SCLX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCLX's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to SCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check SCLX's competition here
AZN vs MIRA Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, MIRA has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while MIRA trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas MIRA's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MIRA's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to MIRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check MIRA's competition here
AZN vs SRXH Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, SRXH has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while SRXH trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas SRXH's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SRXH's ROE of +8.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to SRXH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check SRXH's competition here
AZN vs SCLXW Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, SCLXW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while SCLXW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas SCLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCLXW's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to SCLXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check SCLXW's competition here
AZN vs CRXT Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, CRXT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while CRXT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas CRXT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRXT's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to CRXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check CRXT's competition here
AZN vs BDSIW Comparison June 2026
AZN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AZN stands at 284.4B. In comparison, BDSIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AZN is priced at $180.88, while BDSIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AZN currently has a P/E ratio of 27.61, whereas BDSIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AZN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BDSIW's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, AZN is less volatile compared to BDSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AZN.Check BDSIW's competition here