CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | $45.11 | +4.17% | 11.9B | 9.83 | $4.47 | +8.88% |
| CB | $333.16 | +3.50% | 126.1B | 11.50 | $28.26 | +1.20% |
| PGR | $205.04 | +2.39% | 116.9B | 10.17 | $19.67 | +6.96% |
| TRV | $305.49 | +2.95% | 63.8B | 8.96 | $33.50 | +1.47% |
| ALL | $224.82 | +4.56% | 55.9B | 4.80 | $45.20 | +1.92% |
| ALL-PI | $18.60 | -0.05% | 55.4B | 1.55 | $12.04 | +1.92% |
| ALL-PJ | $25.96 | -0.36% | 55.3B | N/A | N/A | +1.92% |
| ALL-PB | $25.89 | +0.25% | 53.9B | 2.15 | $12.04 | +1.92% |
| ALL-PH | $19.97 | +0.38% | 49.6B | 3.38 | $5.90 | +1.92% |
| HIG | $131.26 | +2.88% | 35.3B | 9.07 | $14.21 | +1.80% |
Stock Comparison
CNA vs CB Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while CB trades at $333.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check CB's competition here
CNA vs PGR Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 116.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while PGR trades at $205.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check PGR's competition here
CNA vs TRV Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while TRV trades at $305.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check TRV's competition here
CNA vs ALL Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ALL trades at $224.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ALL's competition here
CNA vs ALL-PI Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ALL-PI trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ALL-PI's competition here
CNA vs ALL-PJ Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ALL-PJ trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ALL-PJ's competition here
CNA vs ALL-PB Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ALL-PB trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ALL-PB's competition here
CNA vs ALL-PH Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ALL-PH trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ALL-PH's competition here
CNA vs HIG Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HIG has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while HIG trades at $131.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas HIG's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to HIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check HIG's competition here
CNA vs ALL-PG Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ALL-PG's competition here
CNA vs CINF Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while CINF trades at $167.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check CINF's competition here
CNA vs WRB Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while WRB trades at $68.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check WRB's competition here
CNA vs WRB-PH Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while WRB-PH trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check WRB-PH's competition here
CNA vs MKL Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while MKL trades at $1,849.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check MKL's competition here
CNA vs L Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while L trades at $109.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas L's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check L's competition here
CNA vs HIG-PG Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HIG-PG has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while HIG-PG trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas HIG-PG's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIG-PG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to HIG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check HIG-PG's competition here
CNA vs AFG Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AFG trades at $134.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AFG's competition here
CNA vs WRB-PE Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while WRB-PE trades at $21.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check WRB-PE's competition here
CNA vs AXS Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AXS trades at $100.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AXS's competition here
CNA vs WRB-PF Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WRB-PF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while WRB-PF trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas WRB-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRB-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to WRB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check WRB-PF's competition here
CNA vs AXS-PE Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AXS-PE trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AXS-PE's competition here
CNA vs KNSL Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while KNSL trades at $313.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check KNSL's competition here
CNA vs THG Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while THG trades at $197.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check THG's competition here
CNA vs WRB-PG Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while WRB-PG trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check WRB-PG's competition here
CNA vs MCY Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while MCY trades at $103.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check MCY's competition here
CNA vs SIGI Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while SIGI trades at $91.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check SIGI's competition here
CNA vs WTM Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while WTM trades at $2,035.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check WTM's competition here
CNA vs RLI Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while RLI trades at $54.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check RLI's competition here
CNA vs LMND Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while LMND trades at $59.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -28.04. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check LMND's competition here
CNA vs HGTY Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while HGTY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 44.38. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check HGTY's competition here
CNA vs HGTY-WT Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check HGTY-WT's competition here
CNA vs AHL Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AHL trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AHL's competition here
CNA vs PLMR Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while PLMR trades at $113.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check PLMR's competition here
CNA vs AHL-PD Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AHL-PD trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -80.04. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AHL-PD's competition here
CNA vs STC Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while STC trades at $67.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check STC's competition here
CNA vs HCI Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while HCI trades at $161.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check HCI's competition here
CNA vs HMN Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while HMN trades at $48.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check HMN's competition here
CNA vs SLDE Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SLDE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while SLDE trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas SLDE's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLDE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to SLDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check SLDE's competition here
CNA vs SKWD Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while SKWD trades at $49.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check SKWD's competition here
CNA vs AHL-PE Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AHL-PE trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -80.85. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AHL-PE's competition here
CNA vs AFGB Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AFGB trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AFGB's competition here
CNA vs AFGD Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AFGD trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AFGD's competition here
CNA vs AFGC Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AFGC trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AFGC's competition here
CNA vs KMPR Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while KMPR trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check KMPR's competition here
CNA vs KMPB Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while KMPB trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check KMPB's competition here
CNA vs AFGE Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AFGE trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AFGE's competition here
CNA vs PRA Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while PRA trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check PRA's competition here
CNA vs UFCS Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while UFCS trades at $48.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check UFCS's competition here
CNA vs ARGO Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARGO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ARGO's competition here
CNA vs UVE Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while UVE trades at $38.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check UVE's competition here
CNA vs SAFT Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while SAFT trades at $72.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check SAFT's competition here
CNA vs MHLA Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while MHLA trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check MHLA's competition here
CNA vs ASIC Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ASIC has a market cap of 997.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ASIC trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ASIC's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to ASIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ASIC's competition here
CNA vs SIGIP Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 965.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while SIGIP trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check SIGIP's competition here
CNA vs BOW Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 859.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while BOW trades at $27.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check BOW's competition here
CNA vs ROOT Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 755M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ROOT trades at $55.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ROOT's competition here
CNA vs DGICB Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 669.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while DGICB trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check DGICB's competition here
CNA vs HRTG Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 656.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while HRTG trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 3.32. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check HRTG's competition here
CNA vs DGICA Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while DGICA trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check DGICA's competition here
CNA vs ACIC Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ACIC trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACIC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ACIC's competition here
CNA vs GBLI Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while GBLI trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check GBLI's competition here
CNA vs UIHC Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check UIHC's competition here
CNA vs AII Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 328.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AII trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AII's competition here
CNA vs NODK Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 311.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while NODK trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is -72.43. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NODK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check NODK's competition here
CNA vs PRHIZ Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PRHIZ has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while PRHIZ trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas PRHIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRHIZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to PRHIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check PRHIZ's competition here
CNA vs KINS Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 228.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while KINS trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check KINS's competition here
CNA vs CNFR Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while CNFR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNFR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check CNFR's competition here
CNA vs CNFRZ Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while CNFRZ trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check CNFRZ's competition here
CNA vs PRHI Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PRHI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while PRHI trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas PRHI's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRHI's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to PRHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check PRHI's competition here
CNA vs UNAM Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check UNAM's competition here
CNA vs HALL Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 145.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while HALL trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check HALL's competition here
CNA vs ARGO-PA Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 331. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ARGO-PA's competition here
CNA vs AHL-PC Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AHL-PC's competition here
CNA vs FNHC Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check FNHC's competition here
CNA vs NSEC Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check NSEC's competition here
CNA vs AFSI Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AFSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AFSI trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AFSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to AFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AFSI's competition here
CNA vs GBLIL Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GBLIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while GBLIL trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas GBLIL's P/E ratio is -26.06. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBLIL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to GBLIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check GBLIL's competition here
CNA vs MILEW Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check MILEW's competition here
CNA vs ENH Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ENH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while ENH trades at $92.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas ENH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to ENH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check ENH's competition here
CNA vs GFZ Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GFZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while GFZ trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas GFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to GFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check GFZ's competition here
CNA vs AFHBL Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check AFHBL's competition here
CNA vs Y Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check Y's competition here
CNA vs MILE Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check MILE's competition here
CNA vs CNFRL Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CNFRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while CNFRL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas CNFRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNFRL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is less volatile compared to CNFRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check CNFRL's competition here
CNA vs STFC Comparison June 2026
CNA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNA stands at 11.9B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNA is priced at $45.11, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.83, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, CNA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNA is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNA.Check STFC's competition here