Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAT | $150.83 | +3.21% | 6.5B | 14.70 | $10.26 | N/A |
| MCD | $282.25 | +1.61% | 200.5B | 23.24 | $12.14 | +2.60% |
| SBUX | $97.41 | +2.73% | 111B | 74.33 | $1.31 | +2.54% |
| YUM | $151.63 | +2.89% | 41.8B | 24.46 | $6.20 | +1.93% |
| CMG | $29.88 | +2.08% | 38.3B | 27.41 | $1.09 | N/A |
| QSR | $72.67 | +1.64% | 25.2B | 23.37 | $3.11 | +3.45% |
| DRI | $200.91 | +2.51% | 23B | 21.15 | $9.49 | +3.00% |
| YUMC | $42.72 | +0.92% | 15B | 17.22 | $2.48 | +2.48% |
| TXRH | $164.00 | -2.25% | 10.8B | 26.16 | $6.27 | +1.74% |
| DPZ | $317.69 | +1.33% | 10.6B | 18.30 | $17.36 | +2.28% |
Stock Comparison
EAT vs MCD Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 200.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while MCD trades at $282.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MCD's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MCD's competition here
EAT vs SBUX Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 111B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while SBUX trades at $97.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 74.33. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SBUX's competition here
EAT vs YUM Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while YUM trades at $151.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUM's competition here
EAT vs CMG Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while CMG trades at $29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CMG's competition here
EAT vs QSR Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while QSR trades at $72.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check QSR's competition here
EAT vs DRI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while DRI trades at $200.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DRI's competition here
EAT vs YUMC Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while YUMC trades at $42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUMC's competition here
EAT vs TXRH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while TXRH trades at $164.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TXRH's competition here
EAT vs DPZ Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while DPZ trades at $317.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DPZ's competition here
EAT vs BROS Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BROS trades at $57.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 90.30. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BROS's competition here
EAT vs CAVA Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while CAVA trades at $76.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 146.67. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAVA's competition here
EAT vs WING Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while WING trades at $143.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 35.52. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WING's competition here
EAT vs CAKE Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while CAKE trades at $67.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAKE's competition here
EAT vs SHAK Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while SHAK trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 54.89. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SHAK's competition here
EAT vs ARCO Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while ARCO trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARCO's competition here
EAT vs WEN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while WEN trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WEN's competition here
EAT vs PZZA Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while PZZA trades at $31.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PZZA's competition here
EAT vs BH-A Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 971.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BH-A trades at $1,640.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -22.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH-A's competition here
EAT vs BJRI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 959M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BJRI trades at $45.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BJRI's competition here
EAT vs BH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 955.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BH trades at $304.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -20.78. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH's competition here
EAT vs SG Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 950M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while SG trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas SG's P/E ratio is 66.63. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SG's competition here
EAT vs TWNPV Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNPV's competition here
EAT vs CBRL Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 811.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while CBRL trades at $36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is -181.50. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CBRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CBRL's competition here
EAT vs HDL Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 770.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while HDL trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HDL's competition here
EAT vs CNNE Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 745.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while CNNE trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CNNE's competition here
EAT vs RUTH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RUTH's competition here
EAT vs CHUY Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHUY's competition here
EAT vs BLMN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 636.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BLMN trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BLMN's competition here
EAT vs FWRG Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 632.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while FWRG trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FWRG's competition here
EAT vs KRUS Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 538.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while KRUS trades at $44.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -295.73. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check KRUS's competition here
EAT vs PBPB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PBPB's competition here
EAT vs TAST Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TAST's competition here
EAT vs LOCO Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 439.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while LOCO trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LOCO's competition here
EAT vs NATH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while NATH trades at $101.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NATH's competition here
EAT vs DIN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 398.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while DIN trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DIN's competition here
EAT vs DENN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DENN's competition here
EAT vs PTLO Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while PTLO trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PTLO's competition here
EAT vs JACK Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 228.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while JACK trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to JACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check JACK's competition here
EAT vs FRGI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FRGI's competition here
EAT vs RICK Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 194.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while RICK trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is -32.68. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RICK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RICK's competition here
EAT vs BBQ Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BBQ's competition here
EAT vs VENU Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 141.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while VENU trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check VENU's competition here
EAT vs BYN-WT Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BYN-WT has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BYN-WT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BYN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BYN-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BYN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BYN-WT's competition here
EAT vs MB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while MB trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -16.35. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MB's competition here
EAT vs THCHW Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCHW's competition here
EAT vs RRGB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while RRGB trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RRGB's competition here
EAT vs NDLS Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while NDLS trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NDLS's competition here
EAT vs HCHL Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while HCHL trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -31.15. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HCHL's competition here
EAT vs BDL Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BDL trades at $36.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BDL's competition here
EAT vs GENK Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while GENK trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GENK's competition here
EAT vs STKS Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while STKS trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check STKS's competition here
EAT vs THCH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while THCH trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCH's competition here
EAT vs GRIL Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GRIL's competition here
EAT vs FATAV Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATAV's competition here
EAT vs RAVE Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while RAVE trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RAVE's competition here
EAT vs FATBW Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBW's competition here
EAT vs PC Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PC's competition here
EAT vs MYT Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MYT's competition here
EAT vs ARKR Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while ARKR trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARKR's competition here
EAT vs FATBB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while FATBB trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBB's competition here
EAT vs GTIM Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while GTIM trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GTIM's competition here
EAT vs YOSH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YOSH's competition here
EAT vs REBN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while REBN trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to REBN's ROE of -16.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check REBN's competition here
EAT vs BTBD Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BTBD trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBD's competition here
EAT vs BTB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTB's competition here
EAT vs FATBV Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBV's competition here
EAT vs TWNP Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNP's competition here
EAT vs FAT Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while FAT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FAT's competition here
EAT vs BFI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFI's competition here
EAT vs PNST Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while PNST trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PNST's competition here
EAT vs FATBP Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while FATBP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBP's competition here
EAT vs BTBDW Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 338.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BTBDW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBDW's competition here
EAT vs BFIIW Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFIIW's competition here
EAT vs CHSN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 12.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while CHSN trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CHSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHSN's competition here
EAT vs ONDR Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ONDR's competition here
EAT vs LUB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LUB's competition here
EAT vs BOJA Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BOJA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BOJA trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BOJA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BOJA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BOJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BOJA's competition here
EAT vs SONC Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SONC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while SONC trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas SONC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SONC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to SONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SONC's competition here
EAT vs ZOES Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ZOES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while ZOES trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas ZOES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ZOES's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ZOES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ZOES's competition here
EAT vs COSI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, COSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while COSI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas COSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to COSI's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to COSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check COSI's competition here
EAT vs BWLD Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BWLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BWLD trades at $156.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BWLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BWLD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BWLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BWLD's competition here
EAT vs PNRA Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PNRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while PNRA trades at $314.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas PNRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PNRA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PNRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PNRA's competition here
EAT vs PLKI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PLKI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while PLKI trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas PLKI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PLKI's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PLKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PLKI's competition here
EAT vs JMBA Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, JMBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while JMBA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas JMBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to JMBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to JMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check JMBA's competition here
EAT vs BOBE Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BOBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $150.83, while BOBE trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 14.70, whereas BOBE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BOBE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BOBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BOBE's competition here