Elite Express Holding Inc. (ETS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ETS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Trucking Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETS | $0.62 | +13.35% | 9.2M | -4.23 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| ODFL | $238.86 | -3.30% | 51.7B | 51.93 | $4.79 | +0.46% |
| TFII | $153.35 | -6.13% | 13.1B | 44.37 | $3.59 | +1.15% |
| KNX | $80.32 | -0.48% | 13.1B | 382.52 | $0.21 | +0.94% |
| SAIA | $469.77 | -2.27% | 12.8B | 50.40 | $9.51 | N/A |
| SNDR | $37.66 | -2.84% | 6.7B | 67.88 | $0.56 | +1.01% |
| RXO | $29.14 | +3.81% | 4.8B | -46.94 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| ARCB | $168.06 | +1.11% | 3.9B | 71.28 | $2.43 | +0.28% |
| WERN | $42.99 | -3.41% | 2.6B | -290.00 | -$0.15 | +1.28% |
| MRTN | $17.93 | -0.87% | 1.5B | 100.17 | $0.18 | +1.32% |
Stock Comparison
ETS vs ODFL Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ODFL has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while ODFL trades at $238.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas ODFL's P/E ratio is 51.93. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ODFL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ODFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ODFL's competition here
ETS vs TFII Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TFII has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while TFII trades at $153.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas TFII's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TFII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to TFII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TFII's competition here
ETS vs KNX Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, KNX has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while KNX trades at $80.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas KNX's P/E ratio is 382.52. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to KNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check KNX's competition here
ETS vs SAIA Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SAIA has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while SAIA trades at $469.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas SAIA's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SAIA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to SAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SAIA's competition here
ETS vs SNDR Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SNDR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while SNDR trades at $37.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas SNDR's P/E ratio is 67.88. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SNDR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to SNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SNDR's competition here
ETS vs RXO Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, RXO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while RXO trades at $29.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas RXO's P/E ratio is -46.94. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RXO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to RXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check RXO's competition here
ETS vs ARCB Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ARCB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while ARCB trades at $168.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas ARCB's P/E ratio is 71.28. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ARCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ARCB's competition here
ETS vs WERN Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, WERN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while WERN trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas WERN's P/E ratio is -290.00. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WERN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to WERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check WERN's competition here
ETS vs MRTN Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, MRTN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while MRTN trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas MRTN's P/E ratio is 100.17. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MRTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to MRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check MRTN's competition here
ETS vs HTLD Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, HTLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while HTLD trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas HTLD's P/E ratio is -29.11. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HTLD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to HTLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check HTLD's competition here
ETS vs CVLG Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, CVLG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while CVLG trades at $45.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas CVLG's P/E ratio is 499.56. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CVLG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to CVLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check CVLG's competition here
ETS vs ULH Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ULH has a market cap of 480.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while ULH trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas ULH's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ULH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ULH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ULH's competition here
ETS vs PTSI Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PTSI has a market cap of 429.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while PTSI trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas PTSI's P/E ratio is -164.33. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PTSI's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PTSI's competition here
ETS vs DSKE Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, DSKE has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while DSKE trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas DSKE's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSKE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to DSKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check DSKE's competition here
ETS vs USX Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, USX has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while USX trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas USX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to USX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check USX's competition here
ETS vs PAMT Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PAMT has a market cap of 295.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while PAMT trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas PAMT's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PAMT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PAMT's competition here
ETS vs PATI Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PATI has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while PATI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas PATI's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PATI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PATI's competition here
ETS vs TSP Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TSP has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while TSP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas TSP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TSP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to TSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TSP's competition here
ETS vs YELL Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, YELL has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while YELL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas YELL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YELL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to YELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check YELL's competition here
ETS vs BEST Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, BEST has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while BEST trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas BEST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BEST's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to BEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check BEST's competition here
ETS vs SLGB Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SLGB has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while SLGB trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas SLGB's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLGB's ROE of -7672.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to SLGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SLGB's competition here
ETS vs TOPP Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TOPP has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while TOPP trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas TOPP's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TOPP's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to TOPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TOPP's competition here
ETS vs HXHX Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while HXHX trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HXHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check HXHX's competition here
ETS vs YGMZ Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 11K. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while YGMZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check YGMZ's competition here
ETS vs AXPW Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, AXPW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while AXPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas AXPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AXPW's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to AXPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check AXPW's competition here
ETS vs DSKEW Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, DSKEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while DSKEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas DSKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSKEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to DSKEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check DSKEW's competition here
ETS vs USAK Comparison June 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 9.2M. In comparison, USAK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.62, while USAK trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.23, whereas USAK's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.20%, compared to USAK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to USAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check USAK's competition here