Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 260.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while IBM trades at $277.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check IBM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while ACN trades at $173.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check ACN's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while INFY trades at $12.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check INFY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while FI trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check FI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CTSH trades at $52.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CTSH's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while WIT trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check WIT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while FIS trades at $39.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check FIS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while BR trades at $150.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check BR's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CDW trades at $133.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CDW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while LDOS trades at $123.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check LDOS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while GIB trades at $67.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GIB's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while AUR trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check AUR's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while APLD trades at $41.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -110.29. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check APLD's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CACI trades at $525.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CACI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while JKHY trades at $127.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check JKHY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while GDS trades at $36.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GDS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while INGM trades at $29.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check INGM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while G trades at $32.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas G's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check G's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while DLB trades at $54.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check DLB's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while EPAM trades at $95.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check EPAM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while SAIC trades at $114.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SAIC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while EXLS trades at $29.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check EXLS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check PSFE-WT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check NCR's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while WAY trades at $19.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check WAY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while WNS trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check WNS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while KEEL trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check KEEL's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while INOD trades at $98.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 88.19. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check INOD's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check PRFT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while PAY trades at $21.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check PAY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while VNET trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check VNET's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while KD trades at $11.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check KD's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while NIQ trades at $8.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check NIQ's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while NYAX trades at $64.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 81.33. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check NYAX's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while FORTY trades at $121.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check FORTY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while FLYW trades at $14.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 58.88. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check FLYW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CNXC trades at $27.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CNXC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while GLOB trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GLOB's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CLVT trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CLVT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while AI trades at $10.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check AI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TWKS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while DXC trades at $8.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 88.40. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check DXC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while BBAI trades at $3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check BBAI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while BTCM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check BTCM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 964M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while VYX trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check VYX's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 899.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while WYFI trades at $23.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -23.53. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check WYFI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while ASGN trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check ASGN's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while MGIC trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check MGIC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 840.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while EFOR trades at $20.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check EFOR's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CTLP trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CTLP's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 744.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while AUROW trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check AUROW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while VRRM trades at $4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check VRRM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 621M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while SHAZ trades at $63.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -17.62. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SHAZ's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while PHLT trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check PHLT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 609.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while NABL trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -64.70. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check NABL's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 516M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while TASK trades at $5.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TASK's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while GDYN trades at $6.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 101.50. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GDYN's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 406.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while IBEX trades at $30.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check IBEX's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 382.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CD trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -120.50. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CD's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 368.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while SDHI trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is 208.60. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDHI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SDHI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 364.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while PSFE trades at $7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check PSFE's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 349M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while TSSI trades at $12.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TSSI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 330M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while TLS trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TLS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while XRXDW trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check XRXDW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while SDHIU trades at $10.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SDHIU's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while UIS trades at $3.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check UIS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while HCKT trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check HCKT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check BULLZ's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 259.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while DMRC trades at $11.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check DMRC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CNDT trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CNDT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while III trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas III's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to III's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check III's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SRT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CTG's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while WYY trades at $11.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -61.11. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check WYY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while DVLT trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check DVLT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check ALYA's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while TTEC trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TTEC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CSPI trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -821.00. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CSPI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CTM trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -35.43. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CTM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SIFYR's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while USIO trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check USIO's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while JFU trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check JFU's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CLPS trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CLPS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while DTST trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check DTST's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while SAIH trades at $10.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SAIH's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while VEEA trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check VEEA's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while VEEAW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check VEEAW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while CHOW trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CHOW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while GLE trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GLE's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SGLB's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while LZMH trades at $1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check LZMH's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while ARBB trades at $5.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check ARBB's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while TDTH trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TDTH's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while LHSW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check LHSW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while SLAI trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SLAI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while JDZG trades at $50.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JDZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check JDZG's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 28.8B. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $54.03, while SASI trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SASI's competition here