Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLO | $7.71 | +2.94% | 1.6B | 21.86 | $0.35 | +13.03% |
| KHC | $23.81 | +1.97% | 27.8B | -4.82 | -$4.86 | +6.84% |
| JBS | $11.94 | +2.75% | 26.3B | 7.31 | $1.62 | +8.54% |
| GIS | $34.08 | +2.82% | 18B | 8.24 | $4.09 | +7.30% |
| HRL | $24.39 | +3.15% | 13.2B | 28.22 | $0.85 | +4.88% |
| MKC-V | $49.55 | +3.62% | 13.1B | 7.99 | $6.10 | +3.79% |
| MKC | $49.78 | +4.56% | 13.1B | 7.96 | $6.10 | +3.83% |
| SJM | $115.64 | +13.63% | 12B | -9.54 | -$11.78 | +3.95% |
| MICC | $17.63 | +3.83% | 10.7B | 31.15 | $0.56 | N/A |
| DAR | $58.58 | +0.38% | 9.3B | 42.28 | $1.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLO vs KHC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while KHC trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KHC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check KHC's competition here
FLO vs JBS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JBS has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while JBS trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas JBS's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to JBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JBS's competition here
FLO vs GIS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while GIS trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check GIS's competition here
FLO vs HRL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while HRL trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HRL's competition here
FLO vs MKC-V Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while MKC-V trades at $49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MKC-V's competition here
FLO vs MKC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while MKC trades at $49.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MKC's competition here
FLO vs SJM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while SJM trades at $115.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SJM's competition here
FLO vs MICC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MICC has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while MICC trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas MICC's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MICC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MICC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MICC's competition here
FLO vs DAR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while DAR trades at $58.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check DAR's competition here
FLO vs PPC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while PPC trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PPC's competition here
FLO vs CPB Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while CPB trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CPB's competition here
FLO vs INGR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while INGR trades at $103.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check INGR's competition here
FLO vs CAG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while CAG trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is -131.40. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CAG's competition here
FLO vs LW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while LW trades at $44.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LW's competition here
FLO vs BRFS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BRFS trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRFS's competition here
FLO vs LANC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LANC's competition here
FLO vs TWNK Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TWNK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while TWNK trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas TWNK's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWNK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to TWNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check TWNK's competition here
FLO vs TWNKW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check TWNKW's competition here
FLO vs POST Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while POST trades at $92.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check POST's competition here
FLO vs MZTI Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MZTI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while MZTI trades at $110.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas MZTI's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MZTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to MZTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MZTI's competition here
FLO vs CENT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while CENT trades at $41.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CENT's competition here
FLO vs FRPT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while FRPT trades at $51.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FRPT's competition here
FLO vs SOVO Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SOVO's competition here
FLO vs CENTA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while CENTA trades at $36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CENTA's competition here
FLO vs KLG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while KLG trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 67.65. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check KLG's competition here
FLO vs NOMD Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while NOMD trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NOMD's competition here
FLO vs JJSF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while JJSF trades at $78.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JJSF's competition here
FLO vs THS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while THS trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas THS's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check THS's competition here
FLO vs HLF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while HLF trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HLF's competition here
FLO vs SMPL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while SMPL trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is -11.01. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMPL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SMPL's competition here
FLO vs SENEB Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while SENEB trades at $148.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SENEB's competition here
FLO vs SENEA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while SENEA trades at $149.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SENEA's competition here
FLO vs BRBR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 977.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BRBR trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRBR's competition here
FLO vs JBSS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while JBSS trades at $77.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JBSS's competition here
FLO vs WEST Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 778.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while WEST trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check WEST's competition here
FLO vs STKL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 769.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while STKL trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STKL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check STKL's competition here
FLO vs UTZ Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 608.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while UTZ trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is -68.75. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UTZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check UTZ's competition here
FLO vs THRN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check THRN's competition here
FLO vs MAMA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 550M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while MAMA trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 90.07. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MAMA's competition here
FLO vs BRCC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 389.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BRCC trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRCC's competition here
FLO vs LWAY Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while LWAY trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LWAY's competition here
FLO vs BYND Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 355.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BYND trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYND's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BYND's competition here
FLO vs NATR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 354.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while NATR trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NATR's competition here
FLO vs USNA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 352.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while USNA trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 38.16. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check USNA's competition here
FLO vs BGS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 314.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BGS trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BGS's competition here
FLO vs FREE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FREE's competition here
FLO vs WESTW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check WESTW's competition here
FLO vs MMMB Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MMMB's competition here
FLO vs LFVN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 119.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while LFVN trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LFVN's competition here
FLO vs PLIN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PLIN's competition here
FLO vs OFRM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OFRM has a market cap of 110.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while OFRM trades at $16.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas OFRM's P/E ratio is -50.41. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OFRM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to OFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check OFRM's competition here
FLO vs FTLF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 97.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while FTLF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FTLF's competition here
FLO vs BRID Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BRID trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRID's competition here
FLO vs HAIN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while HAIN trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HAIN's competition here
FLO vs MITC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITC's ROE of -2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MITC's competition here
FLO vs BOF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BOF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BOF's competition here
FLO vs WYHG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while WYHG trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check WYHG's competition here
FLO vs LSF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while LSF trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -19.11. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LSF's competition here
FLO vs BRLS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BRLS trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRLS's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRLS's competition here
FLO vs CLXT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CLXT's competition here
FLO vs HAPP Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HAPP's competition here
FLO vs FARM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while FARM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FARM's competition here
FLO vs DDC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while DDC trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DDC's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check DDC's competition here
FLO vs JVA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while JVA trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check JVA's competition here
FLO vs YGF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check YGF's competition here
FLO vs ORIS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while ORIS trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ORIS's competition here
FLO vs COOT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while COOT trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check COOT's competition here
FLO vs NAII Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while NAII trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NAII's competition here
FLO vs MWYN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while MWYN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check MWYN's competition here
FLO vs TTCF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check TTCF's competition here
FLO vs PLAG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while PLAG trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -18.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PLAG's competition here
FLO vs PETZ Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while PETZ trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PETZ's competition here
FLO vs BON Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BON trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BON's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BON's competition here
FLO vs NUZE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NUZE's competition here
FLO vs ABVE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while ABVE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ABVE's competition here
FLO vs BTTR Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BTTR's competition here
FLO vs HCWC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while HCWC trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check HCWC's competition here
FLO vs CYAN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while CYAN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check CYAN's competition here
FLO vs ATPC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while ATPC trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ATPC's competition here
FLO vs FREEW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FREEW's competition here
FLO vs RGF Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check RGF's competition here
FLO vs NCRA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while NCRA trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check NCRA's competition here
FLO vs IMG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while IMG trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMG's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check IMG's competition here
FLO vs FAMI Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while FAMI trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check FAMI's competition here
FLO vs BRLSW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BRLSW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRLSW's competition here
FLO vs SOWG Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while SOWG trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -3.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SOWG's competition here
FLO vs ABVEW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while ABVEW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +6.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check ABVEW's competition here
FLO vs STKH Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 95.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while STKH trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check STKH's competition here
FLO vs PAVS Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 56.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while PAVS trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check PAVS's competition here
FLO vs SNAXW Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while SNAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SNAXW's competition here
FLO vs BSFC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 11.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BSFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSFC's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BSFC's competition here
FLO vs SMFL Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while SMFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SMFL's competition here
FLO vs SNAX Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while SNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNAX's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SNAX's competition here
FLO vs RIBT Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RIBT's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check RIBT's competition here
FLO vs SAFM Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check SAFM's competition here
FLO vs LNCE Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LNCE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while LNCE trades at $49.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas LNCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNCE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is more volatile compared to LNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check LNCE's competition here
FLO vs DTEA Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check DTEA's competition here
FLO vs BRCN Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check BRCN's competition here
FLO vs VGFC Comparison June 2026
FLO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLO stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLO is priced at $7.71, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.86, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLO is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLO.Check VGFC's competition here