Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLUT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUT | $110.65 | -0.14% | 19.2B | -52.72 | -$2.10 | N/A |
| LVS | $50.67 | +0.12% | 33.6B | 18.69 | $2.71 | +2.19% |
| DKNG | $29.00 | -3.40% | 14.4B | 322.22 | $0.09 | N/A |
| MGM | $48.97 | +3.71% | 12.5B | 67.07 | $0.73 | N/A |
| WYNN | $107.27 | -0.45% | 11.1B | 30.74 | $3.49 | +0.93% |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| RSI | $29.60 | +0.99% | 7B | 87.04 | $0.34 | N/A |
| SGHC | $13.48 | -2.46% | 6.8B | 28.05 | $0.48 | +3.05% |
| BYD | $87.46 | +1.05% | 6.5B | 3.87 | $22.62 | +0.85% |
| CHDN | $86.94 | -0.15% | 6.1B | 16.01 | $5.43 | +0.51% |
Stock Comparison
FLUT vs LVS Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while LVS trades at $50.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LVS's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LVS's competition here
FLUT vs DKNG Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while DKNG trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is 322.22. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check DKNG's competition here
FLUT vs MGM Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while MGM trades at $48.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 67.07. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MGM's competition here
FLUT vs WYNN Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while WYNN trades at $107.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check WYNN's competition here
FLUT vs LNW Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LNW's competition here
FLUT vs RSI Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while RSI trades at $29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 87.04. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check RSI's competition here
FLUT vs SGHC Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while SGHC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SGHC's competition here
FLUT vs BYD Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while BYD trades at $87.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check BYD's competition here
FLUT vs CHDN Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while CHDN trades at $86.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CHDN's competition here
FLUT vs CZR Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while CZR trades at $29.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CZR's competition here
FLUT vs SGMS Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SGMS's competition here
FLUT vs MTN Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while MTN trades at $133.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MTN's competition here
FLUT vs HGV Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while HGV trades at $50.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check HGV's competition here
FLUT vs RRR Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while RRR trades at $63.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check RRR's competition here
FLUT vs IGT Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check IGT's competition here
FLUT vs VAC Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while VAC trades at $93.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check VAC's competition here
FLUT vs PENN Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while PENN trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check PENN's competition here
FLUT vs MCRI Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while MCRI trades at $129.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MCRI's competition here
FLUT vs BRSL Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while BRSL trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check BRSL's competition here
FLUT vs MLCO Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while MLCO trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MLCO's competition here
FLUT vs PLYA Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check PLYA's competition here
FLUT vs EVRI Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check EVRI's competition here
FLUT vs ACEL Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while ACEL trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check ACEL's competition here
FLUT vs BVH Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check BVH's competition here
FLUT vs NGMS Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check NGMS's competition here
FLUT vs FBYDP Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, FBYDP has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while FBYDP trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas FBYDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FBYDP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to FBYDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check FBYDP's competition here
FLUT vs GDEN Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 753.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while GDEN trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is -124.13. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GDEN's competition here
FLUT vs BALY Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 619.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while BALY trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check BALY's competition here
FLUT vs TPGH-UN Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
FLUT vs AGS Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check AGS's competition here
FLUT vs CDROW Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 452.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while CDROW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CDROW's competition here
FLUT vs CDRO Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 444.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while CDRO trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 325.67. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CDRO's competition here
FLUT vs INSE Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 221.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while INSE trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INSE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check INSE's competition here
FLUT vs FLL Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 120.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while FLL trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FLL's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check FLL's competition here
FLUT vs MSC Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while MSC trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MSC's competition here
FLUT vs GAN Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GAN's competition here
FLUT vs GAMB Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while GAMB trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GAMB's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GAMB's competition here
FLUT vs CPHC Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 81.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while CPHC trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -1589.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CPHC's competition here
FLUT vs ROLR Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, ROLR has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while ROLR trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas ROLR's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ROLR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to ROLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check ROLR's competition here
FLUT vs CNTY Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while CNTY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CNTY's competition here
FLUT vs LTRY Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LTRY's competition here
FLUT vs SLNA Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SLNA's competition here
FLUT vs SEGG Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while SEGG trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SEGG's competition here
FLUT vs SLNAW Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SLNAW's competition here
FLUT vs GMBL Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 114.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while GMBL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBL's competition here
FLUT vs LTRYW Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 43.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LTRYW's competition here
FLUT vs GMBLW Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBLW's competition here
FLUT vs GMBLP Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 15.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while GMBLP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBLP's competition here
FLUT vs EBET Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EBET's ROE of +6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check EBET's competition here
FLUT vs GMBLZ Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBLZ's competition here
FLUT vs GNOG Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GNOG's competition here
FLUT vs PNK Comparison June 2026
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 19.2B. In comparison, PNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $110.65, while PNK trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of -52.72, whereas PNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PNK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to PNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check PNK's competition here