flyExclusive, Inc. (FLYX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLYX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLYX | $2.41 | -6.59% | 192M | -2.70 | -$0.88 | N/A |
| DAL | $81.17 | +3.78% | 53.3B | 11.85 | $6.85 | +0.93% |
| UAL | $109.63 | +4.09% | 35.6B | 9.81 | $11.18 | N/A |
| RYAAY | $58.00 | +2.96% | 30.3B | 12.24 | $4.74 | +1.71% |
| LUV | $43.17 | +5.24% | 21.1B | 28.79 | $1.50 | +1.68% |
| CEA | $20.09 | +2.55% | 15.9B | -3.65 | -$5.50 | N/A |
| LTM | $49.26 | +4.76% | 14.4B | 8.52 | $5.78 | +3.16% |
| PAC | $226.18 | +0.75% | 11.4B | 20.16 | $11.22 | +5.37% |
| AAL | $14.09 | +3.60% | 9.3B | 45.45 | $0.31 | N/A |
| JOBY | $9.27 | -4.43% | 9.1B | -8.13 | -$1.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLYX vs DAL Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, DAL has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while DAL trades at $81.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas DAL's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DAL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to DAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check DAL's competition here
FLYX vs UAL Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, UAL has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while UAL trades at $109.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas UAL's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UAL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to UAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check UAL's competition here
FLYX vs RYAAY Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, RYAAY has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while RYAAY trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas RYAAY's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYAAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to RYAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check RYAAY's competition here
FLYX vs LUV Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, LUV has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while LUV trades at $43.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas LUV's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to LUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check LUV's competition here
FLYX vs CEA Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, CEA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while CEA trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas CEA's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to CEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check CEA's competition here
FLYX vs LTM Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, LTM has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while LTM trades at $49.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas LTM's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LTM's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to LTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check LTM's competition here
FLYX vs PAC Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, PAC has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while PAC trades at $226.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas PAC's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to PAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check PAC's competition here
FLYX vs AAL Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, AAL has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while AAL trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas AAL's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to AAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check AAL's competition here
FLYX vs JOBY Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, JOBY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while JOBY trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas JOBY's P/E ratio is -8.13. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOBY's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to JOBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check JOBY's competition here
FLYX vs ASR Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, ASR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while ASR trades at $278.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas ASR's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ASR's competition here
FLYX vs CPA Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, CPA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while CPA trades at $135.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas CPA's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to CPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check CPA's competition here
FLYX vs ALK Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, ALK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while ALK trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas ALK's P/E ratio is 94.00. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ALK's competition here
FLYX vs OMAB Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, OMAB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while OMAB trades at $96.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas OMAB's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMAB's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to OMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check OMAB's competition here
FLYX vs GOL Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, GOL has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while GOL trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas GOL's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to GOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check GOL's competition here
FLYX vs CAAP Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, CAAP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while CAAP trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas CAAP's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to CAAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check CAAP's competition here
FLYX vs SKYW Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, SKYW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while SKYW trades at $87.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas SKYW's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to SKYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SKYW's competition here
FLYX vs AAWW Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, AAWW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while AAWW trades at $102.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas AAWW's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAWW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to AAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check AAWW's competition here
FLYX vs AERO Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, AERO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while AERO trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas AERO's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AERO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to AERO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check AERO's competition here
FLYX vs PBI-PB Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, PBI-PB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while PBI-PB trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas PBI-PB's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBI-PB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to PBI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check PBI-PB's competition here
FLYX vs JBLU Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, JBLU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while JBLU trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas JBLU's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBLU's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to JBLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check JBLU's competition here
FLYX vs ALGT Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, ALGT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while ALGT trades at $86.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas ALGT's P/E ratio is -45.15. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ALGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ALGT's competition here
FLYX vs ATSG Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, ATSG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while ATSG trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas ATSG's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATSG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ATSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ATSG's competition here
FLYX vs ULCC Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, ULCC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while ULCC trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas ULCC's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ULCC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ULCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ULCC's competition here
FLYX vs HA Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, HA has a market cap of 936.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while HA trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas HA's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HA's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to HA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check HA's competition here
FLYX vs SNCY Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, SNCY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while SNCY trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas SNCY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to SNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SNCY's competition here
FLYX vs VLRS Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, VLRS has a market cap of 856.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while VLRS trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas VLRS's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLRS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to VLRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check VLRS's competition here
FLYX vs RJET Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, RJET has a market cap of 844.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while RJET trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas RJET's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RJET's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to RJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check RJET's competition here
FLYX vs JOBY-WT Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 629.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while JOBY-WT trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check JOBY-WT's competition here
FLYX vs SRTA Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, SRTA has a market cap of 485.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while SRTA trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas SRTA's P/E ratio is -29.53. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRTA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to SRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SRTA's competition here
FLYX vs BLDE Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, BLDE has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while BLDE trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas BLDE's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLDE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to BLDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check BLDE's competition here
FLYX vs ASLE Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, ASLE has a market cap of 299.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while ASLE trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas ASLE's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASLE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ASLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ASLE's competition here
FLYX vs UP Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, UP has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while UP trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas UP's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to UP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check UP's competition here
FLYX vs PACI-WT Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, PACI-WT has a market cap of 208.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while PACI-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas PACI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PACI-WT's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to PACI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check PACI-WT's competition here
FLYX vs AZUL Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, AZUL has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while AZUL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas AZUL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AZUL's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to AZUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check AZUL's competition here
FLYX vs SAVE Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, SAVE has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while SAVE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas SAVE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAVE's ROE of +15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to SAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SAVE's competition here
FLYX vs SRFM Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, SRFM has a market cap of 111.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while SRFM trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas SRFM's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRFM's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to SRFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SRFM's competition here
FLYX vs MATH Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, MATH has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while MATH trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas MATH's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MATH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to MATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check MATH's competition here
FLYX vs FLYY Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, FLYY has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while FLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas FLYY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLYY's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to FLYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check FLYY's competition here
FLYX vs BLDEW Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, BLDEW has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while BLDEW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas BLDEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLDEW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to BLDEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check BLDEW's competition here
FLYX vs FLYX-WT Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, FLYX-WT has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while FLYX-WT trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas FLYX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLYX-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to FLYX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check FLYX-WT's competition here
FLYX vs MESA Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, MESA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while MESA trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas MESA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MESA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to MESA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check MESA's competition here
FLYX vs SOAR Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, SOAR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while SOAR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas SOAR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOAR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to SOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SOAR's competition here
FLYX vs SRTAW Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, SRTAW has a market cap of 42.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while SRTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas SRTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRTAW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is less volatile compared to SRTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check SRTAW's competition here
FLYX vs ZNH Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, ZNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while ZNH trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas ZNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZNH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ZNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ZNH's competition here
FLYX vs UP-WT Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, UP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while UP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas UP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UP-WT's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to UP-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check UP-WT's competition here
FLYX vs ASLEW Comparison June 2026
FLYX plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLYX stands at 192M. In comparison, ASLEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYX is priced at $2.41, while ASLEW trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLYX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.70, whereas ASLEW's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, FLYX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASLEW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYX is more volatile compared to ASLEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYX.Check ASLEW's competition here