W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWW | $1,315.87 | +0.15% | 62.1B | 35.41 | $37.16 | +0.71% |
| FAST | $46.57 | +0.39% | 53.5B | 41.21 | $1.13 | +1.97% |
| FERG | $230.08 | +0.90% | 44.6B | 22.62 | $10.17 | +1.52% |
| WCC | $346.77 | +0.74% | 16.9B | 24.64 | $14.07 | +0.55% |
| WSO | $380.46 | -1.01% | 15.7B | 31.21 | $12.20 | +3.24% |
| WSO-B | $376.02 | +7.43% | 14.2B | 30.82 | $12.20 | +3.24% |
| QXO | $16.63 | +0.30% | 12B | -17.48 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| AIT | $320.11 | +0.38% | 11.8B | 30.22 | $10.59 | +0.61% |
| WCC-PA | $221.82 | +1.73% | 10.9B | 21.85 | $10.15 | +0.55% |
| CNM | $48.33 | -3.46% | 9B | 20.48 | $2.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GWW vs FAST Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, FAST has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while FAST trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas FAST's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FAST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to FAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check FAST's competition here
GWW vs FERG Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, FERG has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while FERG trades at $230.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas FERG's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to FERG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to FERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check FERG's competition here
GWW vs WCC Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, WCC has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while WCC trades at $346.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas WCC's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WCC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to WCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WCC's competition here
GWW vs WSO Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, WSO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while WSO trades at $380.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas WSO's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WSO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to WSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WSO's competition here
GWW vs WSO-B Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, WSO-B has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while WSO-B trades at $376.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas WSO-B's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WSO-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to WSO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WSO-B's competition here
GWW vs QXO Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while QXO trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -17.48. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check QXO's competition here
GWW vs AIT Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, AIT has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while AIT trades at $320.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas AIT's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to AIT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to AIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check AIT's competition here
GWW vs WCC-PA Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, WCC-PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while WCC-PA trades at $221.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas WCC-PA's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to WCC-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to WCC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check WCC-PA's competition here
GWW vs CNM Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, CNM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while CNM trades at $48.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas CNM's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to CNM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to CNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check CNM's competition here
GWW vs POOL Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, POOL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while POOL trades at $195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas POOL's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to POOL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to POOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check POOL's competition here
GWW vs MSM Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, MSM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while MSM trades at $116.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas MSM's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to MSM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to MSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check MSM's competition here
GWW vs SITE Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, SITE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while SITE trades at $106.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SITE's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SITE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to SITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check SITE's competition here
GWW vs DXPE Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, DXPE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while DXPE trades at $168.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas DXPE's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DXPE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to DXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check DXPE's competition here
GWW vs SYX Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, SYX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while SYX trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas SYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to SYX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to SYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check SYX's competition here
GWW vs DSGR Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, DSGR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while DSGR trades at $27.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas DSGR's P/E ratio is 231.00. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to DSGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to DSGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check DSGR's competition here
GWW vs GIC Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, GIC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while GIC trades at $31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas GIC's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to GIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to GIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check GIC's competition here
GWW vs TRNS Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, TRNS has a market cap of 852.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while TRNS trades at $91.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TRNS's P/E ratio is 160.11. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TRNS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to TRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check TRNS's competition here
GWW vs LAWS Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, LAWS has a market cap of 796.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while LAWS trades at $40.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas LAWS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to LAWS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to LAWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check LAWS's competition here
GWW vs TITN Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, TITN has a market cap of 472.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while TITN trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas TITN's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to TITN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to TITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check TITN's competition here
GWW vs EVI Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, EVI has a market cap of 217M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while EVI trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas EVI's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to EVI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to EVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check EVI's competition here
GWW vs BRIA Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, BRIA has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while BRIA trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas BRIA's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to BRIA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to BRIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check BRIA's competition here
GWW vs HTLM Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while HTLM trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check HTLM's competition here
GWW vs RECT Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, RECT has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while RECT trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas RECT's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to RECT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to RECT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check RECT's competition here
GWW vs PASW Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, PASW has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while PASW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas PASW's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to PASW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is less volatile compared to PASW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check PASW's competition here
GWW vs HWCC Comparison June 2026
GWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GWW stands at 62.1B. In comparison, HWCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GWW is priced at $1,315.87, while HWCC trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GWW currently has a P/E ratio of 35.41, whereas HWCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GWW's ROE is +0.47%, compared to HWCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GWW is more volatile compared to HWCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GWW.Check HWCC's competition here