Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFS | $53.26 | +12.93% | 5.8B | 9.74 | $5.39 | +3.40% |
| HDB | $23.53 | +2.24% | 119.4B | 16.40 | $1.42 | +4.81% |
| MFG | $9.48 | -1.15% | 116.6B | 15.18 | $0.63 | +1.81% |
| IBN | $26.91 | +4.69% | 94.3B | 16.64 | $1.58 | +0.95% |
| PNC | $235.75 | +3.79% | 93.3B | 13.49 | $17.22 | +2.94% |
| USB-PA | $768.00 | +0.07% | 85.9B | 218.65 | $3.51 | +3.68% |
| ITUB | $7.54 | +1.48% | 82.9B | 9.29 | $0.81 | +8.33% |
| LYG | $5.21 | -1.79% | 78.5B | 13.02 | $0.41 | +3.68% |
| USB-PS | $17.33 | -0.20% | 65.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.68% |
| TFC | $50.13 | +2.65% | 61.6B | 12.23 | $4.04 | +4.21% |
Stock Comparison
IFS vs HDB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while HDB trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check HDB's competition here
IFS vs MFG Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 116.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while MFG trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check MFG's competition here
IFS vs IBN Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while IBN trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check IBN's competition here
IFS vs PNC Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while PNC trades at $235.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check PNC's competition here
IFS vs USB-PA Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while USB-PA trades at $768.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 218.65. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check USB-PA's competition here
IFS vs ITUB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while ITUB trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check ITUB's competition here
IFS vs LYG Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while LYG trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check LYG's competition here
IFS vs USB-PS Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while USB-PS trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check USB-PS's competition here
IFS vs TFC Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while TFC trades at $50.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check TFC's competition here
IFS vs TFC-PR Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while TFC-PR trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check TFC-PR's competition here
IFS vs DB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while DB trades at $31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check DB's competition here
IFS vs FITB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FITB trades at $53.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FITB's competition here
IFS vs FITBM Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FITBM trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FITBM's competition here
IFS vs HBANZ Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while HBANZ trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check HBANZ's competition here
IFS vs HBANL Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while HBANL trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check HBANL's competition here
IFS vs BSBR Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while BSBR trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check BSBR's competition here
IFS vs KB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while KB trades at $102.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check KB's competition here
IFS vs BBD Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while BBD trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check BBD's competition here
IFS vs HBAN Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while HBAN trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check HBAN's competition here
IFS vs MTB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while MTB trades at $226.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check MTB's competition here
IFS vs HBANM Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while HBANM trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check HBANM's competition here
IFS vs SHG Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while SHG trades at $65.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check SHG's competition here
IFS vs BBDO Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while BBDO trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check BBDO's competition here
IFS vs CFG Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CFG trades at $66.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CFG's competition here
IFS vs KEY-PL Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while KEY-PL trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check KEY-PL's competition here
IFS vs CFG-PH Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CFG-PH trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CFG-PH's competition here
IFS vs CFG-PE Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CFG-PE trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CFG-PE's competition here
IFS vs TFC-PO Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while TFC-PO trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check TFC-PO's competition here
IFS vs HBANP Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while HBANP trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check HBANP's competition here
IFS vs RF-PE Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while RF-PE trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check RF-PE's competition here
IFS vs RF-PC Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while RF-PC trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check RF-PC's competition here
IFS vs RF Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while RF trades at $28.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check RF's competition here
IFS vs FCNCA Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FCNCA trades at $2,134.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FCNCA's competition here
IFS vs TFC-PI Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while TFC-PI trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check TFC-PI's competition here
IFS vs KEY Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while KEY trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check KEY's competition here
IFS vs KEY-PJ Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
IFS vs KEY-PK Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while KEY-PK trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check KEY-PK's competition here
IFS vs FCNCN Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FCNCN trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FCNCN's competition here
IFS vs RF-PF Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while RF-PF trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check RF-PF's competition here
IFS vs KEY-PI Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while KEY-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check KEY-PI's competition here
IFS vs BCH Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while BCH trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check BCH's competition here
IFS vs CIB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CIB trades at $75.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CIB's competition here
IFS vs FITBI Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FITBI trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FITBI's competition here
IFS vs FITBP Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FITBP trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FITBP's competition here
IFS vs CFG-PD Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CFG-PD's competition here
IFS vs BSAC Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while BSAC trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check BSAC's competition here
IFS vs WF Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while WF trades at $59.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check WF's competition here
IFS vs VLYPN Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while VLYPN trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check VLYPN's competition here
IFS vs FHN-PC Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FHN-PC trades at $30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FHN-PC's competition here
IFS vs FITBO Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FITBO trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FITBO's competition here
IFS vs FHN-PB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FHN-PB's competition here
IFS vs FHN-PE Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FHN-PE trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FHN-PE's competition here
IFS vs WBS Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while WBS trades at $72.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check WBS's competition here
IFS vs FHN Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FHN trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FHN's competition here
IFS vs CMA Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CMA's competition here
IFS vs WTFC Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while WTFC trades at $156.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check WTFC's competition here
IFS vs BPOP Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while BPOP trades at $157.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check BPOP's competition here
IFS vs UMBF Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while UMBF trades at $132.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check UMBF's competition here
IFS vs ZION Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while ZION trades at $66.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check ZION's competition here
IFS vs ONBPO Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while ONBPO trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check ONBPO's competition here
IFS vs ONBPP Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while ONBPP trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check ONBPP's competition here
IFS vs ONB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while ONB trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check ONB's competition here
IFS vs SSB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while SSB trades at $96.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check SSB's competition here
IFS vs ZIONP Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ZIONP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while ZIONP trades at $18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ZIONP's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZIONP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ZIONP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check ZIONP's competition here
IFS vs CFR Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CFR trades at $145.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CFR's competition here
IFS vs WAL Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while WAL trades at $82.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check WAL's competition here
IFS vs FHN-PD Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FHN-PD's competition here
IFS vs WAL-PA Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WAL-PA has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while WAL-PA trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas WAL-PA's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WAL-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to WAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check WAL-PA's competition here
IFS vs FHN-PF Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FHN-PF trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FHN-PF's competition here
IFS vs GGAL Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while GGAL trades at $50.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 135.11. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check GGAL's competition here
IFS vs BOKF Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while BOKF trades at $132.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check BOKF's competition here
IFS vs CBSH Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CBSH trades at $54.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CBSH's competition here
IFS vs CADE Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CADE's competition here
IFS vs VLY Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while VLY trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check VLY's competition here
IFS vs BSMX Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check BSMX's competition here
IFS vs PNFP Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while PNFP trades at $94.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check PNFP's competition here
IFS vs COLB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while COLB trades at $30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check COLB's competition here
IFS vs PB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while PB trades at $71.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check PB's competition here
IFS vs SNV Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check SNV's competition here
IFS vs CBC Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CBC trades at $28.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CBC's competition here
IFS vs SNV-PD Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check SNV-PD's competition here
IFS vs CHYM Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CHYM trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CHYM's competition here
IFS vs CUBI-PE Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
IFS vs FNB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FNB trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FNB's competition here
IFS vs GBCI Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while GBCI trades at $48.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check GBCI's competition here
IFS vs UBSI Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while UBSI trades at $44.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check UBSI's competition here
IFS vs AVAL Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while AVAL trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check AVAL's competition here
IFS vs FLG Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while FLG trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -67.76. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check FLG's competition here
IFS vs ABCB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while ABCB trades at $86.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check ABCB's competition here
IFS vs HWC Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while HWC trades at $71.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check HWC's competition here
IFS vs BMA Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while BMA trades at $87.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check BMA's competition here
IFS vs OZK Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while OZK trades at $51.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check OZK's competition here
IFS vs AUB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while AUB trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check AUB's competition here
IFS vs HOMB Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while HOMB trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check HOMB's competition here
IFS vs VLYPO Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while VLYPO trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check VLYPO's competition here
IFS vs VLYPP Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while VLYPP trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check VLYPP's competition here
IFS vs BXS Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check BXS's competition here
IFS vs AX Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while AX trades at $89.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check AX's competition here
IFS vs NYCB-PA Comparison June 2026
IFS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IFS stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IFS is priced at $53.26, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IFS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.74, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, IFS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IFS is more volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IFS.Check NYCB-PA's competition here