Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRT | $29.31 | +0.96% | 583.3M | 18.49 | $1.58 | +6.09% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| SW | $39.24 | -3.11% | 21.7B | 57.44 | $0.72 | +4.28% |
| PKG | $215.70 | -1.70% | 20.3B | 27.66 | $8.22 | +2.21% |
| IP | $32.85 | -0.03% | 18.1B | -6.57 | -$5.19 | +5.47% |
| AMCR | $38.47 | +1.71% | 18B | 31.06 | $1.25 | +6.67% |
| BALL | $55.11 | +4.73% | 14.4B | 15.79 | $3.43 | +1.49% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| AVY | $159.68 | +4.36% | 12.2B | 17.95 | $8.88 | +2.41% |
| CCK | $96.01 | +4.31% | 10.7B | 15.21 | $6.29 | +1.28% |
Stock Comparison
KRT vs BLL Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BLL's competition here
KRT vs SW Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while SW trades at $39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 57.44. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SW's competition here
KRT vs PKG Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while PKG trades at $215.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PKG's competition here
KRT vs IP Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while IP trades at $32.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check IP's competition here
KRT vs AMCR Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while AMCR trades at $38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check AMCR's competition here
KRT vs BALL Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while BALL trades at $55.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BALL's competition here
KRT vs WRK Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check WRK's competition here
KRT vs AVY Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, AVY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while AVY trades at $159.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas AVY's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AVY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to AVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check AVY's competition here
KRT vs CCK Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while CCK trades at $96.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check CCK's competition here
KRT vs BERY Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BERY's competition here
KRT vs SEE Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while SEE trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SEE's competition here
KRT vs SON Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while SON trades at $49.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SON's competition here
KRT vs REYN Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while REYN trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check REYN's competition here
KRT vs SLGN Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while SLGN trades at $39.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SLGN's competition here
KRT vs PTVE Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PTVE's competition here
KRT vs GPK Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while GPK trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GPK's competition here
KRT vs GEF-B Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while GEF-B trades at $80.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GEF-B's competition here
KRT vs GEF Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while GEF trades at $65.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GEF's competition here
KRT vs AMBP Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while AMBP trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -406.50. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check AMBP's competition here
KRT vs TRS Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while TRS trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 115.81. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRS's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TRS's competition here
KRT vs OI Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while OI trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check OI's competition here
KRT vs MYE Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 978.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while MYE trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check MYE's competition here
KRT vs FFHL Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check FFHL's competition here
KRT vs PACK Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 594.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while PACK trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PACK's competition here
KRT vs OCTO Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check OCTO's competition here
KRT vs TUP Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TUP's competition here
KRT vs MGIH Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while MGIH trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check MGIH's competition here
KRT vs YHGJ Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while YHGJ trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check YHGJ's competition here
KRT vs DSS Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while DSS trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSS's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check DSS's competition here
KRT vs TYDE Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TYDE's competition here
KRT vs UNFL Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KRT has daily volatility of 1.64 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here
KRT vs ARD Comparison June 2026
KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 583.3M. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $29.31, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.49, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check ARD's competition here