Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KRYS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRYS | $314.63 | +4.26% | 9.1B | 41.41 | $7.48 | N/A |
| NVO | $43.60 | +6.29% | 187.5B | 9.90 | $4.26 | +4.27% |
| VRTX | $438.20 | -1.07% | 113.1B | 26.46 | $16.85 | N/A |
| VRNA | $106.91 | +0.11% | 72.7B | -102.80 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| REGN | $609.86 | -0.24% | 63.5B | 15.03 | $40.99 | +0.59% |
| ARGX | $876.95 | -0.62% | 54.7B | 39.27 | $22.51 | N/A |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $295.12 | +1.01% | 39.7B | 74.98 | $3.97 | N/A |
| RVMD | $142.35 | -4.13% | 31.8B | -21.11 | -$7.09 | N/A |
| RPRX | $55.29 | +0.78% | 23.9B | 29.28 | $1.90 | +1.64% |
Stock Comparison
KRYS vs NVO Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NVO has a market cap of 187.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while NVO trades at $43.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas NVO's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NVO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to NVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check NVO's competition here
KRYS vs VRTX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while VRTX trades at $438.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VRTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check VRTX's competition here
KRYS vs VRNA Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while VRNA trades at $106.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -102.80. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check VRNA's competition here
KRYS vs REGN Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while REGN trades at $609.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check REGN's competition here
KRYS vs ARGX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ARGX trades at $876.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ARGX's competition here
KRYS vs SGEN Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check SGEN's competition here
KRYS vs ALNY Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ALNY trades at $295.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is 74.98. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALNY's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ALNY's competition here
KRYS vs RVMD Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while RVMD trades at $142.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -21.11. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check RVMD's competition here
KRYS vs RPRX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while RPRX trades at $55.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check RPRX's competition here
KRYS vs UTHR Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while UTHR trades at $545.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check UTHR's competition here
KRYS vs BNTX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while BNTX trades at $86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -14.71. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check BNTX's competition here
KRYS vs INSM Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, INSM has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while INSM trades at $94.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas INSM's P/E ratio is -17.19. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INSM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to INSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check INSM's competition here
KRYS vs ROIV Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ROIV trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -53.80. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ROIV's competition here
KRYS vs INCY Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while INCY trades at $106.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check INCY's competition here
KRYS vs BGNE Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BGNE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check BGNE's competition here
KRYS vs MRNA Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while MRNA trades at $46.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check MRNA's competition here
KRYS vs DNA-WT Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check DNA-WT's competition here
KRYS vs NBIX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while NBIX trades at $165.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check NBIX's competition here
KRYS vs GMAB Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while GMAB trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check GMAB's competition here
KRYS vs JAZZ Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while JAZZ trades at $229.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 1909.92. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check JAZZ's competition here
KRYS vs EXEL Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while EXEL trades at $52.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check EXEL's competition here
KRYS vs BBIO Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while BBIO trades at $68.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -18.10. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check BBIO's competition here
KRYS vs ASND Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ASND trades at $213.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASND's ROE of -56.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ASND's competition here
KRYS vs AXSM Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while AXSM trades at $249.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -66.03. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check AXSM's competition here
KRYS vs KRTX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check KRTX's competition here
KRYS vs IONS Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while IONS trades at $74.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -37.10. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check IONS's competition here
KRYS vs RNAM Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RNAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while RNAM trades at $72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas RNAM's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RNAM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to RNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check RNAM's competition here
KRYS vs BMRN Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while BMRN trades at $57.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 41.66. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check BMRN's competition here
KRYS vs SMMT Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while SMMT trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check SMMT's competition here
KRYS vs MDGL Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while MDGL trades at $481.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check MDGL's competition here
KRYS vs ARWR Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ARWR trades at $70.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -32.30. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ARWR's competition here
KRYS vs RXDX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check RXDX's competition here
KRYS vs NUVL Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while NUVL trades at $123.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -20.34. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check NUVL's competition here
KRYS vs IMGN Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check IMGN's competition here
KRYS vs TECH Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while TECH trades at $53.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 77.73. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check TECH's competition here
KRYS vs CYTK Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CYTK trades at $67.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -9.99. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CYTK's competition here
KRYS vs HALO Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while HALO trades at $71.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check HALO's competition here
KRYS vs BPMC Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while BPMC trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check BPMC's competition here
KRYS vs CORT Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CORT trades at $79.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 221.40. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CORT's competition here
KRYS vs CERE Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CERE's competition here
KRYS vs IBRX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while IBRX trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check IBRX's competition here
KRYS vs MTSR Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while MTSR trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check MTSR's competition here
KRYS vs ALKS Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ALKS trades at $44.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 49.21. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ALKS's competition here
KRYS vs MRUS Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while MRUS trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -17.05. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check MRUS's competition here
KRYS vs PTGX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while PTGX trades at $107.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is -58.49. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTGX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check PTGX's competition here
KRYS vs PCVX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while PCVX trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check PCVX's competition here
KRYS vs ABVX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ABVX trades at $97.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -19.16. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABVX's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ABVX's competition here
KRYS vs ACLX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ACLX trades at $115.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ACLX's competition here
KRYS vs TGTX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while TGTX trades at $47.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check TGTX's competition here
KRYS vs RETA Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check RETA's competition here
KRYS vs IMVT Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while IMVT trades at $31.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check IMVT's competition here
KRYS vs KYMR Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while KYMR trades at $76.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -21.48. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check KYMR's competition here
KRYS vs LEGN Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while LEGN trades at $34.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -24.27. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check LEGN's competition here
KRYS vs CNTA Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CNTA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CNTA trades at $39.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CNTA's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNTA's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to CNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CNTA's competition here
KRYS vs PTCT Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while PTCT trades at $74.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is -29.01. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTCT's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check PTCT's competition here
KRYS vs RYTM Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while RYTM trades at $88.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -28.07. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check RYTM's competition here
KRYS vs LQDA Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LQDA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while LQDA trades at $66.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas LQDA's P/E ratio is 376.53. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LQDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to LQDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check LQDA's competition here
KRYS vs BLTE Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BLTE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while BLTE trades at $140.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas BLTE's P/E ratio is -55.68. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BLTE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to BLTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check BLTE's competition here
KRYS vs CDTX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CDTX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CDTX trades at $221.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CDTX's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CDTX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to CDTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CDTX's competition here
KRYS vs ABCM Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ABCM's competition here
KRYS vs ISEE Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ISEE's competition here
KRYS vs COGT Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, COGT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while COGT trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas COGT's P/E ratio is -14.74. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COGT's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to COGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check COGT's competition here
KRYS vs SRRK Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while SRRK trades at $46.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check SRRK's competition here
KRYS vs PRAX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PRAX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while PRAX trades at $243.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas PRAX's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRAX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to PRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check PRAX's competition here
KRYS vs APGE Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while APGE trades at $82.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -19.63. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check APGE's competition here
KRYS vs FBIOX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, FBIOX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while FBIOX trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas FBIOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FBIOX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to FBIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check FBIOX's competition here
KRYS vs APLS Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while APLS trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APLS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check APLS's competition here
KRYS vs CGON Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CGON has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CGON trades at $55.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CGON's P/E ratio is -24.22. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to CGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CGON's competition here
KRYS vs CRSP Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CRSP trades at $50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CRSP's competition here
KRYS vs LGND Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while LGND trades at $248.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LGND's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check LGND's competition here
KRYS vs CAI Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CAI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CAI trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CAI's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CAI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to CAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CAI's competition here
KRYS vs MIRM Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while MIRM trades at $95.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check MIRM's competition here
KRYS vs TERN Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TERN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while TERN trades at $52.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas TERN's P/E ratio is -51.41. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TERN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to TERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check TERN's competition here
KRYS vs SYRE Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SYRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while SYRE trades at $76.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas SYRE's P/E ratio is -36.06. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SYRE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to SYRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check SYRE's competition here
KRYS vs FOLD Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, FOLD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while FOLD trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas FOLD's P/E ratio is -161.00. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FOLD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to FOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check FOLD's competition here
KRYS vs TVTX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TVTX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while TVTX trades at $47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas TVTX's P/E ratio is -97.14. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TVTX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to TVTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check TVTX's competition here
KRYS vs CELC Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CELC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CELC trades at $87.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CELC's P/E ratio is -23.74. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CELC's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to CELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CELC's competition here
KRYS vs AKRO Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while AKRO trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check AKRO's competition here
KRYS vs ALPN Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ALPN's competition here
KRYS vs OPT Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OPT's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check OPT's competition here
KRYS vs ERAS Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ERAS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ERAS trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ERAS's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERAS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to ERAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ERAS's competition here
KRYS vs XENE Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while XENE trades at $51.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check XENE's competition here
KRYS vs MRTX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check MRTX's competition here
KRYS vs MANE Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MANE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while MANE trades at $94.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas MANE's P/E ratio is -36.10. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MANE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to MANE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check MANE's competition here
KRYS vs VCYT Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while VCYT trades at $48.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 45.59. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check VCYT's competition here
KRYS vs CPRX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CPRX trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CPRX's competition here
KRYS vs RYZB Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check RYZB's competition here
KRYS vs ACAD Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while ACAD trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check ACAD's competition here
KRYS vs CBAY Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CBAY's competition here
KRYS vs CRNX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while CRNX trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check CRNX's competition here
KRYS vs TNGX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TNGX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while TNGX trades at $29.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas TNGX's P/E ratio is -38.02. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TNGX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to TNGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check TNGX's competition here
KRYS vs EWTX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, EWTX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while EWTX trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas EWTX's P/E ratio is -20.52. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EWTX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to EWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check EWTX's competition here
KRYS vs KNSA Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while KNSA trades at $50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is 53.52. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNSA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check KNSA's competition here
KRYS vs NAMS Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while NAMS trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check NAMS's competition here
KRYS vs SWTX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while SWTX trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check SWTX's competition here
KRYS vs DNTH Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DNTH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while DNTH trades at $70.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas DNTH's P/E ratio is -19.99. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNTH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to DNTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check DNTH's competition here
KRYS vs VKTX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while VKTX trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check VKTX's competition here
KRYS vs DNLI Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DNLI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while DNLI trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas DNLI's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DNLI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is less volatile compared to DNLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check DNLI's competition here
KRYS vs TLX Comparison June 2026
KRYS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRYS stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRYS is priced at $314.63, while TLX trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRYS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.41, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is -470.50. In terms of profitability, KRYS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TLX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRYS is more volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRYS.Check TLX's competition here