Linkers Industries Limited (LNKS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LNKS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNKS | $1.65 | -8.10% | 85.4K | -0.04 | -$37.87 | N/A |
| CRS | $525.10 | +5.21% | 26B | 55.26 | $9.48 | +0.15% |
| ATI | $184.48 | +2.41% | 25.5B | 61.77 | $3.03 | N/A |
| MLI | $133.67 | +0.31% | 15B | 17.75 | $7.64 | +0.89% |
| ESAB | $85.50 | -2.75% | 5.4B | 23.41 | $3.78 | +0.46% |
| AZZ | $141.51 | +2.94% | 4.3B | 13.75 | $10.49 | +0.56% |
| GPGI | $11.60 | -2.44% | 3.4B | -5.05 | -$2.31 | +0.05% |
| ARNC | $29.99 | +0.03% | 3B | -12.55 | -$2.39 | N/A |
| WOR | $58.18 | +0.59% | 2.9B | 176.88 | $0.33 | +1.25% |
| CMPOW | $12.15 | +2.35% | 2.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.05% |
Stock Comparison
LNKS vs CRS Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, CRS has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while CRS trades at $525.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CRS's P/E ratio is 55.26. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to CRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check CRS's competition here
LNKS vs ATI Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while ATI trades at $184.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 61.77. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ATI's competition here
LNKS vs MLI Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while MLI trades at $133.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check MLI's competition here
LNKS vs ESAB Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while ESAB trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ESAB's competition here
LNKS vs AZZ Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while AZZ trades at $141.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check AZZ's competition here
LNKS vs GPGI Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, GPGI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while GPGI trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GPGI's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GPGI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to GPGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check GPGI's competition here
LNKS vs ARNC Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while ARNC trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ARNC's competition here
LNKS vs WOR Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while WOR trades at $58.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 176.88. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check WOR's competition here
LNKS vs CMPOW Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while CMPOW trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check CMPOW's competition here
LNKS vs CMPO Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while CMPO trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMPO's ROE of -72.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check CMPO's competition here
LNKS vs NWPX Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while NWPX trades at $124.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 29.07. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check NWPX's competition here
LNKS vs HAYN Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while HAYN trades at $60.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check HAYN's competition here
LNKS vs RYI Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 746.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while RYI trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check RYI's competition here
LNKS vs CMPOV Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, CMPOV has a market cap of 741.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while CMPOV trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CMPOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMPOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to CMPOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check CMPOV's competition here
LNKS vs MEC Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 713.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while MEC trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is -43.50. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MEC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check MEC's competition here
LNKS vs ELMT Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, ELMT has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while ELMT trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ELMT's P/E ratio is -134.00. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ELMT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to ELMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ELMT's competition here
LNKS vs IIIN Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while IIIN trades at $27.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check IIIN's competition here
LNKS vs TG Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 278.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while TG trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TG's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check TG's competition here
LNKS vs AP Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 212.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while AP trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AP's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AP's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check AP's competition here
LNKS vs GIFI Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while GIFI trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check GIFI's competition here
LNKS vs TPCS Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while TPCS trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -30.25. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check TPCS's competition here
LNKS vs TRSG Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while TRSG trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRSG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check TRSG's competition here
LNKS vs SGBXV Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, SGBXV has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while SGBXV trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SGBXV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGBXV's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to SGBXV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check SGBXV's competition here
LNKS vs OLOX Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, OLOX has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while OLOX trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OLOX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to OLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check OLOX's competition here
LNKS vs HIHO Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while HIHO trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HIHO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check HIHO's competition here
LNKS vs SGBX Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 533.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while SGBX trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGBX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check SGBX's competition here
LNKS vs MTEN Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 246.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while MTEN trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check MTEN's competition here
LNKS vs AP-WT Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check AP-WT's competition here
LNKS vs ALPP Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while ALPP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ALPP's competition here
LNKS vs CDSI Comparison June 2026
LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 85.4K. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $1.65, while CDSI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LNKS has daily volatility of 7.41 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.Check CDSI's competition here