Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LOMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOMA | $12.55 | -0.32% | 1.5B | 59.81 | $0.21 | N/A |
| CRH | $106.48 | +1.57% | 71.1B | 19.75 | $5.39 | +1.43% |
| VMC | $286.47 | +2.24% | 37.2B | 33.91 | $8.45 | +0.71% |
| MLM | $577.33 | +2.08% | 34.7B | 36.26 | $15.92 | +0.58% |
| AMRZ | $53.17 | +1.61% | 29.4B | 25.44 | $2.09 | +1.04% |
| CX | $12.98 | +2.20% | 18.8B | 37.06 | $0.35 | +0.69% |
| JHX | $24.13 | +1.00% | 14B | 134.06 | $0.18 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $215.25 | -0.83% | 6.7B | 16.37 | $13.15 | +0.46% |
| KNF | $76.92 | +1.32% | 4.4B | 29.94 | $2.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LOMA vs CRH Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while CRH trades at $106.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CRH's competition here
LOMA vs VMC Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while VMC trades at $286.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check VMC's competition here
LOMA vs MLM Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while MLM trades at $577.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 36.26. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check MLM's competition here
LOMA vs AMRZ Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while AMRZ trades at $53.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check AMRZ's competition here
LOMA vs CX Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while CX trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 37.06. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CX's competition here
LOMA vs JHX Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while JHX trades at $24.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 134.06. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check JHX's competition here
LOMA vs SUM Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check SUM's competition here
LOMA vs EXP Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while EXP trades at $215.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check EXP's competition here
LOMA vs KNF Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while KNF trades at $76.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check KNF's competition here
LOMA vs USLM Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while USLM trades at $108.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check USLM's competition here
LOMA vs TTAM Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while TTAM trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check TTAM's competition here
LOMA vs BCC Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while BCC trades at $71.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check BCC's competition here
LOMA vs TGLS Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while TGLS trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check TGLS's competition here
LOMA vs CPAC Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 913.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while CPAC trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CPAC's competition here
LOMA vs SMID Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 166.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while SMID trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check SMID's competition here
LOMA vs CAPS Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while CAPS trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CAPS's competition here
LOMA vs RETO Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 391.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while RETO trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check RETO's competition here
LOMA vs USCR Comparison June 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $12.55, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 59.81, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check USCR's competition here