Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LYFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYFT | $13.77 | -1.78% | 5.3B | 2.03 | $6.84 | N/A |
| SAP | $171.94 | -5.49% | 208.5B | 24.72 | $7.24 | +1.65% |
| APP | $511.31 | -9.29% | 175B | 45.37 | $11.48 | N/A |
| CRM | $173.74 | -4.83% | 143.6B | 20.32 | $8.63 | +0.97% |
| SHOP | $108.90 | -1.70% | 143.3B | 108.25 | $1.02 | N/A |
| UBER | $69.32 | -1.06% | 143.3B | 17.47 | $4.03 | N/A |
| NOW | $107.86 | -5.54% | 110.3B | 63.67 | $1.68 | N/A |
| CDNS | $396.00 | +0.45% | 107.8B | 91.12 | $4.29 | N/A |
| ADBE | $235.53 | -3.86% | 96.2B | 13.87 | $17.15 | N/A |
| SNOW | $244.79 | +1.80% | 83B | -67.88 | -$3.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYFT vs SAP Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 208.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while SAP trades at $171.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SAP's competition here
LYFT vs APP Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 175B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while APP trades at $511.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 45.37. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check APP's competition here
LYFT vs CRM Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 143.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while CRM trades at $173.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CRM's competition here
LYFT vs SHOP Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 143.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while SHOP trades at $108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 108.25. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SHOP's competition here
LYFT vs UBER Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 143.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while UBER trades at $69.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check UBER's competition here
LYFT vs NOW Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 110.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while NOW trades at $107.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 63.67. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NOW's competition here
LYFT vs CDNS Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 107.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while CDNS trades at $396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 91.12. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CDNS's competition here
LYFT vs ADBE Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while ADBE trades at $235.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ADBE's competition here
LYFT vs SNOW Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while SNOW trades at $244.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -67.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SNOW's competition here
LYFT vs DDOG Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 80.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while DDOG trades at $229.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 568.35. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DDOG's competition here
LYFT vs INTU Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while INTU trades at $285.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check INTU's competition here
LYFT vs ADSK Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while ADSK trades at $222.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ADSK's competition here
LYFT vs WDAY Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while WDAY trades at $138.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 43.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check WDAY's competition here
LYFT vs MSTR Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while MSTR trades at $118.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MSTR's competition here
LYFT vs ROP Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while ROP trades at $337.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ROP's competition here
LYFT vs ANSS Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ANSS's competition here
LYFT vs STRC Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while STRC trades at $95.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRC's competition here
LYFT vs FICO Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while FICO trades at $1,244.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 38.90. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FICO's competition here
LYFT vs ZM Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while ZM trades at $95.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZM's competition here
LYFT vs STRF Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while STRF trades at $94.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRF's competition here
LYFT vs TEAM Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while TEAM trades at $94.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -116.49. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TEAM's competition here
LYFT vs STRK Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while STRK trades at $66.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRK's competition here
LYFT vs AZPN Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AZPN's competition here
LYFT vs SSNC Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while SSNC trades at $68.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SSNC's competition here
LYFT vs PTC Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while PTC trades at $135.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PTC's competition here
LYFT vs GRAB Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while GRAB trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GRAB's competition here
LYFT vs TYL Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while TYL trades at $306.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TYL's competition here
LYFT vs U Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while U trades at $27.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas U's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check U's competition here
LYFT vs DT Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while DT trades at $41.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 75.52. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DT's competition here
LYFT vs BKI Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BKI's competition here
LYFT vs DAY Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DAY's competition here
LYFT vs XM Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check XM's competition here
LYFT vs CDAY Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CDAY's competition here
LYFT vs GWRE Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while GWRE trades at $120.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 67.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GWRE's competition here
LYFT vs HUBS Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while HUBS trades at $195.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 104.62. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check HUBS's competition here
LYFT vs FIG Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while FIG trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FIG's competition here
LYFT vs FROG Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while FROG trades at $83.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -153.32. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FROG's competition here
LYFT vs BSY Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while BSY trades at $32.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 38.06. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BSY's competition here
LYFT vs DOCU Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while DOCU trades at $45.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DOCU's competition here
LYFT vs MANH Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while MANH trades at $146.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MANH's competition here
LYFT vs OCFT Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OCFT's competition here
LYFT vs YMM Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while YMM trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check YMM's competition here
LYFT vs NATI Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NATI's competition here
LYFT vs SMAR Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SMAR's competition here
LYFT vs PAYC Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while PAYC trades at $137.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PAYC's competition here
LYFT vs CWAN Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while CWAN trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -135.25. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CWAN's competition here
LYFT vs PCOR Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while PCOR trades at $44.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -89.65. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PCOR's competition here
LYFT vs TTAN Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while TTAN trades at $71.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -48.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TTAN's competition here
LYFT vs IDCC Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while IDCC trades at $262.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check IDCC's competition here
LYFT vs DSGX Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while DSGX trades at $74.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DSGX's competition here
LYFT vs ESTC Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while ESTC trades at $60.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ESTC's competition here
LYFT vs COUP Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check COUP's competition here
LYFT vs APPF Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while APPF trades at $168.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 40.31. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check APPF's competition here
LYFT vs PCTY Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while PCTY trades at $111.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PCTY's competition here
LYFT vs PEGA Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while PEGA trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PEGA's competition here
LYFT vs DUOL Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while DUOL trades at $124.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DUOL's competition here
LYFT vs OTEX Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while OTEX trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OTEX's competition here
LYFT vs YOU Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while YOU trades at $53.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check YOU's competition here
LYFT vs OCTV Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while OCTV trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OCTV's competition here
LYFT vs ZETA Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while ZETA trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -210.90. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZETA's competition here
LYFT vs NICE Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while NICE trades at $88.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NICE's competition here
LYFT vs GTLB Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while GTLB trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -202.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GTLB's competition here
LYFT vs CVLT Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while CVLT trades at $124.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 77.07. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CVLT's competition here
LYFT vs COMP Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while COMP trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 409.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check COMP's competition here
LYFT vs NAVN Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while NAVN trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NAVN's competition here
LYFT vs GBTG Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while GBTG trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.34. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GBTG's competition here
LYFT vs SRAD Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while SRAD trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 65.60. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SRAD's competition here
LYFT vs OCTVV Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OCTVV's competition here
LYFT vs GRND-WT Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GRND-WT's competition here
LYFT vs MNDY Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while MNDY trades at $82.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MNDY's competition here
LYFT vs CVT Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CVT's competition here
LYFT vs PYCR Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PYCR's competition here
LYFT vs BTDR Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while BTDR trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BTDR's competition here
LYFT vs LIF Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while LIF trades at $46.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check LIF's competition here
LYFT vs PWSC Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PWSC's competition here
LYFT vs DAVE Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while DAVE trades at $284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DAVE's competition here
LYFT vs BOX Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while BOX trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BOX's competition here
LYFT vs STUB Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while STUB trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STUB's competition here
LYFT vs AYX Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AYX's competition here
LYFT vs ENV Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ENV's competition here
LYFT vs INST Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check INST's competition here
LYFT vs RNG Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while RNG trades at $38.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check RNG's competition here
LYFT vs ZI Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZI's competition here
LYFT vs BILL Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while BILL trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -148.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BILL's competition here
LYFT vs KC Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while KC trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -22.41. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check KC's competition here
LYFT vs ADEA Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while ADEA trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ADEA's competition here
LYFT vs NATL Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while NATL trades at $44.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NATL's competition here
LYFT vs RUM Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while RUM trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -17.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check RUM's competition here
LYFT vs PTRN Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while PTRN trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PTRN's competition here
LYFT vs PPLI Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while PPLI trades at $42.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PPLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PPLI's competition here
LYFT vs SOUN Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while SOUN trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SOUN's competition here
LYFT vs BULL Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while BULL trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BULL's competition here
LYFT vs FSLY Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while FSLY trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FSLY's competition here
LYFT vs DBD Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while DBD trades at $81.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DBD's competition here
LYFT vs QTWO Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while QTWO trades at $44.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check QTWO's competition here
LYFT vs WK Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while WK trades at $48.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 201.79. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to WK's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check WK's competition here
LYFT vs FRSH Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while FRSH trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FRSH's competition here
LYFT vs AGYS Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while AGYS trades at $90.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 65.80. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AGYS's competition here
LYFT vs DCT Comparison June 2026
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.77, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DCT's competition here