Mastercard Incorporated (MA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 623B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while V trades at $325.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas V's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check V's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 217.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while AXP trades at $318.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AXP's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while COF-PJ trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF-PJ's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while COF-PK trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF-PK's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while COF-PI trades at $17.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF-PI's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while COF-PN trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.60. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF-PN's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 114.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while COF trades at $182.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 56.40. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 112.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while COF-PL trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check COF-PL's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while BNH trades at $15.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check BNH's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check DFS's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while IX trades at $38.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check IX's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while PYPL trades at $41.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check PYPL's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while SUNB trades at $82.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SUNB's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while SYF trades at $71.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SYF's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while SYF-PB trades at $25.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SYF-PB's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while SYF-PA trades at $19.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SYF-PA's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while SOFI trades at $16.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SOFI's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while GPN trades at $63.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check GPN's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while KKRS trades at $16.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check KKRS's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while ALLY trades at $43.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ALLY's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while FCFS trades at $230.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check FCFS's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-PC's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while SLMBP trades at $74.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SLMBP's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while OMF trades at $55.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check OMF's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while CACC trades at $566.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check CACC's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while CGABL trades at $16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check CGABL's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while OBDC trades at $11.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check OBDC's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ORCC's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while JSM trades at $18.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check JSM's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while NNI trades at $130.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NNI's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while ENVA trades at $179.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ENVA's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while SLM trades at $22.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SLM's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while SEZL trades at $119.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SEZL's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while BFH trades at $94.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check BFH's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while UPST trades at $30.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 75.76. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check UPST's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ADS's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while WU trades at $7.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check WU's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while LC trades at $17.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check LC's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while AGM trades at $172.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while EZPW trades at $32.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check EZPW's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while QFIN trades at $14.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check QFIN's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while AGM-A trades at $135.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-A's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while ATLC trades at $88.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ATLC's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while FINV trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check FINV's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check MGI's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while OCSL trades at $11.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check OCSL's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 912M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while RWAYL trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check RWAYL's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 897.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while JCAP trades at $16.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check JCAP's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 889.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while RWAYI trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check RWAYI's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 885.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while BBDC trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check BBDC's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 786.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while WRLD trades at $170.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check WRLD's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while NAVI trades at $7.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -12.82. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NAVI's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 738.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while NEWTO trades at $25.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NEWTO's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 728.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while NEWTG trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NEWTG's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while GDOT trades at $12.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check GDOT's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 609.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while AGM-PD trades at $20.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-PD's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 597M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while NRDS trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NRDS's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 592.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while PRAA trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check PRAA's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 559.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while LU trades at $1.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check LU's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while QD trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check QD's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 507.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while TREE trades at $36.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check TREE's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while MCVT trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check MCVT's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 471.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while HTT trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check HTT's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while IACO trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check IACO's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 429.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while KRAQ trades at $9.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check KRAQ's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check RWAYZ's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while ATLCZ trades at $25.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ATLCZ's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 381.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while ATLCL trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ATLCL's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 362.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while ATLCP trades at $23.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ATLCP's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 347.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while LX trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check LX's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 332.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while RM trades at $36.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check RM's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 324.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while NEWTI trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NEWTI's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while LPRO trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check LPRO's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, IPFX has a market cap of 235.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while IPFX trades at $10.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas IPFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to IPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check IPFX's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 229.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while MFIN trades at $9.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check MFIN's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while CURR trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check CURR's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 225M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while OPRT trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check OPRT's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 224.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while AGM-PE trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-PE's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 215.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while RWAY trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check RWAY's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 212.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while PMTS trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check PMTS's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 204.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while AGM-PF trades at $18.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-PF's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 200.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while CPSS trades at $9.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check CPSS's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 191.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while AGM-PG trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AGM-PG's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while FOA trades at $19.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check FOA's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while EMIS trades at $10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to EMIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check EMIS's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while ANTA trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ANTA's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check IFIN-WT's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check SUNL's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 132.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while AHG trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check AHG's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 109.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while YRD trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check YRD's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while NISN trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NISN's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check FOA-WT's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check ELVT's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, IPFXW has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while IPFXW trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas IPFXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to IPFXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IPFXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check IPFXW's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check NICK's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while XYF trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check XYF's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while OMCC trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check OMCC's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, KRAQW has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while KRAQW trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas KRAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to KRAQW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to KRAQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check KRAQW's competition here

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 437.6B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $496.23, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.64, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +2.06%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.Check JT's competition here