The Macerich Company (MAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAC | $24.54 | +4.90% | 6.9B | -34.35 | -$0.71 | +2.80% |
| SPG | $213.91 | +3.17% | 68.7B | 14.72 | $14.39 | +4.15% |
| SPG-PJ | $55.75 | -0.09% | 57.2B | 8.17 | $6.78 | +4.15% |
| O | $62.26 | +3.74% | 57.1B | 50.20 | $1.22 | +5.29% |
| KIM-PN | $63.13 | +4.35% | 40.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.08% |
| KIM | $25.64 | +5.75% | 17B | 28.95 | $0.87 | +4.08% |
| KIM-PM | $19.96 | +0.10% | 17B | 12.13 | $1.65 | +4.08% |
| KIM-PL | $19.68 | +0.31% | 16.8B | 11.88 | $1.65 | +4.08% |
| REG | $80.42 | +3.68% | 14.6B | 27.34 | $2.91 | +3.67% |
| FRT | $124.78 | +2.19% | 10.8B | 21.57 | $5.77 | +3.60% |
Stock Comparison
MAC vs SPG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while SPG trades at $213.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SPG's competition here
MAC vs SPG-PJ Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while SPG-PJ trades at $55.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
MAC vs O Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while O trades at $62.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas O's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check O's competition here
MAC vs KIM-PN Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while KIM-PN trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM-PN's competition here
MAC vs KIM Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while KIM trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM's competition here
MAC vs KIM-PM Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while KIM-PM trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM-PM's competition here
MAC vs KIM-PL Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while KIM-PL trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KIM-PL's competition here
MAC vs REG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while REG trades at $80.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check REG's competition here
MAC vs FRT Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while FRT trades at $124.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check FRT's competition here
MAC vs BRX Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while BRX trades at $32.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BRX's competition here
MAC vs ADC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while ADC trades at $75.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 40.30. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ADC's competition here
MAC vs ADC-PA Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while ADC-PA trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ADC-PA's competition here
MAC vs NNN Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while NNN trades at $46.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check NNN's competition here
MAC vs FRT-PC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while FRT-PC trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check FRT-PC's competition here
MAC vs KRG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while KRG trades at $29.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check KRG's competition here
MAC vs PECO Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while PECO trades at $42.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 45.35. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PECO's competition here
MAC vs SKT Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while SKT trades at $39.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SKT's competition here
MAC vs REGCP Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while REGCP trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check REGCP's competition here
MAC vs REGCO Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while REGCO trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check REGCO's competition here
MAC vs CURB Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while CURB trades at $30.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 99.27. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CURB's competition here
MAC vs AKR Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while AKR trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 72.68. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check AKR's competition here
MAC vs FCPT Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while FCPT trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check FCPT's competition here
MAC vs IVT Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while IVT trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check IVT's competition here
MAC vs ROIC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ROIC's competition here
MAC vs GTY Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while GTY trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check GTY's competition here
MAC vs NTST Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while NTST trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 169.00. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check NTST's competition here
MAC vs CBL Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while CBL trades at $50.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CBL's competition here
MAC vs ALEX Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ALEX's competition here
MAC vs ALX Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while ALX trades at $267.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 66.37. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check ALX's competition here
MAC vs RPT-PD Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check RPT-PD's competition here
MAC vs WSR Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 979.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while WSR trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WSR's competition here
MAC vs BFS Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 918.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while BFS trades at $38.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BFS's competition here
MAC vs UBP Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBP's competition here
MAC vs UBA Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBA's competition here
MAC vs UBP-PK Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBP-PK's competition here
MAC vs BFS-PD Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 785.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while BFS-PD trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BFS-PD's competition here
MAC vs UBP-PH Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check UBP-PH's competition here
MAC vs BFS-PE Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 553M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while BFS-PE trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BFS-PE's competition here
MAC vs RVI Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 480.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while RVI trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -45.36. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check RVI's competition here
MAC vs SITC-PA Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SITC-PA's competition here
MAC vs PINE Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 326M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while PINE trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -246.62. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PINE's competition here
MAC vs CDR-PB Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while CDR-PB trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CDR-PB's competition here
MAC vs SITC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while SITC trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SITC's competition here
MAC vs CDR-PC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 265.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while CDR-PC trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CDR-PC's competition here
MAC vs SRG-PA Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while SRG-PA trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SRG-PA's competition here
MAC vs SRG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while SRG trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check SRG's competition here
MAC vs WHLRL Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while WHLRL trades at $82.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -44.16. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLRL's competition here
MAC vs WHLRP Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while WHLRP trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLRP's competition here
MAC vs WHLRD Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while WHLRD trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -20.64. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLRD's competition here
MAC vs WHLR Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 60K. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while WHLR trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WHLR's competition here
MAC vs NNN-PF Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check NNN-PF's competition here
MAC vs CDR Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check CDR's competition here
MAC vs PEI Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEI's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI's competition here
MAC vs EQY Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check EQY's competition here
MAC vs PEI-PD Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI-PD's competition here
MAC vs BPYU Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BPYU's competition here
MAC vs BPYUP Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check BPYUP's competition here
MAC vs PEI-PC Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI-PC's competition here
MAC vs PEI-PB Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check PEI-PB's competition here
MAC vs WPG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WPG's competition here
MAC vs HMG Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check HMG's competition here
MAC vs WRI Comparison June 2026
MAC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAC stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAC is priced at $24.54, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAC currently has a P/E ratio of -34.35, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAC's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAC is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAC.Check WRI's competition here