The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. (NAPA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAPA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAPA | $11.09 | -0.18% | 1.6B | 27.73 | $0.40 | N/A |
| DEO | $80.74 | +0.62% | 44.7B | 18.56 | $4.33 | +4.12% |
| STZ | $141.55 | +0.50% | 24.1B | 14.58 | $9.61 | +2.92% |
| BF-A | $26.99 | +0.11% | 12.6B | 17.71 | $1.53 | +3.47% |
| BF-B | $26.56 | +0.45% | 12.5B | 17.46 | $1.53 | +3.47% |
| RYZ | $28.99 | +4.58% | 1.2B | -18.95 | -$1.51 | +2.62% |
| MGPI | $16.69 | +1.15% | 352.6M | -1.48 | -$11.15 | +2.90% |
| AGCC | $14.83 | -0.47% | 346.4M | 380.00 | $0.04 | N/A |
| EPSM | $1.90 | +59.66% | 34.5M | -21.42 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| WVVIP | $2.52 | +0.70% | 13.9M | 19.33 | $0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NAPA vs DEO Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DEO has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while DEO trades at $80.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas DEO's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to DEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check DEO's competition here
NAPA vs STZ Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STZ has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while STZ trades at $141.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas STZ's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to STZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check STZ's competition here
NAPA vs BF-A Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BF-A has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while BF-A trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas BF-A's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BF-A's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to BF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check BF-A's competition here
NAPA vs BF-B Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BF-B has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while BF-B trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas BF-B's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BF-B's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to BF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check BF-B's competition here
NAPA vs RYZ Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RYZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while RYZ trades at $28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas RYZ's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RYZ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to RYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check RYZ's competition here
NAPA vs MGPI Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MGPI has a market cap of 352.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while MGPI trades at $16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas MGPI's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MGPI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to MGPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check MGPI's competition here
NAPA vs AGCC Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AGCC has a market cap of 346.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while AGCC trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas AGCC's P/E ratio is 380.00. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGCC's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to AGCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check AGCC's competition here
NAPA vs EPSM Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EPSM has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while EPSM trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas EPSM's P/E ratio is -21.42. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EPSM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to EPSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check EPSM's competition here
NAPA vs WVVIP Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WVVIP has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while WVVIP trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas WVVIP's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WVVIP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to WVVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check WVVIP's competition here
NAPA vs WVVI Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WVVI has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while WVVI trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas WVVI's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WVVI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to WVVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check WVVI's competition here
NAPA vs BLNE Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BLNE has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while BLNE trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas BLNE's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLNE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to BLNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check BLNE's competition here
NAPA vs AMSS Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMSS has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while AMSS trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas AMSS's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to AMSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check AMSS's competition here
NAPA vs VINE Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VINE has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while VINE trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas VINE's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VINE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to VINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check VINE's competition here
NAPA vs LQR Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LQR has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while LQR trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas LQR's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LQR's ROE of -3.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to LQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check LQR's competition here
NAPA vs EAST Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EAST has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while EAST trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas EAST's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EAST's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to EAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check EAST's competition here
NAPA vs VWE Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VWE has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while VWE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas VWE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VWE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to VWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check VWE's competition here
NAPA vs VWEWW Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VWEWW has a market cap of 567.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while VWEWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas VWEWW's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VWEWW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to VWEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check VWEWW's competition here
NAPA vs IBG Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IBG has a market cap of 398.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while IBG trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas IBG's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IBG's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to IBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check IBG's competition here
NAPA vs STZ-B Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STZ-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while STZ-B trades at $310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas STZ-B's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STZ-B's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to STZ-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check STZ-B's competition here
NAPA vs WBEV Comparison June 2026
NAPA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAPA stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAPA is priced at $11.09, while WBEV trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAPA currently has a P/E ratio of 27.73, whereas WBEV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, NAPA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WBEV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAPA is less volatile compared to WBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAPA.Check WBEV's competition here