Navistar International Corporation (NAV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAV | $44.50 | +0.16% | 0 | -23.25 | -$1.91 | N/A |
| CAT | $860.81 | -5.99% | 421.3B | 45.61 | $20.05 | +0.66% |
| DE | $566.95 | -1.17% | 155.9B | 32.68 | $17.67 | +1.12% |
| CNHI | $11.45 | -0.61% | 14.4B | 6.66 | $1.72 | +4.10% |
| CNH | $10.44 | -2.25% | 13.3B | 33.56 | $0.32 | +0.93% |
| AGCO | $109.63 | -5.20% | 8.2B | 10.91 | $10.37 | +1.04% |
| TEX | $61.08 | -2.58% | 4.7B | 31.06 | $2.05 | +1.06% |
| REVG | $63.90 | -1.99% | 3.1B | 33.81 | $1.89 | +0.38% |
| ALG | $152.65 | +1.31% | 1.9B | 18.28 | $8.36 | +0.83% |
| LNN | $114.96 | +1.65% | 1.2B | 21.01 | $5.46 | +1.29% |
Stock Comparison
NAV vs CAT Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 421.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CAT trades at $860.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 45.61. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CAT's competition here
NAV vs DE Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 155.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while DE trades at $566.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check DE's competition here
NAV vs CNHI Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CNHI trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CNHI's competition here
NAV vs CNH Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CNH trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CNH's competition here
NAV vs AGCO Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while AGCO trades at $109.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGCO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check AGCO's competition here
NAV vs TEX Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while TEX trades at $61.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check TEX's competition here
NAV vs REVG Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while REVG trades at $63.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check REVG's competition here
NAV vs ALG Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while ALG trades at $152.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check ALG's competition here
NAV vs LNN Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while LNN trades at $114.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check LNN's competition here
NAV vs ASTE Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while ASTE trades at $50.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 46.16. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check ASTE's competition here
NAV vs HY Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 620M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while HY trades at $34.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check HY's competition here
NAV vs TWI Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 480.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while TWI trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check TWI's competition here
NAV vs SHYF Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 439M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while SHYF trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 627.00. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHYF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is more volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check SHYF's competition here
NAV vs MTW Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 432.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while MTW trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 57.38. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check MTW's competition here
NAV vs CMCO Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 365.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CMCO trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CMCO's competition here
NAV vs WNC Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 322.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while WNC trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check WNC's competition here
NAV vs GENC Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 218.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while GENC trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check GENC's competition here
NAV vs MNTX Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while MNTX trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check MNTX's competition here
NAV vs RYM Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, RYM has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while RYM trades at $27.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas RYM's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RYM's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to RYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check RYM's competition here
NAV vs LEV Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while LEV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check LEV's competition here
NAV vs XOS Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while XOS trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XOS's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check XOS's competition here
NAV vs XOSWW Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while XOSWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check XOSWW's competition here
NAV vs NKLA Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while NKLA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check NKLA's competition here
NAV vs ARTW Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while ARTW trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check ARTW's competition here
NAV vs ZEV Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while ZEV trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check ZEV's competition here
NAV vs CEAD Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CEAD trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEAD's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CEAD's competition here
NAV vs ZDAI Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, ZDAI has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while ZDAI trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas ZDAI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZDAI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to ZDAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check ZDAI's competition here
NAV vs HYFM Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while HYFM trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check HYFM's competition here
NAV vs UGRO Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while UGRO trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check UGRO's competition here
NAV vs IDEX Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while IDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check IDEX's competition here
NAV vs CEADW Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 19.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CEADW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEADW's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CEADW's competition here
NAV vs JOY Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, JOY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while JOY trades at $28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas JOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JOY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV and JOY have similar daily volatility (0.07).Check JOY's competition here
NAV vs ZEV-WT Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, ZEV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while ZEV-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas ZEV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZEV-WT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to ZEV-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check ZEV-WT's competition here
NAV vs BLT Comparison June 2026
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, BLT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while BLT trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas BLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to BLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check BLT's competition here