Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWL | $4.65 | +10.45% | 1.9B | -6.58 | -$0.67 | +6.16% |
| PG | $149.48 | +3.02% | 345.9B | 21.72 | $6.84 | +2.87% |
| UL | $58.14 | +3.65% | 124.7B | 19.13 | $3.01 | +3.96% |
| CL | $88.57 | +2.90% | 70.2B | 34.03 | $2.58 | +2.38% |
| KVUE | $17.97 | +2.39% | 34.4B | 21.32 | $0.84 | +4.65% |
| KMB | $100.94 | +3.26% | 33.4B | 19.44 | $5.17 | +5.07% |
| EL | $87.99 | +3.95% | 31.3B | -123.70 | -$0.70 | +1.60% |
| CHD | $98.05 | +2.83% | 23B | 31.92 | $3.04 | +1.25% |
| SGI | $70.40 | +3.82% | 14.9B | 28.39 | $2.50 | +0.90% |
| CLX | $99.74 | +4.81% | 11.9B | 16.01 | $6.15 | +5.05% |
Stock Comparison
NWL vs PG Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 345.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while PG trades at $149.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PG's competition here
NWL vs UL Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 124.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while UL trades at $58.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check UL's competition here
NWL vs CL Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while CL trades at $88.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 34.03. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CL's competition here
NWL vs KVUE Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while KVUE trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check KVUE's competition here
NWL vs KMB Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while KMB trades at $100.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check KMB's competition here
NWL vs EL Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while EL trades at $87.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -123.70. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EL's competition here
NWL vs CHD Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while CHD trades at $98.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CHD's competition here
NWL vs SGI Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while SGI trades at $70.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SGI's competition here
NWL vs CLX Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while CLX trades at $99.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLX's ROE of +28.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check CLX's competition here
NWL vs NTCO Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check NTCO's competition here
NWL vs ELF Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while ELF trades at $59.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 126.57. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check ELF's competition here
NWL vs IPAR Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while IPAR trades at $97.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check IPAR's competition here
NWL vs SPB Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while SPB trades at $82.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SPB's competition here
NWL vs COTY Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while COTY trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check COTY's competition here
NWL vs EPC Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 954.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while EPC trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EPC's competition here
NWL vs HELE Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 627.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while HELE trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check HELE's competition here
NWL vs EWCZ Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while EWCZ trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check EWCZ's competition here
NWL vs NUS Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 264.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while NUS trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check NUS's competition here
NWL vs PTNM Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PTNM's competition here
NWL vs ACU Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while ACU trades at $44.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check ACU's competition here
NWL vs SLSN Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while SLSN trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 122.00. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SLSN's competition here
NWL vs SKIN Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while SKIN trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SKIN's competition here
NWL vs GROV Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while GROV trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check GROV's competition here
NWL vs AXIL Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while AXIL trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 52.67. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check AXIL's competition here
NWL vs UG Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while UG trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check UG's competition here
NWL vs MTEX Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while MTEX trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -23.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check MTEX's competition here
NWL vs PHH Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check PHH's competition here
NWL vs RAY Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while RAY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check RAY's competition here
NWL vs DSY Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while DSY trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check DSY's competition here
NWL vs BRSH Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check BRSH's competition here
NWL vs TANH Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while TANH trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check TANH's competition here
NWL vs TKLF Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 842.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while TKLF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check TKLF's competition here
NWL vs DSYWW Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DSYWW has a market cap of 750.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while DSYWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas DSYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSYWW's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to DSYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check DSYWW's competition here
NWL vs BRSHW Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check BRSHW's competition here
NWL vs REV Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check REV's competition here
NWL vs SUMR Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check SUMR's competition here
NWL vs GROV-WT Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check GROV-WT's competition here
NWL vs RDEN Comparison June 2026
NWL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NWL stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NWL is priced at $4.65, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NWL currently has a P/E ratio of -6.58, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NWL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NWL is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NWL.Check RDEN's competition here