Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PWR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | $648.75 | -6.49% | 103.8B | 94.90 | $7.29 | +0.06% |
| FIX | $1,724.01 | -6.91% | 64.5B | 52.82 | $34.67 | +0.14% |
| FER | $64.51 | -2.29% | 47.4B | 48.75 | $1.35 | +2.51% |
| EME | $785.85 | -4.61% | 36.8B | 27.82 | $29.74 | +0.16% |
| MTZ | $335.53 | -7.24% | 27.9B | 61.83 | $5.71 | N/A |
| STRL | $783.55 | -12.14% | 25.8B | 75.11 | $11.21 | N/A |
| APG | $42.57 | +0.86% | 18.9B | -68.27 | -$0.64 | N/A |
| J | $124.75 | +3.99% | 14.8B | 37.00 | $3.39 | +1.10% |
| IESC | $678.71 | -7.65% | 14.5B | 38.76 | $18.74 | N/A |
| DY | $444.93 | -3.04% | 13.6B | 43.26 | $10.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PWR vs FIX Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, FIX has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while FIX trades at $1,724.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas FIX's P/E ratio is 52.82. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIX's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FIX's competition here
PWR vs FER Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, FER has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while FER trades at $64.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas FER's P/E ratio is 48.75. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FER's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to FER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FER's competition here
PWR vs EME Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, EME has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while EME trades at $785.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas EME's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EME's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to EME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check EME's competition here
PWR vs MTZ Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, MTZ has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while MTZ trades at $335.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas MTZ's P/E ratio is 61.83. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MTZ's competition here
PWR vs STRL Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, STRL has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while STRL trades at $783.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas STRL's P/E ratio is 75.11. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STRL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to STRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check STRL's competition here
PWR vs APG Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, APG has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while APG trades at $42.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas APG's P/E ratio is -68.27. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to APG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check APG's competition here
PWR vs J Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, J has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while J trades at $124.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas J's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to J's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to J. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check J's competition here
PWR vs IESC Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, IESC has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while IESC trades at $678.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas IESC's P/E ratio is 38.76. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IESC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to IESC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IESC's competition here
PWR vs DY Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, DY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while DY trades at $444.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas DY's P/E ratio is 43.26. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to DY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check DY's competition here
PWR vs BLD Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, BLD has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while BLD trades at $394.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas BLD's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BLD's competition here
PWR vs LGN Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, LGN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while LGN trades at $82.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas LGN's P/E ratio is -259.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to LGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check LGN's competition here
PWR vs ACM Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ACM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while ACM trades at $69.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas ACM's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ACM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ACM's competition here
PWR vs AGX Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, AGX has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while AGX trades at $591.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas AGX's P/E ratio is 53.87. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AGX's competition here
PWR vs STN Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, STN has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while STN trades at $72.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas STN's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to STN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check STN's competition here
PWR vs ECG Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ECG has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while ECG trades at $137.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas ECG's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECG's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to ECG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ECG's competition here
PWR vs TTEK Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, TTEK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while TTEK trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas TTEK's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTEK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to TTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check TTEK's competition here
PWR vs FLR Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, FLR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while FLR trades at $48.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas FLR's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to FLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FLR's competition here
PWR vs MYRG Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, MYRG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while MYRG trades at $410.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas MYRG's P/E ratio is 46.58. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MYRG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MYRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MYRG's competition here
PWR vs ROAD Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ROAD has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while ROAD trades at $105.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas ROAD's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ROAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ROAD's competition here
PWR vs GVA Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, GVA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while GVA trades at $137.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas GVA's P/E ratio is 38.25. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to GVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check GVA's competition here
PWR vs PRIM Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, PRIM has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while PRIM trades at $95.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas PRIM's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRIM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to PRIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check PRIM's competition here
PWR vs KBR Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, KBR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while KBR trades at $34.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas KBR's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to KBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check KBR's competition here
PWR vs TPC Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, TPC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while TPC trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas TPC's P/E ratio is 47.97. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to TPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check TPC's competition here
PWR vs NVEE Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, NVEE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while NVEE trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas NVEE's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NVEE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to NVEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check NVEE's competition here
PWR vs WLDN Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, WLDN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while WLDN trades at $98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas WLDN's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLDN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to WLDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLDN's competition here
PWR vs AMRC Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, AMRC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while AMRC trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas AMRC's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMRC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to AMRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AMRC's competition here
PWR vs JUNE Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, JUNE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while JUNE trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas JUNE's P/E ratio is -112.26. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUNE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to JUNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check JUNE's competition here
PWR vs GLDD Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, GLDD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while GLDD trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas GLDD's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLDD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to GLDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check GLDD's competition here
PWR vs LMB Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, LMB has a market cap of 976.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while LMB trades at $79.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas LMB's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to LMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check LMB's competition here
PWR vs JLHL Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, JLHL has a market cap of 583.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while JLHL trades at $29.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas JLHL's P/E ratio is 150.53. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JLHL's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to JLHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check JLHL's competition here
PWR vs BWMN Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, BWMN has a market cap of 564.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while BWMN trades at $31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas BWMN's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BWMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BWMN's competition here
PWR vs ORN Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ORN has a market cap of 561.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while ORN trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas ORN's P/E ratio is 63.02. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ORN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ORN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ORN's competition here
PWR vs BBCP Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, BBCP has a market cap of 539.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while BBCP trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas BBCP's P/E ratio is 76.50. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBCP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BBCP's competition here
PWR vs MTRX Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, MTRX has a market cap of 373.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while MTRX trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas MTRX's P/E ratio is -25.08. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MTRX's competition here
PWR vs WXM Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, WXM has a market cap of 295.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while WXM trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas WXM's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WXM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to WXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WXM's competition here
PWR vs ESOA Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ESOA has a market cap of 289M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while ESOA trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas ESOA's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESOA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ESOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ESOA's competition here
PWR vs VATE Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, VATE has a market cap of 229M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while VATE trades at $16.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas VATE's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VATE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to VATE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check VATE's competition here
PWR vs MAGH Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, MAGH has a market cap of 225.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while MAGH trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas MAGH's P/E ratio is 225.33. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAGH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MAGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MAGH's competition here
PWR vs AENZ Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, AENZ has a market cap of 177.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while AENZ trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas AENZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AENZ's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AENZ's competition here
PWR vs SHIM Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, SHIM has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while SHIM trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas SHIM's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHIM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to SHIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SHIM's competition here
PWR vs CSLRW Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, CSLRW has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while CSLRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas CSLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSLRW's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to CSLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check CSLRW's competition here
PWR vs OEG Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, OEG has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while OEG trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas OEG's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OEG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OEG's competition here
PWR vs AGFY Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, AGFY has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while AGFY trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas AGFY's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGFY's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to AGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check AGFY's competition here
PWR vs SKBL Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, SKBL has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while SKBL trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas SKBL's P/E ratio is 147.50. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to SKBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SKBL's competition here
PWR vs BLNK Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, BLNK has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while BLNK trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas BLNK's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLNK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to BLNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BLNK's competition here
PWR vs SLND Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, SLND has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while SLND trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas SLND's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLND's ROE of +15.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to SLND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SLND's competition here
PWR vs DRTT Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, DRTT has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while DRTT trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas DRTT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DRTT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to DRTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check DRTT's competition here
PWR vs RITR Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, RITR has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while RITR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas RITR's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RITR's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to RITR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check RITR's competition here
PWR vs PGHL Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, PGHL has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while PGHL trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas PGHL's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PGHL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to PGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check PGHL's competition here
PWR vs MSW Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, MSW has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while MSW trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas MSW's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSW's ROE of -5.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MSW's competition here
PWR vs ONEG Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ONEG has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while ONEG trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas ONEG's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ONEG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ONEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ONEG's competition here
PWR vs SUNE Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, SUNE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while SUNE trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas SUNE's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUNE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to SUNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SUNE's competition here
PWR vs WLMS Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, WLMS has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while WLMS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas WLMS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLMS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to WLMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLMS's competition here
PWR vs SKK Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, SKK has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while SKK trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas SKK's P/E ratio is -32.87. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to SKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check SKK's competition here
PWR vs MIMI Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, MIMI has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while MIMI trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas MIMI's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIMI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to MIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MIMI's competition here
PWR vs FBGL Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, FBGL has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while FBGL trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas FBGL's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBGL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FBGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FBGL's competition here
PWR vs ENG Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ENG has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while ENG trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas ENG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ENG's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to ENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check ENG's competition here
PWR vs OFAL Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, OFAL has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while OFAL trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas OFAL's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OFAL's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to OFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OFAL's competition here
PWR vs MGN Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, MGN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while MGN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas MGN's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to MGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check MGN's competition here
PWR vs OIG Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, OIG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while OIG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas OIG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OIG's ROE of +12.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to OIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check OIG's competition here
PWR vs BNC Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, BNC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while BNC trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas BNC's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNC's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to BNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check BNC's competition here
PWR vs WLGS Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, WLGS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while WLGS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas WLGS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLGS's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to WLGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check WLGS's competition here
PWR vs FGL Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, FGL has a market cap of 326.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while FGL trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas FGL's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to FGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check FGL's competition here
PWR vs IEA Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, IEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while IEA trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas IEA's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IEA's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to IEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IEA's competition here
PWR vs HIL Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, HIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while HIL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas HIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to HIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check HIL's competition here
PWR vs CBI Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, CBI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while CBI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas CBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CBI's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is more volatile compared to CBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check CBI's competition here
PWR vs SCCI Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, SCCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while SCCI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas SCCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCCI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. PWR has daily volatility of 7.16 and SCCI has daily volatility of N/A.Check SCCI's competition here
PWR vs IEAWW Comparison June 2026
PWR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWR stands at 103.8B. In comparison, IEAWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWR is priced at $648.75, while IEAWW trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWR currently has a P/E ratio of 94.90, whereas IEAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IEAWW's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PWR is less volatile compared to IEAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWR.Check IEAWW's competition here