Rent-A-Center, Inc. (RCII) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RCII) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Rental & Leasing Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCII | $26.78 | -0.11% | 1.5B | 81.15 | $0.33 | +5.08% |
| URI | $1,094.17 | +0.93% | 68.5B | 28.00 | $39.08 | +0.69% |
| FTAI | $233.75 | +1.43% | 24B | 46.66 | $5.01 | +0.65% |
| FTAIM | $26.71 | +0.21% | 23.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.65% |
| FTAIN | $24.97 | -0.04% | 23.6B | -7.20 | -$3.47 | +0.65% |
| AER | $139.02 | +2.44% | 21.9B | 6.10 | $22.79 | +0.96% |
| CTOS-WT | $0.11 | -7.93% | 18B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UHAL | $61.76 | +3.75% | 11.8B | 257.88 | $0.24 | N/A |
| UHAL-B | $54.99 | +3.44% | 10.8B | 229.08 | $0.24 | N/A |
| R | $276.95 | +2.22% | 10.7B | 22.98 | $12.04 | +1.32% |
Stock Comparison
RCII vs URI Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, URI has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while URI trades at $1,094.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas URI's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to URI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to URI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check URI's competition here
RCII vs FTAI Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAI trades at $233.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAI's P/E ratio is 46.66. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTAI's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to FTAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check FTAI's competition here
RCII vs FTAIM Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIM has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAIM trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTAIM's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check FTAIM's competition here
RCII vs FTAIN Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIN has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAIN trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAIN's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTAIN's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check FTAIN's competition here
RCII vs AER Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AER has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while AER trades at $139.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas AER's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AER's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to AER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check AER's competition here
RCII vs CTOS-WT Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTOS-WT has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while CTOS-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas CTOS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTOS-WT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to CTOS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check CTOS-WT's competition here
RCII vs UHAL Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UHAL has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while UHAL trades at $61.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas UHAL's P/E ratio is 257.88. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UHAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to UHAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check UHAL's competition here
RCII vs UHAL-B Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UHAL-B has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while UHAL-B trades at $54.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas UHAL-B's P/E ratio is 229.08. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UHAL-B's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to UHAL-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check UHAL-B's competition here
RCII vs R Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, R has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while R trades at $276.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas R's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to R's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to R. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check R's competition here
RCII vs AL Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while AL trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas AL's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to AL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check AL's competition here
RCII vs CAR Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CAR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while CAR trades at $181.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas CAR's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to CAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check CAR's competition here
RCII vs GATX Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GATX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while GATX trades at $175.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas GATX's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GATX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to GATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check GATX's competition here
RCII vs AL-PA Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AL-PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while AL-PA trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas AL-PA's P/E ratio is -26.35. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AL-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to AL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check AL-PA's competition here
RCII vs EQPT Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EQPT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while EQPT trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas EQPT's P/E ratio is 221.67. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to EQPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check EQPT's competition here
RCII vs HRI Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HRI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while HRI trades at $149.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas HRI's P/E ratio is -2998.20. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HRI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to HRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check HRI's competition here
RCII vs WSC Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WSC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while WSC trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas WSC's P/E ratio is -74.41. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WSC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to WSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check WSC's competition here
RCII vs TRTN Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN trades at $79.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRTN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check TRTN's competition here
RCII vs HEES Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HEES has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while HEES trades at $94.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas HEES's P/E ratio is 38.01. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HEES's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to HEES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check HEES's competition here
RCII vs PONY Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PONY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while PONY trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas PONY's P/E ratio is -24.54. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PONY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to PONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check PONY's competition here
RCII vs MGRC Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MGRC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while MGRC trades at $112.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas MGRC's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGRC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to MGRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check MGRC's competition here
RCII vs FTAIO Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAIO trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAIO's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTAIO's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check FTAIO's competition here
RCII vs TRTN-PA Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN-PA trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN-PA's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRTN-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check TRTN-PA's competition here
RCII vs FTAIP Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAIP trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAIP's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTAIP's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check FTAIP's competition here
RCII vs TRTN-PB Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN-PB trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN-PB's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRTN-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check TRTN-PB's competition here
RCII vs TRTN-PC Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN-PC trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN-PC's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRTN-PC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check TRTN-PC's competition here
RCII vs CTOS Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTOS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while CTOS trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas CTOS's P/E ratio is -131.50. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTOS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to CTOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check CTOS's competition here
RCII vs TRTN-PD Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN-PD trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN-PD's P/E ratio is 2.83. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRTN-PD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check TRTN-PD's competition here
RCII vs TGH Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TGH trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TGH's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check TGH's competition here
RCII vs TRTN-PE Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN-PE trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN-PE's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRTN-PE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check TRTN-PE's competition here
RCII vs VSTS Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VSTS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while VSTS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas VSTS's P/E ratio is -99.04. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSTS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to VSTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check VSTS's competition here
RCII vs HTZ Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HTZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while HTZ trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas HTZ's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTZ's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to HTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check HTZ's competition here
RCII vs HTZWW Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HTZWW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while HTZWW trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas HTZWW's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HTZWW's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to HTZWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check HTZWW's competition here
RCII vs PRG Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while PRG trades at $36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to PRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check PRG's competition here
RCII vs WLFC Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WLFC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while WLFC trades at $184.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas WLFC's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WLFC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to WLFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check WLFC's competition here
RCII vs TGH-PA Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGH-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TGH-PA trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TGH-PA's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGH-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TGH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check TGH-PA's competition here
RCII vs TGH-PB Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGH-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TGH-PB trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TGH-PB's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGH-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TGH-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check TGH-PB's competition here
RCII vs GMTA Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GMTA has a market cap of 969.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while GMTA trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas GMTA's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to GMTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check GMTA's competition here
RCII vs ALTG-PA Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALTG-PA has a market cap of 821.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ALTG-PA trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ALTG-PA's P/E ratio is -41.39. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALTG-PA's ROE of -32.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to ALTG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check ALTG-PA's competition here
RCII vs AAN Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AAN has a market cap of 318.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while AAN trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas AAN's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to AAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check AAN's competition here
RCII vs ALTG Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALTG has a market cap of 210.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ALTG trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ALTG's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALTG's ROE of -32.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to ALTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check ALTG's competition here
RCII vs MTMT Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTMT has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while MTMT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas MTMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTMT's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to MTMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check MTMT's competition here
RCII vs MPU Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MPU has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while MPU trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas MPU's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPU's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to MPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check MPU's competition here
RCII vs TLIH Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TLIH has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TLIH trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TLIH's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TLIH's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to TLIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check TLIH's competition here
RCII vs MWG Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MWG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while MWG trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas MWG's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MWG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to MWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check MWG's competition here
RCII vs BRDS Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BRDS has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while BRDS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas BRDS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRDS's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to BRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check BRDS's competition here
RCII vs ZCAR Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZCAR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ZCAR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ZCAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZCAR's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to ZCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check ZCAR's competition here
RCII vs HYRE Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HYRE has a market cap of 486.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while HYRE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas HYRE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYRE's ROE of -46.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to HYRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check HYRE's competition here
RCII vs ZCARW Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZCARW has a market cap of 73.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ZCARW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ZCARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZCARW's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to ZCARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check ZCARW's competition here
RCII vs FPAY Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FPAY has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FPAY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FPAY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FPAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check FPAY's competition here
RCII vs FTAI-PA Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAI-PA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAI-PA's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTAI-PA's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check FTAI-PA's competition here
RCII vs FTAI-PB Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAI-PB trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAI-PB's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTAI-PB's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check FTAI-PB's competition here
RCII vs GFNCP Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GFNCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while GFNCP trades at $101.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas GFNCP's P/E ratio is 146.89. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GFNCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to GFNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check GFNCP's competition here
RCII vs BRDS-WT Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BRDS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while BRDS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas BRDS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRDS-WT's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to BRDS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check BRDS-WT's competition here
RCII vs FTAI-PC Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAI-PC trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAI-PC's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTAI-PC's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check FTAI-PC's competition here
RCII vs NEFF Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NEFF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while NEFF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas NEFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEFF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to NEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check NEFF's competition here
RCII vs ELRC Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ELRC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ELRC trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ELRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to ELRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check ELRC's competition here
RCII vs ACY Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ACY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ACY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ACY's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACY's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to ACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check ACY's competition here
RCII vs UHALB Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UHALB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while UHALB trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas UHALB's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UHALB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to UHALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.Check UHALB's competition here
RCII vs UHALV Comparison June 2026
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UHALV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while UHALV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas UHALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UHALV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RCII has daily volatility of 7.26 and UHALV has daily volatility of N/A.Check UHALV's competition here