Reliance Communications Limited (RCOM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RCOM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCOM.NS | ₹0.94 | -4.08% | 2.7B | -0.54 | -₹1.80 | N/A |
| BHARTIARTL.NS | ₹1,775.20 | -2.10% | 11T | 40.50 | ₹44.42 | +0.89% |
| BHARTIARTL.BO | ₹1,775.40 | -2.22% | 11T | 40.58 | ₹44.30 | +0.89% |
| IDEA.NS | ₹13.88 | -3.61% | 1.5T | 4.40 | ₹3.21 | N/A |
| IDEA.BO | ₹13.87 | -3.55% | 1.5T | 4.40 | ₹3.21 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.NS | ₹413.15 | -3.05% | 1.1T | 15.48 | ₹27.10 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.BO | ₹412.90 | -3.14% | 1.1T | 15.48 | ₹27.07 | N/A |
| BHARTIHEXA.NS | ₹1,457.20 | +0.16% | 737.9B | 42.63 | ₹34.62 | +0.68% |
| TATACOMM.NS | ₹1,978.60 | +3.82% | 563.1B | 54.15 | ₹36.49 | +1.27% |
| TATACOMM.BO | ₹1,976.40 | +3.88% | 562.9B | 36.57 | ₹54.00 | +1.27% |
Stock Comparison
RCOM.NS vs BHARTIARTL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.NS has a market cap of 11T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while BHARTIARTL.NS trades at ₹1,775.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BHARTIARTL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.50. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHARTIARTL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check BHARTIARTL.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs BHARTIARTL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.BO has a market cap of 11T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while BHARTIARTL.BO trades at ₹1,775.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BHARTIARTL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHARTIARTL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check BHARTIARTL.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs IDEA.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IDEA.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while IDEA.NS trades at ₹13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas IDEA.NS's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDEA.NS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to IDEA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check IDEA.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs IDEA.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IDEA.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while IDEA.BO trades at ₹13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas IDEA.BO's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDEA.BO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to IDEA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check IDEA.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs INDUSTOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while INDUSTOWER.NS trades at ₹413.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas INDUSTOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDUSTOWER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check INDUSTOWER.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs INDUSTOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while INDUSTOWER.BO trades at ₹412.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas INDUSTOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDUSTOWER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check INDUSTOWER.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs BHARTIHEXA.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BHARTIHEXA.NS has a market cap of 737.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while BHARTIHEXA.NS trades at ₹1,457.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BHARTIHEXA.NS's P/E ratio is 42.63. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check BHARTIHEXA.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs TATACOMM.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TATACOMM.NS has a market cap of 563.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while TATACOMM.NS trades at ₹1,978.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas TATACOMM.NS's P/E ratio is 54.15. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TATACOMM.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to TATACOMM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check TATACOMM.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs TATACOMM.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TATACOMM.BO has a market cap of 562.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while TATACOMM.BO trades at ₹1,976.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas TATACOMM.BO's P/E ratio is 36.57. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TATACOMM.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to TATACOMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check TATACOMM.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs RAILTEL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RAILTEL.BO has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while RAILTEL.BO trades at ₹302.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas RAILTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAILTEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to RAILTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check RAILTEL.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs RAILTEL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RAILTEL.NS has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while RAILTEL.NS trades at ₹302.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas RAILTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAILTEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to RAILTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check RAILTEL.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs TTML.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TTML.NS has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while TTML.NS trades at ₹42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas TTML.NS's P/E ratio is -39.41. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTML.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to TTML.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check TTML.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs TTML.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TTML.BO has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while TTML.BO trades at ₹42.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas TTML.BO's P/E ratio is -39.43. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTML.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to TTML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check TTML.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs ROUTE.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ROUTE.BO has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while ROUTE.BO trades at ₹519.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ROUTE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROUTE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to ROUTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check ROUTE.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs ROUTE.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ROUTE.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while ROUTE.NS trades at ₹518.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ROUTE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROUTE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to ROUTE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check ROUTE.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs SUBEX.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SUBEX.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while SUBEX.BO trades at ₹41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SUBEX.BO's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUBEX.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to SUBEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check SUBEX.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs MTNL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MTNL.NS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while MTNL.NS trades at ₹29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MTNL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTNL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to MTNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check MTNL.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs MTNL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MTNL.BO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while MTNL.BO trades at ₹29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MTNL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTNL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to MTNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check MTNL.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs SUYOG.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SUYOG.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while SUYOG.NS trades at ₹698.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SUYOG.NS's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUYOG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to SUYOG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check SUYOG.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs ONMOBILE.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while ONMOBILE.NS trades at ₹49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ONMOBILE.NS's P/E ratio is -46.95. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONMOBILE.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to ONMOBILE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check ONMOBILE.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs ONMOBILE.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while ONMOBILE.BO trades at ₹49.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ONMOBILE.BO's P/E ratio is -46.78. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONMOBILE.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to ONMOBILE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check ONMOBILE.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs GTL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GTL.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while GTL.NS trades at ₹8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GTL.NS's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to GTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check GTL.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs GTL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GTL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while GTL.BO trades at ₹8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GTL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to GTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check GTL.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs STML.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STML.BO has a market cap of 653.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while STML.BO trades at ₹67.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas STML.BO's P/E ratio is -81.33. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STML.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to STML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check STML.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs NETTLINX.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NETTLINX.BO has a market cap of 409.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while NETTLINX.BO trades at ₹17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas NETTLINX.BO's P/E ratio is -7.91. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NETTLINX.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to NETTLINX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check NETTLINX.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs QUADRANT.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, QUADRANT.BO has a market cap of 220.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while QUADRANT.BO trades at ₹0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas QUADRANT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QUADRANT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to QUADRANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check QUADRANT.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs UNIINFO.NS Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UNIINFO.NS has a market cap of 124.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while UNIINFO.NS trades at ₹11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas UNIINFO.NS's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNIINFO.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to UNIINFO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check UNIINFO.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs HATHWAYB.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HATHWAYB.BO has a market cap of 103.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while HATHWAYB.BO trades at ₹12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas HATHWAYB.BO's P/E ratio is -60.67. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HATHWAYB.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to HATHWAYB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check HATHWAYB.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs CITYONLINE.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CITYONLINE.BO has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while CITYONLINE.BO trades at ₹7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CITYONLINE.BO's P/E ratio is -9.28. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CITYONLINE.BO's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to CITYONLINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check CITYONLINE.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs CISTRO.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CISTRO.BO has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while CISTRO.BO trades at ₹1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CISTRO.BO's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CISTRO.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to CISTRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check CISTRO.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs KDL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KDL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.94, while KDL.BO trades at ₹760.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas KDL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to KDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check KDL.BO's competition here