Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKT | $12.65 | +2.43% | 37.2B | -439.50 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| COOP | $210.79 | -2.77% | 13.5B | 23.63 | $8.92 | +0.95% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| PFSI | $81.14 | +1.99% | 4.2B | 8.69 | $9.41 | +1.46% |
| UWMC | $2.42 | -5.66% | 3.7B | 8.23 | $0.30 | +16.19% |
| ADAMG | $25.38 | +0.22% | 2.3B | N/A | N/A | +9.80% |
| WD | $52.34 | +1.06% | 1.8B | 26.16 | $2.02 | +5.09% |
| ECPG | $80.37 | +0.09% | 1.8B | 6.43 | $12.84 | N/A |
| ADAMZ | $18.65 | +1.03% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | +9.80% |
| LADR | $10.44 | +3.21% | 1.3B | 23.61 | $0.44 | +8.90% |
Stock Comparison
RKT vs COOP Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while COOP trades at $210.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check COOP's competition here
RKT vs MMAC Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check MMAC's competition here
RKT vs PFSI Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while PFSI trades at $81.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check PFSI's competition here
RKT vs UWMC Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while UWMC trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check UWMC's competition here
RKT vs ADAMG Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while ADAMG trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMG's competition here
RKT vs WD Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while WD trades at $52.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check WD's competition here
RKT vs ECPG Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while ECPG trades at $80.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ECPG's competition here
RKT vs ADAMZ Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while ADAMZ trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ADAMZ's competition here
RKT vs LADR Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while LADR trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check LADR's competition here
RKT vs GHLD Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while GHLD trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check GHLD's competition here
RKT vs VEL Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 682.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while VEL trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check VEL's competition here
RKT vs UWMC-WT Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check UWMC-WT's competition here
RKT vs ATAX Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ATAX's competition here
RKT vs BETR Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 392.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while BETR trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BETR's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check BETR's competition here
RKT vs LDI Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 383.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while LDI trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check LDI's competition here
RKT vs BETRW Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 346M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while BETRW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check BETRW's competition here
RKT vs HMPT Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check HMPT's competition here
RKT vs ONIT Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 310.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while ONIT trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check ONIT's competition here
RKT vs SNFCA Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 214.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while SNFCA trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check SNFCA's competition here
RKT vs OCN Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while OCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check OCN's competition here
RKT vs GHI Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while GHI trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check GHI's competition here
RKT vs IOR Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while IOR trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check IOR's competition here
RKT vs CNF Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while CNF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check CNF's competition here
RKT vs IMH Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check IMH's competition here
RKT vs PAPL Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while PAPL trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check PAPL's competition here
RKT vs CSBK Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, CSBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while CSBK trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas CSBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSBK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to CSBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check CSBK's competition here
RKT vs NSM Comparison June 2026
RKT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKT stands at 37.2B. In comparison, NSM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RKT is priced at $12.65, while NSM trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKT currently has a P/E ratio of -439.50, whereas NSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKT is more volatile compared to NSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKT.Check NSM's competition here