Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RLGT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLGT | $9.01 | +0.11% | 428M | 27.70 | $0.33 | N/A |
| UPS | $105.50 | -2.05% | 91.7B | 17.45 | $6.18 | +6.09% |
| FDX | $324.96 | -1.59% | 79.2B | 17.72 | $18.73 | +1.41% |
| JBHT | $282.09 | -2.11% | 27.1B | 44.59 | $6.44 | +0.62% |
| XPO | $219.00 | -2.52% | 26.7B | 78.24 | $2.91 | N/A |
| FDXF | $182.74 | +2.22% | 23.9B | 41.56 | $4.55 | N/A |
| CHRW | $189.89 | +0.93% | 22.6B | 38.72 | $4.95 | +1.31% |
| EXPD | $164.26 | +0.50% | 21.8B | 26.88 | $6.19 | +0.95% |
| ZTO | $22.43 | +1.47% | 17.4B | 12.99 | $1.69 | +3.15% |
| LSTR | $221.26 | -1.82% | 7.6B | 61.73 | $3.62 | +1.61% |
Stock Comparison
RLGT vs UPS Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while UPS trades at $105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check UPS's competition here
RLGT vs FDX Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 79.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while FDX trades at $324.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FDX's competition here
RLGT vs JBHT Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while JBHT trades at $282.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 44.59. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check JBHT's competition here
RLGT vs XPO Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while XPO trades at $219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 78.24. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check XPO's competition here
RLGT vs FDXF Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, FDXF has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while FDXF trades at $182.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas FDXF's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FDXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to FDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FDXF's competition here
RLGT vs CHRW Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while CHRW trades at $189.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 38.72. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CHRW's competition here
RLGT vs EXPD Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while EXPD trades at $164.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check EXPD's competition here
RLGT vs ZTO Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while ZTO trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ZTO's competition here
RLGT vs LSTR Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while LSTR trades at $221.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 61.73. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check LSTR's competition here
RLGT vs GXO Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while GXO trades at $48.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 44.85. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check GXO's competition here
RLGT vs HUBG Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while HUBG trades at $44.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check HUBG's competition here
RLGT vs PBI Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while PBI trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check PBI's competition here
RLGT vs CYRX Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 765.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while CYRX trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -16.88. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CYRX's competition here
RLGT vs FWRD Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 367.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while FWRD trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FWRD's competition here
RLGT vs PAL Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 222.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while PAL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check PAL's competition here
RLGT vs SINO Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, SINO has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while SINO trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas SINO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SINO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to SINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check SINO's competition here
RLGT vs CRGO Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while CRGO trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CRGO's competition here
RLGT vs SFWL Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while SFWL trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check SFWL's competition here
RLGT vs CRGOW Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while CRGOW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CRGOW's competition here
RLGT vs AIRT Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while AIRT trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check AIRT's competition here
RLGT vs AIRTP Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while AIRTP trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check AIRTP's competition here
RLGT vs NCEW Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while NCEW trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check NCEW's competition here
RLGT vs FLX Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while FLX trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check FLX's competition here
RLGT vs PSIG Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while PSIG trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -4.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check PSIG's competition here
RLGT vs BTOC Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while BTOC trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check BTOC's competition here
RLGT vs ELOG Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while ELOG trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ELOG's competition here
RLGT vs LSH Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while LSH trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check LSH's competition here
RLGT vs GVH Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while GVH trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check GVH's competition here
RLGT vs CJMB Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while CJMB trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check CJMB's competition here
RLGT vs ATXG Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while ATXG trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ATXG's competition here
RLGT vs JYD Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while JYD trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check JYD's competition here
RLGT vs SGLY Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while SGLY trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check SGLY's competition here
RLGT vs AIRTW Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check AIRTW's competition here
RLGT vs UTIW Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, UTIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while UTIW trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas UTIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UTIW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to UTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check UTIW's competition here
RLGT vs ECHO Comparison June 2026
RLGT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLGT stands at 428M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLGT is priced at $9.01, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLGT currently has a P/E ratio of 27.70, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLGT's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLGT is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLGT.Check ECHO's competition here