Stifel Financial Corp. (SF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | $71.11 | +1.11% | 11B | 13.92 | $5.13 | +2.04% |
| MS-PQ | $25.41 | +0.08% | 334B | N/A | N/A | +1.91% |
| MS | $208.12 | -1.94% | 331.6B | 19.05 | $11.04 | +1.91% |
| GS | $1,008.96 | -3.45% | 304.5B | 18.86 | $54.74 | +1.66% |
| GS-PD | $19.12 | -0.23% | 203.8B | 0.37 | $51.53 | +1.66% |
| GS-PA | $19.39 | -0.05% | 200.3B | 0.38 | $51.53 | +1.66% |
| SCHW | $90.15 | +2.34% | 154.4B | 17.65 | $5.03 | +1.33% |
| SCHW-PJ | $17.29 | -0.35% | 153.3B | 6.27 | $2.77 | +1.33% |
| SCHW-PD | $24.26 | +0.00% | 153B | 8.74 | $2.77 | +1.33% |
| HOOD | $88.73 | +4.33% | 75.4B | 40.67 | $2.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SF vs MS-PQ Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 334B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MS-PQ trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PQ's competition here
SF vs MS Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 331.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MS trades at $208.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS's competition here
SF vs GS Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 304.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GS trades at $1,008.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS's competition here
SF vs GS-PD Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 203.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GS-PD trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PD's competition here
SF vs GS-PA Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 200.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GS-PA trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PA's competition here
SF vs SCHW Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 154.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SCHW trades at $90.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCHW's competition here
SF vs SCHW-PJ Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 153.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SCHW-PJ trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
SF vs SCHW-PD Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
SF vs HOOD Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while HOOD trades at $88.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HOOD's competition here
SF vs GS-PJ Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PJ's competition here
SF vs MS-PA Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MS-PA trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PA's competition here
SF vs MS-PI Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MS-PI trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PI's competition here
SF vs MS-PF Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MS-PF trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PF's competition here
SF vs MS-PE Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MS-PE trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PE's competition here
SF vs GS-PK Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PK's competition here
SF vs MS-PK Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MS-PK trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PK's competition here
SF vs MS-PP Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MS-PP trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PP's competition here
SF vs MS-PL Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MS-PL trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PL's competition here
SF vs RJF Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while RJF trades at $152.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RJF's competition here
SF vs MS-PO Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MS-PO trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MS-PO's competition here
SF vs NMR Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while NMR trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check NMR's competition here
SF vs LPLA Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while LPLA trades at $293.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check LPLA's competition here
SF vs CRCL Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, CRCL has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while CRCL trades at $80.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas CRCL's P/E ratio is -352.61. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRCL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CRCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CRCL's competition here
SF vs TW Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while TW trades at $100.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TW's competition here
SF vs STRD Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while STRD trades at $68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to STRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check STRD's competition here
SF vs IREN Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while IREN trades at $53.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is 70.16. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IREN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check IREN's competition here
SF vs EVR Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while EVR trades at $350.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check EVR's competition here
SF vs FUTU Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while FUTU trades at $94.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FUTU's competition here
SF vs HUT Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while HUT trades at $107.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -39.95. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HUT's competition here
SF vs WULF Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, WULF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while WULF trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas WULF's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WULF's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to WULF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check WULF's competition here
SF vs JEF Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while JEF trades at $58.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check JEF's competition here
SF vs VIRT Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while VIRT trades at $55.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check VIRT's competition here
SF vs GLXY Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GLXY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GLXY trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GLXY's P/E ratio is -136.17. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLXY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GLXY's competition here
SF vs HLI Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while HLI trades at $138.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HLI's competition here
SF vs SNEX Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SNEX trades at $125.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 21.80. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SNEX's competition here
SF vs SCE-PJ Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SCE-PJ trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
SF vs RIOT Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while RIOT trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RIOT's competition here
SF vs CIFR Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while CIFR trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CIFR's competition here
SF vs BGCG Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, BGCG has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while BGCG trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas BGCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to BGCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BGCG's competition here
SF vs BMNR Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while BMNR trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BMNR's competition here
SF vs FRHC Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while FRHC trades at $141.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 56.52. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FRHC's competition here
SF vs XP Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while XP trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check XP's competition here
SF vs GS-PC Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GS-PC trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.57. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GS-PC's competition here
SF vs GSIW Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GSIW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GSIW's competition here
SF vs PIPR Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while PIPR trades at $77.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PIPR's competition here
SF vs RJF-PA Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RJF-PA's competition here
SF vs MC Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MC trades at $68.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MC's competition here
SF vs BGC Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while BGC trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BGC's competition here
SF vs FIGR Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, FIGR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while FIGR trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas FIGR's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIGR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to FIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FIGR's competition here
SF vs MARA Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MARA trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MARA's competition here
SF vs LAZ Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while LAZ trades at $42.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check LAZ's competition here
SF vs MRX Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MRX trades at $62.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MRX's competition here
SF vs PJT Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while PJT trades at $159.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PJT's competition here
SF vs MKTX Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MKTX trades at $115.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MKTX's competition here
SF vs MIAX Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MIAX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MIAX trades at $40.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MIAX's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MIAX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MIAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MIAX's competition here
SF vs SF-PB Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SF-PB trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SF-PB's competition here
SF vs ETOR Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, ETOR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while ETOR trades at $38.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas ETOR's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ETOR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to ETOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check ETOR's competition here
SF vs SF-PC Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SF-PC trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SF-PC's competition here
SF vs BGCP Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BGCP's competition here
SF vs SF-PD Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SF-PD trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SF-PD's competition here
SF vs CIFRW Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while CIFRW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CIFRW's competition here
SF vs HKIB Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HKIB's competition here
SF vs PWP Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while PWP trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is 61.24. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PWP's competition here
SF vs BITF Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while BITF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BITF's competition here
SF vs GOLD Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GOLD trades at $41.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GOLD's competition here
SF vs AMRK Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while AMRK trades at $46.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 155.73. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check AMRK's competition here
SF vs PURR Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while PURR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PURR's competition here
SF vs COWN Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check COWN's competition here
SF vs OPY Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while OPY trades at $100.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SF and OPY have similar daily volatility (2.76).Check OPY's competition here
SF vs SBET Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SBET trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SBET's competition here
SF vs ABTC Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, ABTC has a market cap of 942.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while ABTC trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas ABTC's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABTC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to ABTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check ABTC's competition here
SF vs DFIN Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 934.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while DFIN trades at $37.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check DFIN's competition here
SF vs TIGR Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 843.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while TIGR trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TIGR's competition here
SF vs LCLN Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, LCLN has a market cap of 747.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while LCLN trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas LCLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LCLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to LCLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check LCLN's competition here
SF vs AC Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 652.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while AC trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check AC's competition here
SF vs BTBT Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 614.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while BTBT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BTBT's competition here
SF vs GEMI Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GEMI has a market cap of 544.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GEMI trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GEMI's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEMI's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GEMI's competition here
SF vs RJF-PB Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 422.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while RJF-PB trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check RJF-PB's competition here
SF vs MFH Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while MFH trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -70.63. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check MFH's competition here
SF vs FUFU Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 289.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while FUFU trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUFU's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check FUFU's competition here
SF vs GHL Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GHL's competition here
SF vs CSHR Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, CSHR has a market cap of 266.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while CSHR trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas CSHR's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSHR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to CSHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check CSHR's competition here
SF vs BTGO Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, BTGO has a market cap of 225.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while BTGO trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas BTGO's P/E ratio is -12.28. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTGO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BTGO's competition here
SF vs DEFT Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, DEFT has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while DEFT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas DEFT's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DEFT's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to DEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check DEFT's competition here
SF vs WHG Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while WHG trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check WHG's competition here
SF vs SWIN Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SWIN trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SWIN's competition here
SF vs AXG Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, AXG has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while AXG trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas AXG's P/E ratio is -16.48. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to AXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check AXG's competition here
SF vs SUIG Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SUIG trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SUIG's competition here
SF vs SRL Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SRL trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -43.79. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SRL's competition here
SF vs TCJH Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check TCJH's competition here
SF vs SIEB Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SIEB trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is -13.14. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SIEB's competition here
SF vs NAKA Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, NAKA has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while NAKA trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas NAKA's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAKA's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to NAKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check NAKA's competition here
SF vs GRDI Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRDI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check GRDI's competition here
SF vs BTCS Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while BTCS trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check BTCS's competition here
SF vs DOMH Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, DOMH has a market cap of 52.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while DOMH trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas DOMH's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOMH's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to DOMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check DOMH's competition here
SF vs ADEX-WT Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, ADEX-WT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while ADEX-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas ADEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADEX-WT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is less volatile compared to ADEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check ADEX-WT's competition here
SF vs PLUT Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while PLUT trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check PLUT's competition here
SF vs HGBL Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while HGBL trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check HGBL's competition here
SF vs SDIG Comparison June 2026
SF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SF stands at 11B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, SF is priced at $71.11, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.92, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, SF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SF is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SF.Check SDIG's competition here