SFL Corporation Ltd. (SFL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFL | $11.24 | +2.14% | 1.5B | 46.27 | $0.24 | +7.39% |
| KEX | $141.55 | -0.06% | 7.7B | 22.01 | $6.50 | N/A |
| MATX | $194.76 | +1.32% | 5.9B | 14.42 | $13.49 | +0.74% |
| HAFN | $7.39 | +1.51% | 3.7B | 8.12 | $0.90 | +10.03% |
| CMBT | $15.09 | +4.68% | 3.4B | 8.44 | $1.74 | +5.82% |
| BWLP | $21.99 | +5.77% | 3.2B | 8.97 | $2.38 | +6.89% |
| ZIM | $25.52 | -0.16% | 3.1B | 31.11 | $0.82 | +7.74% |
| SBLK | $26.78 | +0.22% | 3B | 21.40 | $1.25 | +2.16% |
| SB-PC | $25.60 | -2.10% | 2.7B | 17.34 | $1.51 | +3.02% |
| SB-PD | $26.00 | +0.39% | 2.7B | 17.27 | $1.51 | +3.02% |
Stock Comparison
SFL vs KEX Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while KEX trades at $141.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to KEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check KEX's competition here
SFL vs MATX Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while MATX trades at $194.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to MATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check MATX's competition here
SFL vs HAFN Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while HAFN trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HAFN's competition here
SFL vs CMBT Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CMBT trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMBT's competition here
SFL vs BWLP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while BWLP trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check BWLP's competition here
SFL vs ZIM Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while ZIM trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ZIM's competition here
SFL vs SBLK Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SBLK trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SBLK's competition here
SFL vs SB-PC Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SB-PC trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SB-PC's competition here
SFL vs SB-PD Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SB-PD trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SB-PD's competition here
SFL vs TNK Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while TNK trades at $73.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TNK's competition here
SFL vs DAC Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while DAC trades at $131.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to DAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check DAC's competition here
SFL vs NMM Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while NMM trades at $72.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NMM's competition here
SFL vs CDLR Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CDLR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CDLR trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CDLR's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDLR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CDLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CDLR's competition here
SFL vs CMRE Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CMRE trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PC Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
SFL vs ECO Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while ECO trades at $49.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ECO's competition here
SFL vs GOGL Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOGL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while GOGL trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas GOGL's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GOGL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GOGL's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PD Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CMRE-PD trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
SFL vs GSL Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while GSL trades at $38.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GSL's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PB Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CMRE-PB trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
SFL vs CCEC Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CCEC trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CCEC's competition here
SFL vs SBBA Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SBBA's competition here
SFL vs NAT Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while NAT trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NAT's competition here
SFL vs GNK Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while GNK trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 61.21. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GNK's competition here
SFL vs CMRE-PE Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
SFL vs CPLP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CPLP's competition here
SFL vs GSL-PB Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 971.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while GSL-PB trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GSL-PB's competition here
SFL vs HSHP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 687.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while HSHP trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HSHP's competition here
SFL vs SB Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 680.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SB trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SB's competition here
SFL vs ASC Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 671.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while ASC trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ASC's competition here
SFL vs CLCO Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CLCO's competition here
SFL vs PANL Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 478.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while PANL trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PANL's competition here
SFL vs ESEA Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 473.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while ESEA trades at $66.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ESEA's competition here
SFL vs NETI Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NETI's competition here
SFL vs CMDB Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 406.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CMDB trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is -14.84. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CMDB's competition here
SFL vs KNOP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 357.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while KNOP trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 31.26. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check KNOP's competition here
SFL vs GASS Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 349.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while GASS trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GASS's competition here
SFL vs SHIP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 325.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SHIP trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SHIP's competition here
SFL vs OP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 321.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while OP trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check OP's competition here
SFL vs DSX Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 288.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while DSX trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check DSX's competition here
SFL vs SMHI Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SMHI trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SMHI's competition here
SFL vs ESEAV Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ESEAV's competition here
SFL vs DSX-PB Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while DSX-PB trades at $27.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check DSX-PB's competition here
SFL vs TORO Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while TORO trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is 251.50. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TORO's competition here
SFL vs HMR Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while HMR trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HMR's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HMR's competition here
SFL vs EDRY Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while EDRY trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is -198.45. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EDRY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check EDRY's competition here
SFL vs NM Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NM's competition here
SFL vs NM-PH Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NM-PH's competition here
SFL vs GLBS Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while GLBS trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is -27.37. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GLBS's competition here
SFL vs PXSAP Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PXSAP's competition here
SFL vs PXS Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while PXS trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to PXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PXS's competition here
SFL vs EHLDV Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check EHLDV's competition here
SFL vs NM-PG Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NM-PG's competition here
SFL vs TOROV Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TOROV's competition here
SFL vs UFG Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while UFG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UFG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check UFG's competition here
SFL vs USEA Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while USEA trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check USEA's competition here
SFL vs CACO Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CACO's ROE of +21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CACO's competition here
SFL vs HTCO Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while HTCO trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check HTCO's competition here
SFL vs EHLD Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while EHLD trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check EHLD's competition here
SFL vs PSHG Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while PSHG trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PSHG's competition here
SFL vs VNTG Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while VNTG trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VNTG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check VNTG's competition here
SFL vs CTRM Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CTRM trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CTRM's competition here
SFL vs SVRN Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SVRN trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SVRN's competition here
SFL vs TOPS Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while TOPS trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check TOPS's competition here
SFL vs NCT Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while NCT trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check NCT's competition here
SFL vs ICON Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 397.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while ICON trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check ICON's competition here
SFL vs CISS Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 386.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while CISS trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check CISS's competition here
SFL vs PXSAW Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check PXSAW's competition here
SFL vs SHIPW Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SHIPW's competition here
SFL vs RUBI Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while RUBI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check RUBI's competition here
SFL vs GNRT Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GNRT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while GNRT trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas GNRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GNRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to GNRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GNRT's competition here
SFL vs SBLKZ Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SBLKZ's competition here
SFL vs GSLD Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while GSLD trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas GSLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is more volatile compared to GSLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check GSLD's competition here
SFL vs RLOG Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RLOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while RLOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas RLOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RLOG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to RLOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check RLOG's competition here
SFL vs SHIPZ Comparison June 2026
SFL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFL stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFL is priced at $11.24, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFL currently has a P/E ratio of 46.27, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFL's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFL is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFL.Check SHIPZ's competition here