Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNL | $74.13 | +0.72% | 4.6B | 20.65 | $3.59 | +3.12% |
| BKNG | $164.94 | +0.83% | 127.8B | 21.76 | $7.58 | +0.98% |
| RCL | $294.38 | +2.23% | 78.9B | 17.95 | $16.39 | +1.71% |
| ABNB | $132.28 | +1.08% | 78.5B | 32.74 | $4.04 | N/A |
| VIK | $92.25 | -1.00% | 40.9B | 34.27 | $2.69 | N/A |
| TCOM | $46.47 | -1.94% | 29.3B | 6.59 | $7.05 | N/A |
| EXPE | $224.89 | +0.10% | 25.7B | 19.87 | $11.32 | +0.78% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.43 | +1.94% | 8.9B | 15.68 | $1.24 | N/A |
| MMYT | $43.15 | +3.38% | 4.1B | 119.86 | $0.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TNL vs BKNG Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 127.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while BKNG trades at $164.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check BKNG's competition here
TNL vs RCL Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 78.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while RCL trades at $294.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check RCL's competition here
TNL vs ABNB Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while ABNB trades at $132.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check ABNB's competition here
TNL vs VIK Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while VIK trades at $92.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check VIK's competition here
TNL vs TCOM Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while TCOM trades at $46.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TCOM's competition here
TNL vs EXPE Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while EXPE trades at $224.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check EXPE's competition here
TNL vs SABRP Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SABRP's competition here
TNL vs NCLH Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while NCLH trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NCLH's competition here
TNL vs MMYT Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while MMYT trades at $43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 119.86. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MMYT's competition here
TNL vs DESP Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check DESP's competition here
TNL vs LIND Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while LIND trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -43.43. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check LIND's competition here
TNL vs SABR Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 672M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while SABR trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SABR's competition here
TNL vs NUTR Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NUTR's competition here
TNL vs MRNOW Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while MRNOW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MRNOW's competition here
TNL vs YTRA Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while YTRA trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -42.06. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check YTRA's competition here
TNL vs AHMA Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while AHMA trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check AHMA's competition here
TNL vs TOUR Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while TOUR trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TOUR's competition here
TNL vs NTRP Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while NTRP trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NTRP's competition here
TNL vs MKGI Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MKGI's competition here
TNL vs JXG Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while JXG trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check JXG's competition here
TNL vs MOND Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MOND's competition here
TNL vs MONDW Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MONDW's competition here
TNL vs SGLBW Comparison June 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $74.13, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.65, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SGLBW's competition here