TruGolf Holdings, Inc. (TRUG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRUG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUG | $1.57 | -7.10% | 840.8K | -0.16 | -$9.90 | N/A |
| NTES | $125.52 | +3.97% | 80.1B | 16.05 | $7.82 | +2.50% |
| ATVI | $94.42 | -0.05% | 74.3B | 34.59 | $2.73 | +1.05% |
| RBLX | $41.49 | -3.51% | 29.7B | -26.43 | -$1.57 | N/A |
| BILI | $18.09 | +2.73% | 7.6B | 36.16 | $0.50 | N/A |
| PLTK | $3.15 | +2.27% | 1.2B | -4.04 | -$0.78 | +12.92% |
| AVID | $27.05 | +0.02% | 1.2B | 37.56 | $0.72 | N/A |
| MGRT | $86.99 | +10.11% | 1.2B | 505.94 | $0.17 | N/A |
| DDI | $11.48 | +0.00% | 569.9M | 5.00 | $2.30 | N/A |
| SCPL | $22.95 | +0.02% | 495.6M | 23.18 | $0.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRUG vs NTES Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while NTES trades at $125.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to NTES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check NTES's competition here
TRUG vs ATVI Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while ATVI trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check ATVI's competition here
TRUG vs RBLX Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while RBLX trades at $41.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -26.43. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -2.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check RBLX's competition here
TRUG vs BILI Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while BILI trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is 36.16. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to BILI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check BILI's competition here
TRUG vs PLTK Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while PLTK trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to PLTK's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check PLTK's competition here
TRUG vs AVID Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while AVID trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to AVID's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check AVID's competition here
TRUG vs MGRT Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, MGRT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while MGRT trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MGRT's P/E ratio is 505.94. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to MGRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MGRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MGRT's competition here
TRUG vs DDI Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 569.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while DDI trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check DDI's competition here
TRUG vs SCPL Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while SCPL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SCPL's competition here
TRUG vs SOHU Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 410.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while SOHU trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to SOHU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SOHU's competition here
TRUG vs GRVY Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 397.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GRVY trades at $57.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GRVY's competition here
TRUG vs GDEV Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GDEV trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GDEV's competition here
TRUG vs GDEVW Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 236.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GDEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GDEVW's competition here
TRUG vs MRDN Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, MRDN has a market cap of 163.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while MRDN trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MRDN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to MRDN's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to MRDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MRDN's competition here
TRUG vs SKLZ Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 137.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while SKLZ trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SKLZ's competition here
TRUG vs MYPS Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while MYPS trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MYPS's competition here
TRUG vs GCL Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GCL trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is 44.40. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GCL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GCL's competition here
TRUG vs GMHS Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GMHS trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GMHS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GMHS's competition here
TRUG vs MYPSW Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 50.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while MYPSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MYPSW's competition here
TRUG vs BRAG Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while BRAG trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check BRAG's competition here
TRUG vs GCLWW Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GCLWW has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GCLWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GCLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GCLWW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GCLWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GCLWW's competition here
TRUG vs GAME Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GAME trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GAME's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GAME's competition here
TRUG vs SNAL Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while SNAL trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to SNAL's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SNAL's competition here
TRUG vs MSGM Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while MSGM trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to MSGM's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MSGM's competition here
TRUG vs NCTY Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while NCTY trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check NCTY's competition here
TRUG vs GIGM Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GIGM trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GIGM's competition here
TRUG vs GXAI Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GXAI trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GXAI's competition here
TRUG vs GMGI Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GMGI trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GMGI's competition here
TRUG vs GDC Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GDC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GDC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check GDC's competition here
TRUG vs TBH Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while TBH trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to TBH's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check TBH's competition here
TRUG vs NFTG Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while NFTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to NFTG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check NFTG's competition here
TRUG vs BHAT Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 97.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while BHAT trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check BHAT's competition here
TRUG vs MGAM Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 80.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while MGAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -18.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check MGAM's competition here
TRUG vs GGL Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while GGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRUG has daily volatility of 9.40 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.Check GGL's competition here
TRUG vs YVR Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, YVR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while YVR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check YVR's competition here
TRUG vs SCR Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, SCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while SCR trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check SCR's competition here
TRUG vs HPY Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, HPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while HPY trades at $103.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas HPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to HPY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to HPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check HPY's competition here
TRUG vs CCNC Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, CCNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while CCNC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is less volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check CCNC's competition here
TRUG vs ZNGA Comparison June 2026
TRUG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRUG stands at 840.8K. In comparison, ZNGA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRUG is priced at $1.57, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRUG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, TRUG's ROE is -3.22%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRUG is more volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRUG.Check ZNGA's competition here