Trane Technologies plc (TT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | $469.65 | +2.34% | 104B | 35.87 | $13.11 | +0.85% |
| LII | $528.34 | +2.90% | 18.4B | 23.53 | $22.49 | +0.99% |
| CSL | $346.02 | +2.34% | 14.1B | 20.30 | $17.13 | +1.27% |
| AAON | $127.71 | -3.29% | 10.6B | 91.31 | $1.42 | +0.31% |
| WMS | $135.77 | +4.03% | 10.4B | 24.87 | $5.46 | +0.55% |
| OC | $120.28 | +0.96% | 9.9B | -25.94 | -$4.74 | +2.42% |
| BLDR | $78.61 | +7.51% | 8.3B | 29.59 | $2.62 | N/A |
| SSD | $192.32 | +3.51% | 7.9B | 22.65 | $8.53 | +0.60% |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
| AZEK | $54.35 | -0.93% | 7.8B | 52.77 | $1.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TT vs LII Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while LII trades at $528.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TT and LII have similar daily volatility (1.15).Check LII's competition here
TT vs CSL Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while CSL trades at $346.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CSL's competition here
TT vs AAON Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while AAON trades at $127.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 91.31. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AAON's competition here
TT vs WMS Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while WMS trades at $135.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check WMS's competition here
TT vs OC Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while OC trades at $120.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -25.94. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check OC's competition here
TT vs BLDR Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while BLDR trades at $78.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BLDR's competition here
TT vs SSD Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while SSD trades at $192.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SSD's competition here
TT vs FBHS Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FBHS's competition here
TT vs AZEK Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AZEK's competition here
TT vs BECN Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BECN's competition here
TT vs AWI Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while AWI trades at $156.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AWI's competition here
TT vs FBIN Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while FBIN trades at $41.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FBIN's competition here
TT vs TREX Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while TREX trades at $44.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check TREX's competition here
TT vs GMS Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check GMS's competition here
TT vs DOOR Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check DOOR's competition here
TT vs PGTI Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PGTI's competition here
TT vs ROCK Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while ROCK trades at $38.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ROCK's competition here
TT vs APOG Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 842.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while APOG trades at $39.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check APOG's competition here
TT vs NX Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 763.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while NX trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check NX's competition here
TT vs JBI Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 719.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while JBI trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check JBI's competition here
TT vs SWIM Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 657.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while SWIM trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SWIM's competition here
TT vs ASPN Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 457.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while ASPN trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ASPN's competition here
TT vs BXC Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 418.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while BXC trades at $53.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is -109.80. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BXC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check BXC's competition here
TT vs PHOE Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 329.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while PHOE trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 508.33. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PHOE's competition here
TT vs PPIH Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 205.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while PPIH trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check PPIH's competition here
TT vs JELD Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while JELD trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check JELD's competition here
TT vs SMJF Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 78.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while SMJF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 176.67. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check SMJF's competition here
TT vs CSTE Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while CSTE trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check CSTE's competition here
TT vs APT Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 55.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while APT trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check APT's competition here
TT vs ILAG Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while ILAG trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check ILAG's competition here
TT vs VIEW Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check VIEW's competition here
TT vs AEHL Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 581.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while AEHL trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AEHL's competition here
TT vs VIEWW Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check VIEWW's competition here
TT vs LAYN Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while LAYN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check LAYN's competition here
TT vs HW Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while HW trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas HW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to HW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check HW's competition here
TT vs AFI Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check AFI's competition here
TT vs FRTA Comparison June 2026
TT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TT stands at 104B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TT is priced at $469.65, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.87, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, TT's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TT is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TT.Check FRTA's competition here