Watches of Switzerland Group plc (WOSGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WOSGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOSGF | $9.58 | +2.68% | 2.2B | 23.95 | $0.40 | N/A |
| LVMUY | $112.25 | -1.50% | 278.2B | 22.29 | $5.03 | +2.66% |
| LVMHF | $561.01 | -1.10% | 278.2B | 22.35 | $25.17 | +2.70% |
| HESAY | $188.70 | -2.12% | 197.8B | 38.12 | $4.95 | +1.09% |
| HESAF | $1,870.87 | -3.43% | 196.1B | 37.36 | $50.08 | +2.45% |
| CFRUY | $20.90 | -0.85% | 122.8B | 30.72 | $0.68 | +1.79% |
| CFRHF | $212.09 | -1.35% | 113.3B | 31.05 | $6.83 | +1.79% |
| CHDRF | $532.38 | +0.00% | 96B | 18.42 | $28.91 | +3.14% |
| CHDRY | $128.56 | +0.00% | 92.8B | 17.76 | $7.24 | +3.25% |
| PPRUY | $29.23 | -1.42% | 35.9B | -975.53 | -$0.03 | +1.09% |
Stock Comparison
WOSGF vs LVMUY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 278.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while LVMUY trades at $112.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check LVMUY's competition here
WOSGF vs LVMHF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LVMHF has a market cap of 278.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while LVMHF trades at $561.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas LVMHF's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LVMHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to LVMHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check LVMHF's competition here
WOSGF vs HESAY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 197.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while HESAY trades at $188.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 38.12. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check HESAY's competition here
WOSGF vs HESAF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 196.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while HESAF trades at $1,870.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check HESAF's competition here
WOSGF vs CFRUY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while CFRUY trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check CFRUY's competition here
WOSGF vs CFRHF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while CFRHF trades at $212.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check CFRHF's competition here
WOSGF vs CHDRF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while CHDRF trades at $532.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check CHDRF's competition here
WOSGF vs CHDRY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while CHDRY trades at $128.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check CHDRY's competition here
WOSGF vs PPRUY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while PPRUY trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is -975.53. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check PPRUY's competition here
WOSGF vs PPRUF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while PPRUF trades at $291.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is -1077.93. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check PPRUF's competition here
WOSGF vs CJEWF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while CJEWF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check CJEWF's competition here
WOSGF vs CJEWY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while CJEWY trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check CJEWY's competition here
WOSGF vs SWGAF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while SWGAF trades at $263.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 5277.00. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check SWGAF's competition here
WOSGF vs PRDSF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while PRDSF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check PRDSF's competition here
WOSGF vs PRDSY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while PRDSY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check PRDSY's competition here
WOSGF vs SWGAY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while SWGAY trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 175.86. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check SWGAY's competition here
WOSGF vs SWGNF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SWGNF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while SWGNF trades at $47.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas SWGNF's P/E ratio is 4785.00. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWGNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to SWGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check SWGNF's competition here
WOSGF vs BCUCY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while BCUCY trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 43.48. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check BCUCY's competition here
WOSGF vs BCUCF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BCUCF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while BCUCF trades at $95.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas BCUCF's P/E ratio is 42.11. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCUCF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to BCUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check BCUCF's competition here
WOSGF vs BBRYF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while BBRYF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check BBRYF's competition here
WOSGF vs PNDZF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while PNDZF trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check PNDZF's competition here
WOSGF vs BURBY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while BURBY trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is 187.16. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BURBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check BURBY's competition here
WOSGF vs PANDY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while PANDY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check PANDY's competition here
WOSGF vs SFRGY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while SFRGY trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -11.39. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check SFRGY's competition here
WOSGF vs LKFLF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while LKFLF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check LKFLF's competition here
WOSGF vs SFRGF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while SFRGF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check SFRGF's competition here
WOSGF vs CHOWF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while CHOWF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check CHOWF's competition here
WOSGF vs EPRJF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while EPRJF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check EPRJF's competition here
WOSGF vs DCOHF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 289.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while DCOHF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check DCOHF's competition here
WOSGF vs TSSJF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while TSSJF trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check TSSJF's competition here
WOSGF vs ZAPNF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check ZAPNF's competition here
WOSGF vs ORWHF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while ORWHF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check ORWHF's competition here
WOSGF vs HENGY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while HENGY trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -44.50. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check HENGY's competition here
WOSGF vs FLLIY Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while FLLIY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check FLLIY's competition here
WOSGF vs HENGF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while HENGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check HENGF's competition here
WOSGF vs CTTLF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check CTTLF's competition here
WOSGF vs CEBTF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while CEBTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check CEBTF's competition here
WOSGF vs MENEF Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while MENEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MENEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check MENEF's competition here
WOSGF vs MDNL Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while MDNL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check MDNL's competition here
WOSGF vs MAJJ Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check MAJJ's competition here
WOSGF vs BANI Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while BANI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BANI's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check BANI's competition here
WOSGF vs EATR Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while EATR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EATR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to EATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check EATR's competition here
WOSGF vs BRGO Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while BRGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check BRGO's competition here
WOSGF vs MASN Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 136.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while MASN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MASN's ROE of +11.81%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is more volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check MASN's competition here
WOSGF vs SSOK Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 110.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while SSOK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check SSOK's competition here
WOSGF vs BRGOD Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check BRGOD's competition here
WOSGF vs AVEW Comparison June 2026
WOSGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOSGF stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, WOSGF is priced at $9.58, while AVEW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOSGF currently has a P/E ratio of 23.95, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOSGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WOSGF is less volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOSGF.Check AVEW's competition here