Agricultural Bank of China Limited (ACGBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ACGBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACGBF | $0.74 | -3.90% | 259B | 6.17 | $0.12 | +7.23% |
| BACRP | $185.77 | +0.00% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +2.06% |
| CICHY | $22.21 | -0.49% | 386.8B | 5.70 | $3.89 | +4.92% |
| IDCBY | $17.85 | +1.19% | 314.7B | 5.93 | $2.98 | +5.07% |
| IDCBF | $0.89 | +0.57% | 313.6B | 5.87 | $0.15 | +5.09% |
| HBCYF | $17.64 | -0.42% | 303.1B | 14.58 | $1.21 | +4.08% |
| CICHF | $1.02 | -9.29% | 263B | 5.76 | $0.19 | +4.99% |
| ACGBY | $18.46 | -0.27% | 255B | 6.24 | $2.92 | +7.30% |
| MBFJF | $19.23 | -5.27% | 223.3B | 14.87 | $1.33 | +2.75% |
| BACHY | $17.26 | +1.50% | 214.5B | 6.17 | $2.78 | +4.69% |
Stock Comparison
ACGBF vs BACRP Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BACRP trades at $185.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACRP's competition here
ACGBF vs CICHY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 386.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while CICHY trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check CICHY's competition here
ACGBF vs IDCBY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 314.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while IDCBY trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check IDCBY's competition here
ACGBF vs IDCBF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 313.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while IDCBF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and IDCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDCBF's competition here
ACGBF vs HBCYF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 303.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while HBCYF trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check HBCYF's competition here
ACGBF vs CICHF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 263B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while CICHF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and CICHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CICHF's competition here
ACGBF vs ACGBY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 255B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while ACGBY trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.24. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check ACGBY's competition here
ACGBF vs MBFJF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 223.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while MBFJF trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check MBFJF's competition here
ACGBF vs BACHY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 214.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BACHY trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check BACHY's competition here
ACGBF vs BACHF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 209.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BACHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check BACHF's competition here
ACGBF vs CBAUF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 207.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while CBAUF trades at $124.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and CBAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBAUF's competition here
ACGBF vs CMWAY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while CMWAY trades at $112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check CMWAY's competition here
ACGBF vs BCDRF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 185.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BCDRF trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check BCDRF's competition here
ACGBF vs SMFNF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while SMFNF trades at $38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and SMFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMFNF's competition here
ACGBF vs BBVXF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BBVXF trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check BBVXF's competition here
ACGBF vs INGVF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while INGVF trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and INGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INGVF's competition here
ACGBF vs WEBNF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while WEBNF trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and WEBNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEBNF's competition here
ACGBF vs BCLYF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BCLYF trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check BCLYF's competition here
ACGBF vs BKFCF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BKFCF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and BKFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFCF's competition here
ACGBF vs NABZY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while NABZY trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check NABZY's competition here
ACGBF vs BCMXY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BCMXY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check BCMXY's competition here
ACGBF vs ANZGY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while ANZGY trades at $24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check ANZGY's competition here
ACGBF vs NAUBF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while NAUBF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and NAUBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NAUBF's competition here
ACGBF vs RBSPF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while RBSPF trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check RBSPF's competition here
ACGBF vs NTIOF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while NTIOF trades at $148.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check NTIOF's competition here
ACGBF vs SCBFY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while SCBFY trades at $48.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check SCBFY's competition here
ACGBF vs ANEWF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANEWF's competition here
ACGBF vs SCBFF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while SCBFF trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check SCBFF's competition here
ACGBF vs ABMRF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while ABMRF trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABMRF's competition here
ACGBF vs AAVMY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while AAVMY trades at $38.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check AAVMY's competition here
ACGBF vs FANDY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while FANDY trades at $56.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and FANDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDY's competition here
ACGBF vs FANDF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while FANDF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and FANDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDF's competition here
ACGBF vs TDBKF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check TDBKF's competition here
ACGBF vs SVNLF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while SVNLF trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and SVNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVNLF's competition here
ACGBF vs SVNLY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while SVNLY trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check SVNLY's competition here
ACGBF vs RBCPF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check RBCPF's competition here
ACGBF vs BNSPF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNSPF's competition here
ACGBF vs BNDSY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BNDSY trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check BNDSY's competition here
ACGBF vs BNDSF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BNDSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and BNDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNDSF's competition here
ACGBF vs ITCFY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, ITCFY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while ITCFY trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas ITCFY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITCFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and ITCFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITCFY's competition here
ACGBF vs ALORY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALORY's competition here
ACGBF vs NBKCF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while NBKCF trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and NBKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBKCF's competition here
ACGBF vs IVTJF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while IVTJF trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and IVTJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVTJF's competition here
ACGBF vs IVTJY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while IVTJY trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and IVTJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVTJY's competition here
ACGBF vs CSGKF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and CSGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSGKF's competition here
ACGBF vs WFCNP Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while WFCNP trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and WFCNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WFCNP's competition here
ACGBF vs BCSO Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and BCSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCSO's competition here
ACGBF vs TNTTF Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACGBF.Check TNTTF's competition here
ACGBF vs ANZBY Comparison June 2026
ACGBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACGBF stands at 259B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACGBF is priced at $0.74, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACGBF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.17, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACGBF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACGBF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZBY's competition here