Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBAUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CBAUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBAUF | $124.08 | N/A | 207.5B | 28.33 | $4.38 | +2.68% |
| BACRP | $185.77 | N/A | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +2.06% |
| CICHY | $22.30 | +0.54% | 388.9B | 5.73 | $3.89 | +4.92% |
| IDCBY | $17.85 | +1.13% | 318.1B | 5.99 | $2.98 | +5.07% |
| IDCBF | $0.89 | +0.70% | 317.2B | 5.93 | $0.15 | +5.09% |
| HBCYF | $18.10 | +2.60% | 311B | 14.96 | $1.21 | +4.08% |
| ACGBF | $0.77 | N/A | 269.5B | 6.42 | $0.12 | +7.23% |
| CICHF | $1.12 | +2.38% | 269.3B | 5.89 | $0.19 | +4.99% |
| ACGBY | $18.44 | +1.26% | 258.1B | 6.32 | $2.92 | +7.30% |
| BACHF | $0.69 | -1.43% | 222.3B | 6.27 | $0.11 | +7.49% |
Stock Comparison
CBAUF vs BACRP Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BACRP trades at $185.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACRP's competition here
CBAUF vs CICHY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 388.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while CICHY trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check CICHY's competition here
CBAUF vs IDCBY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 318.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while IDCBY trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check IDCBY's competition here
CBAUF vs IDCBF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 317.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while IDCBF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check IDCBF's competition here
CBAUF vs HBCYF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 311B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while HBCYF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check HBCYF's competition here
CBAUF vs ACGBF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 269.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while ACGBF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check ACGBF's competition here
CBAUF vs CICHF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 269.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while CICHF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check CICHF's competition here
CBAUF vs ACGBY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 258.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while ACGBY trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check ACGBY's competition here
CBAUF vs BACHF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 222.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BACHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BACHF's competition here
CBAUF vs MBFJF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 220.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while MBFJF trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check MBFJF's competition here
CBAUF vs BACHY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 215.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BACHY trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BACHY's competition here
CBAUF vs CMWAY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 186.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while CMWAY trades at $111.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check CMWAY's competition here
CBAUF vs BCDRF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 182.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BCDRF trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BCDRF's competition here
CBAUF vs SMFNF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 144.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while SMFNF trades at $37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check SMFNF's competition here
CBAUF vs BBVXF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BBVXF trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BBVXF's competition here
CBAUF vs BCLYF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BCLYF trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BCLYF's competition here
CBAUF vs INGVF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while INGVF trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and INGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INGVF's competition here
CBAUF vs WEBNF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while WEBNF trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and WEBNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEBNF's competition here
CBAUF vs BKFCF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BKFCF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BKFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFCF's competition here
CBAUF vs NABZY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while NABZY trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check NABZY's competition here
CBAUF vs BCMXY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BCMXY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BCMXY's competition here
CBAUF vs ANZGY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while ANZGY trades at $24.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check ANZGY's competition here
CBAUF vs NAUBF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while NAUBF trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check NAUBF's competition here
CBAUF vs RBSPF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while RBSPF trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check RBSPF's competition here
CBAUF vs NTIOF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while NTIOF trades at $148.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check NTIOF's competition here
CBAUF vs ANEWF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANEWF's competition here
CBAUF vs SCBFF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while SCBFF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check SCBFF's competition here
CBAUF vs SCBFY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while SCBFY trades at $47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check SCBFY's competition here
CBAUF vs ABMRF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while ABMRF trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABMRF's competition here
CBAUF vs FANDY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while FANDY trades at $56.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check FANDY's competition here
CBAUF vs AAVMY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while AAVMY trades at $38.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check AAVMY's competition here
CBAUF vs FANDF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while FANDF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and FANDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDF's competition here
CBAUF vs TDBKF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check TDBKF's competition here
CBAUF vs SVNLY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while SVNLY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check SVNLY's competition here
CBAUF vs SVNLF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while SVNLF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and SVNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVNLF's competition here
CBAUF vs RBCPF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check RBCPF's competition here
CBAUF vs BNSPF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNSPF's competition here
CBAUF vs BNDSF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BNDSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BNDSF's competition here
CBAUF vs BNDSY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BNDSY trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BNDSY's competition here
CBAUF vs WFCNP Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while WFCNP trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check WFCNP's competition here
CBAUF vs ITCFY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, ITCFY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while ITCFY trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ITCFY's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITCFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ITCFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITCFY's competition here
CBAUF vs ALORY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALORY's competition here
CBAUF vs NBKCF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while NBKCF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check NBKCF's competition here
CBAUF vs IVTJF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while IVTJF trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check IVTJF's competition here
CBAUF vs IVTJY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while IVTJY trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check IVTJY's competition here
CBAUF vs CSGKF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and CSGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSGKF's competition here
CBAUF vs BCSO Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check BCSO's competition here
CBAUF vs ANZBY Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZBY's competition here
CBAUF vs TNTTF Comparison June 2026
CBAUF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CBAUF stands at 207.5B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CBAUF is priced at $124.08, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CBAUF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, CBAUF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CBAUF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CBAUF.Check TNTTF's competition here