Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. (APRN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (APRN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APRN | $12.99 | -0.08% | 100M | -0.70 | -$18.54 | N/A |
| AMZN | $238.00 | -2.53% | 2.6T | 30.70 | $7.75 | N/A |
| BABA | $115.38 | -3.61% | 269.4B | 30.62 | $3.77 | +1.67% |
| PDD | $81.82 | -0.13% | 114.9B | 8.58 | $9.54 | N/A |
| MELI | $1,588.29 | -3.22% | 80.5B | 41.93 | $37.88 | N/A |
| ORLY | $90.46 | +1.08% | 75B | 29.47 | $3.07 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,110.05 | -0.88% | 50.9B | 21.40 | $145.40 | N/A |
| SE | $82.44 | -2.86% | 50.5B | 32.44 | $2.54 | N/A |
| EBAY | $106.41 | -2.07% | 47.2B | 24.58 | $4.33 | +1.11% |
| JD | $28.45 | -0.97% | 38.4B | 20.62 | $1.38 | +3.47% |
Stock Comparison
APRN vs AMZN Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while AMZN trades at $238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check AMZN's competition here
APRN vs BABA Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 269.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BABA trades at $115.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BABA's competition here
APRN vs PDD Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while PDD trades at $81.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check PDD's competition here
APRN vs MELI Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while MELI trades at $1,588.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check MELI's competition here
APRN vs ORLY Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while ORLY trades at $90.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check ORLY's competition here
APRN vs AZO Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while AZO trades at $3,110.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check AZO's competition here
APRN vs SE Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while SE trades at $82.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check SE's competition here
APRN vs EBAY Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while EBAY trades at $106.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check EBAY's competition here
APRN vs JD Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while JD trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check JD's competition here
APRN vs CASY Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while CASY trades at $915.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 47.74. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check CASY's competition here
APRN vs CPNG Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while CPNG trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -151.25. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check CPNG's competition here
APRN vs WSM Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while WSM trades at $206.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check WSM's competition here
APRN vs ULTA Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while ULTA trades at $470.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check ULTA's competition here
APRN vs DKS Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while DKS trades at $214.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check DKS's competition here
APRN vs TSCO Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while TSCO trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check TSCO's competition here
APRN vs BBY Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BBY trades at $75.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BBY's competition here
APRN vs GPC Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while GPC trades at $98.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 223.73. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check GPC's competition here
APRN vs MUSA Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while MUSA trades at $612.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check MUSA's competition here
APRN vs GME Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while GME trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check GME's competition here
APRN vs CART Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while CART trades at $41.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check CART's competition here
APRN vs W Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while W trades at $68.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas W's P/E ratio is -29.26. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check W's competition here
APRN vs CHWY Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while CHWY trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 38.40. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check CHWY's competition here
APRN vs VIPS Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while VIPS trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check VIPS's competition here
APRN vs ETSY Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while ETSY trades at $68.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check ETSY's competition here
APRN vs GLBE Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while GLBE trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 48.85. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check GLBE's competition here
APRN vs MNSO Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while MNSO trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check MNSO's competition here
APRN vs BBWI Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BBWI trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BBWI's competition here
APRN vs AAP Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while AAP trades at $59.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 52.98. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check AAP's competition here
APRN vs ASO Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while ASO trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check ASO's competition here
APRN vs RH Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while RH trades at $148.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to RH's ROE of -5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check RH's competition here
APRN vs OZON Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check OZON's competition here
APRN vs BOBS Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BOBS trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BOBS's competition here
APRN vs SVV Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while SVV trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 68.07. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check SVV's competition here
APRN vs RVLV Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while RVLV trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check RVLV's competition here
APRN vs RERE Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while RERE trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check RERE's competition here
APRN vs EYE Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while EYE trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check EYE's competition here
APRN vs OLPX Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while OLPX trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check OLPX's competition here
APRN vs TA Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check TA's competition here
APRN vs SBH Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while SBH trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check SBH's competition here
APRN vs LQDT Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while LQDT trades at $37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check LQDT's competition here
APRN vs TANNI Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check TANNI's competition here
APRN vs ARKO Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 904.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while ARKO trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 40.30. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check ARKO's competition here
APRN vs HEPS Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 894.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while HEPS trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check HEPS's competition here
APRN vs ODP Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while ODP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check ODP's competition here
APRN vs WOOF Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 808.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while WOOF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 141.50. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check WOOF's competition here
APRN vs OSTK Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check OSTK's competition here
APRN vs HZO Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 718.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while HZO trades at $32.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check HZO's competition here
APRN vs EVGOW Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 690.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while EVGOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check EVGOW's competition here
APRN vs BWMX Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 685.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BWMX trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BWMX's competition here
APRN vs TDUP Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 623.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while TDUP trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -26.83. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check TDUP's competition here
APRN vs EVGO Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 593.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while EVGO trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to EVGO's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check EVGO's competition here
APRN vs BYON Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BYON trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BYON's competition here
APRN vs DADA Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check DADA's competition here
APRN vs ZKH Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 467.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while ZKH trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -57.70. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check ZKH's competition here
APRN vs JMIA Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 428.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while JMIA trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check JMIA's competition here
APRN vs BBW Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BBW trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BBW's competition here
APRN vs BBBY Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BBBY trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BBBY's competition here
APRN vs HNST Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 380.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while HNST trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -20.35. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check HNST's competition here
APRN vs LE Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, LE has a market cap of 380.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while LE trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LE's P/E ratio is 68.61. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to LE's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to LE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check LE's competition here
APRN vs BNED Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BNED trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -37.41. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BNED's competition here
APRN vs NEGG Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 351.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while NEGG trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is 64.54. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check NEGG's competition here
APRN vs YSG Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while YSG trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check YSG's competition here
APRN vs FLWS Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while FLWS trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check FLWS's competition here
APRN vs LOGC Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while LOGC trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check LOGC's competition here
APRN vs FTCH Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check FTCH's competition here
APRN vs QRTEA Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check QRTEA's competition here
APRN vs CHPT Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while CHPT trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check CHPT's competition here
APRN vs BZUN Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 150.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BZUN trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BZUN's competition here
APRN vs VLTA Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check VLTA's competition here
APRN vs DIBS Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while DIBS trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check DIBS's competition here
APRN vs JMG Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while JMG trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check JMG's competition here
APRN vs QRTEP Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check QRTEP's competition here
APRN vs GOED Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check GOED's competition here
APRN vs AKA Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while AKA trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check AKA's competition here
APRN vs GRWG Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while GRWG trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check GRWG's competition here
APRN vs BARK Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 87.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BARK trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BARK's competition here
APRN vs HOUR Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while HOUR trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check HOUR's competition here
APRN vs NXB Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, NXB has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while NXB trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NXB's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to NXB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to NXB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check NXB's competition here
APRN vs NPT Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while NPT trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -58.75. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check NPT's competition here
APRN vs QRTEB Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check QRTEB's competition here
APRN vs CTIB Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check CTIB's competition here
APRN vs SPWH Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while SPWH trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check SPWH's competition here
APRN vs PRTS Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while PRTS trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check PRTS's competition here
APRN vs KIRK Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check KIRK's competition here
APRN vs SSU Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check SSU's competition here
APRN vs BGFV Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BGFV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BGFV's competition here
APRN vs LITB Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while LITB trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check LITB's competition here
APRN vs DTC Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check DTC's competition here
APRN vs NHTC Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while NHTC trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -20.91. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check NHTC's competition here
APRN vs TBHC Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while TBHC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check TBHC's competition here
APRN vs QVCGP Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check QVCGP's competition here
APRN vs TLF Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while TLF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check TLF's competition here
APRN vs MOGU Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while MOGU trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check MOGU's competition here
APRN vs BOXD Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check BOXD's competition here
APRN vs JBDI Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while JBDI trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check JBDI's competition here
APRN vs CGTL Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while CGTL trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check CGTL's competition here
APRN vs SBDS Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, SBDS has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while SBDS trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas SBDS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to SBDS's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to SBDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check SBDS's competition here
APRN vs TCS Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while TCS trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check TCS's competition here
APRN vs YJ Comparison June 2026
APRN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APRN stands at 100M. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APRN is priced at $12.99, while YJ trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APRN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.70, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, APRN's ROE is -1.93%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APRN is less volatile compared to YJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APRN.Check YJ's competition here