Lands' End, Inc. (LE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LE | $12.35 | +1.56% | 380.7M | 68.61 | $0.18 | N/A |
| AMZN | $238.00 | -2.53% | 2.6T | 30.70 | $7.75 | N/A |
| BABA | $115.38 | -3.61% | 269.4B | 30.62 | $3.77 | +1.67% |
| PDD | $81.82 | -0.13% | 114.9B | 8.58 | $9.54 | N/A |
| MELI | $1,588.29 | -3.22% | 80.5B | 41.93 | $37.88 | N/A |
| ORLY | $90.46 | +1.08% | 75B | 29.47 | $3.07 | N/A |
| AZO | $3,110.05 | -0.88% | 50.9B | 21.40 | $145.40 | N/A |
| SE | $82.44 | -2.86% | 50.5B | 32.44 | $2.54 | N/A |
| EBAY | $106.41 | -2.07% | 47.2B | 24.58 | $4.33 | +1.11% |
| JD | $28.45 | -0.97% | 38.4B | 20.62 | $1.38 | +3.47% |
Stock Comparison
LE vs AMZN Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while AMZN trades at $238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check AMZN's competition here
LE vs BABA Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 269.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BABA trades at $115.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BABA's competition here
LE vs PDD Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while PDD trades at $81.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check PDD's competition here
LE vs MELI Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while MELI trades at $1,588.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check MELI's competition here
LE vs ORLY Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while ORLY trades at $90.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check ORLY's competition here
LE vs AZO Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while AZO trades at $3,110.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check AZO's competition here
LE vs SE Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while SE trades at $82.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check SE's competition here
LE vs EBAY Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while EBAY trades at $106.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check EBAY's competition here
LE vs JD Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while JD trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check JD's competition here
LE vs CASY Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while CASY trades at $915.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 47.74. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to CASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check CASY's competition here
LE vs CPNG Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while CPNG trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -151.25. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check CPNG's competition here
LE vs WSM Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while WSM trades at $206.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check WSM's competition here
LE vs ULTA Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while ULTA trades at $470.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check ULTA's competition here
LE vs DKS Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while DKS trades at $214.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to DKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check DKS's competition here
LE vs TSCO Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while TSCO trades at $30.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check TSCO's competition here
LE vs BBY Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BBY trades at $75.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BBY's competition here
LE vs GPC Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, GPC has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while GPC trades at $98.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas GPC's P/E ratio is 223.73. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to GPC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to GPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check GPC's competition here
LE vs MUSA Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while MUSA trades at $612.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check MUSA's competition here
LE vs GME Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while GME trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to GME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check GME's competition here
LE vs CART Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, CART has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while CART trades at $41.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas CART's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CART's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to CART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check CART's competition here
LE vs W Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while W trades at $68.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas W's P/E ratio is -29.26. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to W. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check W's competition here
LE vs CHWY Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while CHWY trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 38.40. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check CHWY's competition here
LE vs VIPS Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while VIPS trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check VIPS's competition here
LE vs ETSY Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while ETSY trades at $68.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check ETSY's competition here
LE vs GLBE Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while GLBE trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 48.85. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check GLBE's competition here
LE vs MNSO Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while MNSO trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check MNSO's competition here
LE vs BBWI Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BBWI trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BBWI's competition here
LE vs AAP Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while AAP trades at $59.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 52.98. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check AAP's competition here
LE vs ASO Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while ASO trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to ASO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check ASO's competition here
LE vs RH Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while RH trades at $148.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to RH's ROE of -5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to RH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check RH's competition here
LE vs OZON Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while OZON trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check OZON's competition here
LE vs BOBS Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BOBS trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BOBS's competition here
LE vs SVV Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while SVV trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 68.07. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check SVV's competition here
LE vs RVLV Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while RVLV trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check RVLV's competition here
LE vs RERE Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while RERE trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to RERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check RERE's competition here
LE vs EYE Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while EYE trades at $17.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check EYE's competition here
LE vs OLPX Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while OLPX trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check OLPX's competition here
LE vs TA Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while TA trades at $86.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check TA's competition here
LE vs SBH Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while SBH trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check SBH's competition here
LE vs LQDT Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while LQDT trades at $37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 40.67. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check LQDT's competition here
LE vs TANNI Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while TANNI trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check TANNI's competition here
LE vs ARKO Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 904.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while ARKO trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 40.30. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check ARKO's competition here
LE vs HEPS Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 894.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while HEPS trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check HEPS's competition here
LE vs ODP Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while ODP trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check ODP's competition here
LE vs WOOF Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 808.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while WOOF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 141.50. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check WOOF's competition here
LE vs OSTK Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while OSTK trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check OSTK's competition here
LE vs HZO Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 718.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while HZO trades at $32.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to HZO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check HZO's competition here
LE vs EVGOW Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, EVGOW has a market cap of 690.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while EVGOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas EVGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to EVGOW's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to EVGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check EVGOW's competition here
LE vs BWMX Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 685.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BWMX trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BWMX's competition here
LE vs TDUP Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 623.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while TDUP trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -26.83. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check TDUP's competition here
LE vs EVGO Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 593.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while EVGO trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to EVGO's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check EVGO's competition here
LE vs BYON Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BYON trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BYON's competition here
LE vs DADA Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while DADA trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check DADA's competition here
LE vs ZKH Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 467.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while ZKH trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -57.70. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check ZKH's competition here
LE vs JMIA Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 428.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while JMIA trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check JMIA's competition here
LE vs BBW Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BBW trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to BBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BBW's competition here
LE vs BBBY Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BBBY trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BBBY's competition here
LE vs HNST Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, HNST has a market cap of 380.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while HNST trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas HNST's P/E ratio is -20.35. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to HNST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to HNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check HNST's competition here
LE vs BNED Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 372.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BNED trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -37.41. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BNED's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to BNED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BNED's competition here
LE vs NEGG Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 351.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while NEGG trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is 64.54. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to NEGG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check NEGG's competition here
LE vs YSG Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, YSG has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while YSG trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas YSG's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to YSG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to YSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check YSG's competition here
LE vs FLWS Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while FLWS trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check FLWS's competition here
LE vs LOGC Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, LOGC has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while LOGC trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas LOGC's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to LOGC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to LOGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check LOGC's competition here
LE vs FTCH Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while FTCH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check FTCH's competition here
LE vs QRTEA Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check QRTEA's competition here
LE vs CHPT Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while CHPT trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -6.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check CHPT's competition here
LE vs BZUN Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BZUN has a market cap of 150.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BZUN trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BZUN's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BZUN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to BZUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BZUN's competition here
LE vs VLTA Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while VLTA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check VLTA's competition here
LE vs DIBS Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while DIBS trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check DIBS's competition here
LE vs JMG Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while JMG trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to JMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check JMG's competition here
LE vs QRTEP Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check QRTEP's competition here
LE vs GOED Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while GOED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to GOED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check GOED's competition here
LE vs AKA Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while AKA trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check AKA's competition here
LE vs APRN Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while APRN trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check APRN's competition here
LE vs GRWG Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while GRWG trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check GRWG's competition here
LE vs BARK Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 87.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BARK trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BARK's competition here
LE vs HOUR Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while HOUR trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check HOUR's competition here
LE vs NXB Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, NXB has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while NXB trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas NXB's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to NXB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to NXB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check NXB's competition here
LE vs NPT Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, NPT has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while NPT trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas NPT's P/E ratio is -58.75. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to NPT's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to NPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check NPT's competition here
LE vs QRTEB Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check QRTEB's competition here
LE vs CTIB Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while CTIB trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check CTIB's competition here
LE vs SPWH Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while SPWH trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check SPWH's competition here
LE vs PRTS Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while PRTS trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check PRTS's competition here
LE vs KIRK Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while KIRK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check KIRK's competition here
LE vs SSU Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while SSU trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check SSU's competition here
LE vs BGFV Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BGFV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BGFV's competition here
LE vs LITB Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while LITB trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to LITB's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to LITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check LITB's competition here
LE vs DTC Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while DTC trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check DTC's competition here
LE vs NHTC Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, NHTC has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while NHTC trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas NHTC's P/E ratio is -20.91. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to NHTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to NHTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check NHTC's competition here
LE vs TBHC Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while TBHC trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check TBHC's competition here
LE vs QVCGP Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check QVCGP's competition here
LE vs TLF Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while TLF trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to TLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check TLF's competition here
LE vs MOGU Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while MOGU trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to MOGU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check MOGU's competition here
LE vs BOXD Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while BOXD trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check BOXD's competition here
LE vs JBDI Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, JBDI has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while JBDI trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas JBDI's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to JBDI's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to JBDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check JBDI's competition here
LE vs CGTL Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, CGTL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while CGTL trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas CGTL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CGTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to CGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check CGTL's competition here
LE vs SBDS Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, SBDS has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while SBDS trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas SBDS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SBDS's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to SBDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check SBDS's competition here
LE vs TCS Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, TCS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while TCS trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas TCS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to TCS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is less volatile compared to TCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check TCS's competition here
LE vs YJ Comparison June 2026
LE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LE stands at 380.7M. In comparison, YJ has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LE is priced at $12.35, while YJ trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LE currently has a P/E ratio of 68.61, whereas YJ's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, LE's ROE is +1.15%, compared to YJ's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LE is more volatile compared to YJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LE.Check YJ's competition here