Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BMI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | $130.56 | +0.17% | 3.8B | 29.50 | $4.42 | +1.23% |
| SNDK | $1,648.63 | +0.40% | 243.8B | 56.16 | $29.32 | N/A |
| APH | $151.97 | +5.83% | 189.7B | 42.84 | $3.60 | +0.54% |
| GLW | $169.40 | -9.67% | 149.7B | 83.63 | $2.08 | +0.66% |
| TEL | $204.56 | -0.51% | 61.6B | 21.56 | $9.78 | +1.39% |
| KEYS | $326.28 | -1.60% | 56.6B | 53.43 | $6.20 | N/A |
| COHR | $355.36 | -11.59% | 56.4B | 168.70 | $2.11 | N/A |
| FLEX | $139.26 | -7.67% | 53.9B | 63.45 | $2.32 | N/A |
| GRMN | $234.96 | -0.12% | 45.9B | 26.55 | $8.96 | +1.52% |
| CLS | $362.76 | -6.14% | 42.8B | 45.07 | $8.25 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BMI vs SNDK Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 243.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SNDK trades at $1,648.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is 56.16. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNDK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SNDK's competition here
BMI vs APH Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while APH trades at $151.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 42.84. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check APH's competition here
BMI vs GLW Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 149.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while GLW trades at $169.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 83.63. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check GLW's competition here
BMI vs TEL Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while TEL trades at $204.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check TEL's competition here
BMI vs KEYS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while KEYS trades at $326.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 53.43. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check KEYS's competition here
BMI vs COHR Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while COHR trades at $355.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 168.70. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check COHR's competition here
BMI vs FLEX Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while FLEX trades at $139.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check FLEX's competition here
BMI vs GRMN Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while GRMN trades at $234.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check GRMN's competition here
BMI vs CLS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while CLS trades at $362.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 45.07. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check CLS's competition here
BMI vs JBL Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while JBL trades at $354.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 48.85. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check JBL's competition here
BMI vs IIVI Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check IIVI's competition here
BMI vs TDY Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while TDY trades at $613.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check TDY's competition here
BMI vs MKSI Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while MKSI trades at $313.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 65.10. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MKSI's competition here
BMI vs FN Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while FN trades at $574.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 50.44. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check FN's competition here
BMI vs TTMI Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while TTMI trades at $168.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 94.49. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check TTMI's competition here
BMI vs WDCVV Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check WDCVV's competition here
BMI vs SANM Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SANM trades at $234.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 51.46. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SANM's competition here
BMI vs VICR Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while VICR trades at $271.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 94.49. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check VICR's competition here
BMI vs TRMB Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while TRMB trades at $51.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check TRMB's competition here
BMI vs LFUS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while LFUS trades at $440.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -269.82. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LFUS's competition here
BMI vs CGNX Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while CGNX trades at $59.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 72.14. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check CGNX's competition here
BMI vs ESE Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while ESE trades at $303.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 59.85. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ESE's competition here
BMI vs PLXS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while PLXS trades at $277.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check PLXS's competition here
BMI vs ST Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while ST trades at $47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 150.48. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ST's competition here
BMI vs NOVT Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while NOVT trades at $156.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 114.75. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check NOVT's competition here
BMI vs MDA Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while MDA trades at $37.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 66.14. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MDA's competition here
BMI vs OLED Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while OLED trades at $89.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OLED's competition here
BMI vs VNT Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while VNT trades at $28.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check VNT's competition here
BMI vs ITRI Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while ITRI trades at $80.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ITRI's competition here
BMI vs OSIS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while OSIS trades at $220.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OSIS's competition here
BMI vs BELFB Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while BELFB trades at $277.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 66.36. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BELFB's competition here
BMI vs PENG Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while PENG trades at $57.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 81.01. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check PENG's competition here
BMI vs BHE Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while BHE trades at $84.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BHE's competition here
BMI vs BELFA Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while BELFA trades at $243.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 59.15. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BELFA's competition here
BMI vs ROG Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while ROG trades at $137.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -45.80. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ROG's competition here
BMI vs OUST Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while OUST trades at $39.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -41.42. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OUST's competition here
BMI vs NOVTU Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while NOVTU trades at $65.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check NOVTU's competition here
BMI vs CTS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while CTS trades at $65.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check CTS's competition here
BMI vs VPG Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while VPG trades at $125.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 272.76. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check VPG's competition here
BMI vs ALNT Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while ALNT trades at $84.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 60.78. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ALNT's competition here
BMI vs BKSY Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while BKSY trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BKSY's competition here
BMI vs DAKT Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 940.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while DAKT trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check DAKT's competition here
BMI vs KODK Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 924.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while KODK trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check KODK's competition here
BMI vs FARO Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check FARO's competition here
BMI vs SATL Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 771.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SATL trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SATL's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SATL's competition here
BMI vs LYTS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 764.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while LYTS trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LYTS's competition here
BMI vs OUST-WTA Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
BMI vs LPTH Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 673.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while LPTH trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -28.14. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LPTH's competition here
BMI vs MLAB Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 602.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while MLAB trades at $107.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 90.11. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MLAB's competition here
BMI vs AMOT Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check AMOT's competition here
BMI vs OPTX Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 468.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while OPTX trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -145.37. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OPTX's competition here
BMI vs OUST-WT Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OUST-WT's competition here
BMI vs MEI Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 381.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while MEI trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MEI's competition here
BMI vs SLNHP Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SLNHP trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SLNHP's competition here
BMI vs VLDR Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check VLDR's competition here
BMI vs BKSY-WT Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
BMI vs MPTI Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while MPTI trades at $94.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MPTI's competition here
BMI vs RELL Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 235.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while RELL trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 60.22. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check RELL's competition here
BMI vs SATLW Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SATLW trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SATLW's competition here
BMI vs SLNH Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SLNH trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SLNH's competition here
BMI vs EMAN Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check EMAN's competition here
BMI vs KULR Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while KULR trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check KULR's competition here
BMI vs USBC Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while USBC trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check USBC's competition here
BMI vs MVIS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while MVIS trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MVIS's competition here
BMI vs CPSH Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 110M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while CPSH trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 227.00. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check CPSH's competition here
BMI vs GNSS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while GNSS trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check GNSS's competition here
BMI vs SOTK Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SOTK trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SOTK's competition here
BMI vs OPTXW Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while OPTXW trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OPTXW's competition here
BMI vs LINK Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while LINK trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -52.33. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LINK's competition here
BMI vs WRAP Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while WRAP trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check WRAP's competition here
BMI vs ODYS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while ODYS trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ODYS's competition here
BMI vs ELTK Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while ELTK trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ELTK's competition here
BMI vs MIND Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while MIND trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 65.56. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MIND's competition here
BMI vs DSWL Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while DSWL trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check DSWL's competition here
BMI vs UEIC Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while UEIC trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check UEIC's competition here
BMI vs NSYS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while NSYS trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is 44.66. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check NSYS's competition here
BMI vs AMPGR Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while AMPGR trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check AMPGR's competition here
BMI vs AMPGZ Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while AMPGZ trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check AMPGZ's competition here
BMI vs LUNA Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while LUNA trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -38.67. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LUNA's competition here
BMI vs ACFN Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while ACFN trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ACFN's competition here
BMI vs LGL Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while LGL trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 695.00. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check LGL's competition here
BMI vs WATT Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while WATT trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check WATT's competition here
BMI vs ISNS Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ISNS's competition here
BMI vs DAIO Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while DAIO trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check DAIO's competition here
BMI vs WBX Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while WBX trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check WBX's competition here
BMI vs ELSE Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while ELSE trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.00. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check ELSE's competition here
BMI vs REFR Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while REFR trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check REFR's competition here
BMI vs TMPOW Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check TMPOW's competition here
BMI vs HOLO Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while HOLO trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check HOLO's competition here
BMI vs NEON Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while NEON trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check NEON's competition here
BMI vs SGMA Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SGMA's competition here
BMI vs VIAO Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check VIAO's competition here
BMI vs KNW Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check KNW's competition here
BMI vs SELX Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SELX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SELX's competition here
BMI vs MTEK Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while MTEK trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check MTEK's competition here
BMI vs GAUZ Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while GAUZ trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check GAUZ's competition here
BMI vs SVRE Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SVRE trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SVRE's competition here
BMI vs OST Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check OST's competition here
BMI vs SVREW Comparison June 2026
BMI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BMI stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BMI is priced at $130.56, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BMI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.50, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BMI's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BMI is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BMI.Check SVREW's competition here