CTS Corporation (CTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS | $65.96 | +1.15% | 1.9B | 28.37 | $2.34 | +0.24% |
| SNDK | $1,657.21 | +0.93% | 243.8B | 56.16 | $29.32 | N/A |
| APH | $152.03 | +5.87% | 189.7B | 42.84 | $3.60 | +0.54% |
| GLW | $170.43 | -9.13% | 149.7B | 83.63 | $2.08 | +0.66% |
| TEL | $205.03 | -0.28% | 61.6B | 21.56 | $9.78 | +1.39% |
| KEYS | $325.99 | -1.69% | 56.6B | 53.43 | $6.20 | N/A |
| COHR | $357.81 | -10.98% | 56.4B | 168.70 | $2.11 | N/A |
| FLEX | $140.41 | -6.91% | 53.9B | 63.45 | $2.32 | N/A |
| GRMN | $235.09 | -0.06% | 45.9B | 26.55 | $8.96 | +1.52% |
| CLS | $363.53 | -5.94% | 42.8B | 45.07 | $8.25 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CTS vs SNDK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 243.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SNDK trades at $1,657.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is 56.16. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SNDK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SNDK's competition here
CTS vs APH Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while APH trades at $152.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 42.84. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check APH's competition here
CTS vs GLW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 149.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while GLW trades at $170.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 83.63. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check GLW's competition here
CTS vs TEL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while TEL trades at $205.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check TEL's competition here
CTS vs KEYS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while KEYS trades at $325.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 53.43. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check KEYS's competition here
CTS vs COHR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while COHR trades at $357.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 168.70. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check COHR's competition here
CTS vs FLEX Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while FLEX trades at $140.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check FLEX's competition here
CTS vs GRMN Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while GRMN trades at $235.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check GRMN's competition here
CTS vs CLS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while CLS trades at $363.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 45.07. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check CLS's competition here
CTS vs JBL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while JBL trades at $355.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 48.85. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check JBL's competition here
CTS vs IIVI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check IIVI's competition here
CTS vs TDY Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while TDY trades at $613.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check TDY's competition here
CTS vs MKSI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while MKSI trades at $316.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 65.10. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MKSI's competition here
CTS vs FN Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while FN trades at $577.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 50.44. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check FN's competition here
CTS vs TTMI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while TTMI trades at $170.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 94.49. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check TTMI's competition here
CTS vs WDCVV Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check WDCVV's competition here
CTS vs SANM Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SANM trades at $235.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 51.46. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SANM's competition here
CTS vs VICR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while VICR trades at $270.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 94.49. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check VICR's competition here
CTS vs TRMB Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while TRMB trades at $51.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check TRMB's competition here
CTS vs LFUS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while LFUS trades at $444.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -269.82. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LFUS's competition here
CTS vs CGNX Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while CGNX trades at $59.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 72.14. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check CGNX's competition here
CTS vs ESE Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while ESE trades at $303.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 59.85. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ESE's competition here
CTS vs PLXS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while PLXS trades at $278.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check PLXS's competition here
CTS vs ST Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while ST trades at $48.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 150.48. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ST's competition here
CTS vs NOVT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while NOVT trades at $156.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 114.75. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check NOVT's competition here
CTS vs MDA Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while MDA trades at $37.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 66.14. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MDA's competition here
CTS vs OLED Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while OLED trades at $89.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OLED's competition here
CTS vs VNT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while VNT trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check VNT's competition here
CTS vs BMI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while BMI trades at $131.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BMI's competition here
CTS vs ITRI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while ITRI trades at $80.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ITRI's competition here
CTS vs OSIS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while OSIS trades at $220.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OSIS's competition here
CTS vs BELFB Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while BELFB trades at $278.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 66.36. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BELFB's competition here
CTS vs PENG Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while PENG trades at $57.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 81.01. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check PENG's competition here
CTS vs BHE Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while BHE trades at $84.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BHE's competition here
CTS vs BELFA Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while BELFA trades at $245.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 59.15. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BELFA's competition here
CTS vs ROG Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while ROG trades at $137.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -45.80. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ROG's competition here
CTS vs OUST Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while OUST trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -41.42. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OUST's competition here
CTS vs NOVTU Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while NOVTU trades at $65.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check NOVTU's competition here
CTS vs VPG Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while VPG trades at $124.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 272.76. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check VPG's competition here
CTS vs ALNT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while ALNT trades at $84.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 60.78. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ALNT's competition here
CTS vs BKSY Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while BKSY trades at $31.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BKSY's competition here
CTS vs DAKT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 940.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while DAKT trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check DAKT's competition here
CTS vs KODK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 924.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while KODK trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check KODK's competition here
CTS vs FARO Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check FARO's competition here
CTS vs SATL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 771.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SATL trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATL's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SATL's competition here
CTS vs LYTS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 764.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while LYTS trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LYTS's competition here
CTS vs OUST-WTA Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
CTS vs LPTH Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 673.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while LPTH trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -28.14. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LPTH's competition here
CTS vs MLAB Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 602.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while MLAB trades at $107.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 90.11. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MLAB's competition here
CTS vs AMOT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check AMOT's competition here
CTS vs OPTX Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 468.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while OPTX trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -145.37. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OPTX's competition here
CTS vs OUST-WT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OUST-WT's competition here
CTS vs MEI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 381.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while MEI trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MEI's competition here
CTS vs SLNHP Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SLNHP trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SLNHP's competition here
CTS vs VLDR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check VLDR's competition here
CTS vs BKSY-WT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
CTS vs MPTI Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while MPTI trades at $94.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MPTI's competition here
CTS vs RELL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 235.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while RELL trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 60.22. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check RELL's competition here
CTS vs SATLW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SATLW trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SATLW's competition here
CTS vs SLNH Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SLNH trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SLNH's competition here
CTS vs EMAN Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check EMAN's competition here
CTS vs KULR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while KULR trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check KULR's competition here
CTS vs USBC Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while USBC trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check USBC's competition here
CTS vs MVIS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while MVIS trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MVIS's competition here
CTS vs CPSH Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 110M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while CPSH trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 227.00. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check CPSH's competition here
CTS vs GNSS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while GNSS trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check GNSS's competition here
CTS vs SOTK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SOTK trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SOTK's competition here
CTS vs OPTXW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while OPTXW trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OPTXW's competition here
CTS vs LINK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while LINK trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -52.33. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LINK's competition here
CTS vs WRAP Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while WRAP trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check WRAP's competition here
CTS vs ODYS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while ODYS trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ODYS's competition here
CTS vs ELTK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while ELTK trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -20.58. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ELTK's competition here
CTS vs MIND Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while MIND trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 65.56. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MIND's competition here
CTS vs DSWL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while DSWL trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check DSWL's competition here
CTS vs UEIC Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while UEIC trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check UEIC's competition here
CTS vs NSYS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while NSYS trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is 44.66. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check NSYS's competition here
CTS vs AMPGR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while AMPGR trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check AMPGR's competition here
CTS vs AMPGZ Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while AMPGZ trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check AMPGZ's competition here
CTS vs LUNA Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while LUNA trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -38.67. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LUNA's competition here
CTS vs ACFN Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while ACFN trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ACFN's competition here
CTS vs LGL Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while LGL trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 695.00. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check LGL's competition here
CTS vs WATT Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while WATT trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check WATT's competition here
CTS vs ISNS Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ISNS's competition here
CTS vs DAIO Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while DAIO trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check DAIO's competition here
CTS vs WBX Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while WBX trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check WBX's competition here
CTS vs ELSE Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while ELSE trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.00. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check ELSE's competition here
CTS vs REFR Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while REFR trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check REFR's competition here
CTS vs TMPOW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check TMPOW's competition here
CTS vs HOLO Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while HOLO trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check HOLO's competition here
CTS vs NEON Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while NEON trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check NEON's competition here
CTS vs SGMA Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SGMA's competition here
CTS vs VIAO Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check VIAO's competition here
CTS vs KNW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check KNW's competition here
CTS vs SELX Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SELX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SELX's competition here
CTS vs MTEK Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while MTEK trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check MTEK's competition here
CTS vs GAUZ Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while GAUZ trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check GAUZ's competition here
CTS vs SVRE Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SVRE trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SVRE's competition here
CTS vs OST Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check OST's competition here
CTS vs SVREW Comparison June 2026
CTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTS is priced at $65.96, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTS currently has a P/E ratio of 28.37, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CTS is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTS.Check SVREW's competition here