Covanta Holding Corporation (CVA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CVA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVA | $20.26 | +0.10% | 0 | N/A | N/A | +1.58% |
| WM | $225.08 | +4.14% | 88.9B | 31.98 | $6.92 | +1.61% |
| RSG | $212.98 | +3.93% | 64.6B | 30.14 | $6.97 | +1.18% |
| WCN | $159.55 | +3.80% | 40B | 38.42 | $4.10 | +0.87% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $290.25 | +4.27% | 15.2B | 38.96 | $7.39 | N/A |
| GFL | $36.25 | +3.87% | 12.4B | 96.51 | $0.37 | +0.18% |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $89.97 | +6.37% | 5.5B | 798.27 | $0.11 | N/A |
| NVRI | $21.20 | +6.64% | 1.8B | -10.34 | -$2.05 | +71.29% |
Stock Comparison
CVA vs WM Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while WM trades at $225.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check WM's competition here
CVA vs RSG Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while RSG trades at $212.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check RSG's competition here
CVA vs WCN Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while WCN trades at $159.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check WCN's competition here
CVA vs GFLU Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GFLU's competition here
CVA vs CLH Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CLH trades at $290.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CLH's competition here
CVA vs GFL Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GFL trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 96.51. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GFL's competition here
CVA vs SRCL Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check SRCL's competition here
CVA vs CWST Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CWST trades at $89.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 798.27. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CWST's competition here
CVA vs NVRI Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while NVRI trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NVRI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check NVRI's competition here
CVA vs HCCI Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check HCCI's competition here
CVA vs HSC Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check HSC's competition here
CVA vs MEG Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while MEG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check MEG's competition here
CVA vs PESI Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 183.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while PESI trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -12.49. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check PESI's competition here
CVA vs YDDL Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while YDDL trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check YDDL's competition here
CVA vs ESGL Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ESGL trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ESGL's competition here
CVA vs LICY Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check LICY's competition here
CVA vs QRHC Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while QRHC trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check QRHC's competition here
CVA vs AMBI Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AMBI's competition here
CVA vs ENGS Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ENGS trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ENGS's competition here
CVA vs CHRA Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CHRA's competition here
CVA vs LNZA Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while LNZA trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check LNZA's competition here
CVA vs AQMS Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AQMS trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AQMS's competition here
CVA vs AWX Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while AWX trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check AWX's competition here
CVA vs CHNR Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CHNR trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -30.43. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CHNR's competition here
CVA vs GWAV Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while GWAV trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check GWAV's competition here
CVA vs DXST Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while DXST trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check DXST's competition here
CVA vs CDTG Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while CDTG trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check CDTG's competition here
CVA vs ECOL Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ECOL's competition here
CVA vs NES Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check NES's competition here
CVA vs SMED Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check SMED's competition here
CVA vs ECOLW Comparison June 2026
CVA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVA stands at 0. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVA is priced at $20.26, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVA's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVA is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVA.Check ECOLW's competition here