Energys Group Limited Ordinary Shares (ENGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ENGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENGS | $1.63 | -2.40% | 23.5M | -7.17 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| WM | $222.42 | +2.91% | 88.9B | 31.98 | $6.92 | +1.61% |
| RSG | $211.27 | +3.09% | 64.6B | 30.14 | $6.97 | +1.18% |
| WCN | $158.12 | +2.87% | 40B | 38.42 | $4.10 | +0.87% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $291.48 | +4.71% | 15.2B | 38.96 | $7.39 | N/A |
| GFL | $36.12 | +3.50% | 12.4B | 96.51 | $0.37 | +0.18% |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $88.58 | +4.72% | 5.5B | 798.27 | $0.11 | N/A |
| NVRI | $20.72 | +4.23% | 1.8B | -10.34 | -$2.05 | +71.29% |
Stock Comparison
ENGS vs WM Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while WM trades at $222.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check WM's competition here
ENGS vs RSG Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while RSG trades at $211.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check RSG's competition here
ENGS vs WCN Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while WCN trades at $158.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check WCN's competition here
ENGS vs GFLU Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check GFLU's competition here
ENGS vs CLH Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while CLH trades at $291.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check CLH's competition here
ENGS vs GFL Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while GFL trades at $36.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 96.51. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check GFL's competition here
ENGS vs SRCL Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check SRCL's competition here
ENGS vs CWST Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while CWST trades at $88.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 798.27. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check CWST's competition here
ENGS vs NVRI Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while NVRI trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NVRI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check NVRI's competition here
ENGS vs HCCI Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check HCCI's competition here
ENGS vs HSC Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check HSC's competition here
ENGS vs MEG Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while MEG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check MEG's competition here
ENGS vs PESI Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 183.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while PESI trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -12.49. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check PESI's competition here
ENGS vs YDDL Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while YDDL trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check YDDL's competition here
ENGS vs ESGL Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while ESGL trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check ESGL's competition here
ENGS vs LICY Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check LICY's competition here
ENGS vs QRHC Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while QRHC trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check QRHC's competition here
ENGS vs AMBI Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check AMBI's competition here
ENGS vs CHRA Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check CHRA's competition here
ENGS vs LNZA Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while LNZA trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check LNZA's competition here
ENGS vs AQMS Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while AQMS trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check AQMS's competition here
ENGS vs AWX Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while AWX trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check AWX's competition here
ENGS vs CHNR Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while CHNR trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -30.43. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check CHNR's competition here
ENGS vs GWAV Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while GWAV trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check GWAV's competition here
ENGS vs DXST Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while DXST trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check DXST's competition here
ENGS vs CDTG Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while CDTG trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check CDTG's competition here
ENGS vs CVA Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check CVA's competition here
ENGS vs ECOL Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check ECOL's competition here
ENGS vs ECOLW Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check ECOLW's competition here
ENGS vs NES Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check NES's competition here
ENGS vs SMED Comparison June 2026
ENGS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ENGS stands at 23.5M. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ENGS is priced at $1.63, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ENGS currently has a P/E ratio of -7.17, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, ENGS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ENGS is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ENGS.Check SMED's competition here