Edap Tms S.a. (EDAP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EDAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDAP | $4.76 | -0.52% | 178.2M | -5.80 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| BSX-PA | $122.18 | +2.37% | 175.4B | 230.53 | $0.53 | N/A |
| ABT | $89.17 | -2.28% | 155.2B | 25.11 | $3.55 | +2.67% |
| ISRG | $412.02 | -3.42% | 145.9B | 49.94 | $8.25 | N/A |
| SYK | $308.84 | -1.65% | 118.4B | 35.69 | $8.65 | +1.09% |
| MDT | $80.25 | -2.11% | 103B | 21.52 | $3.73 | +3.46% |
| BSX | $48.34 | -1.27% | 71.8B | 20.22 | $2.39 | N/A |
| EW | $85.98 | -1.78% | 49.5B | 46.49 | $1.85 | N/A |
| DXCM | $74.77 | -4.37% | 28.9B | 32.09 | $2.33 | N/A |
| RMD | $193.57 | -1.71% | 28.1B | 18.67 | $10.37 | +1.22% |
Stock Comparison
EDAP vs BSX-PA Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, BSX-PA has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while BSX-PA trades at $122.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BSX-PA's P/E ratio is 230.53. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BSX-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to BSX-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check BSX-PA's competition here
EDAP vs ABT Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ABT has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ABT trades at $89.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ABT's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ABT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to ABT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ABT's competition here
EDAP vs ISRG Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ISRG has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ISRG trades at $412.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ISRG's P/E ratio is 49.94. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ISRG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to ISRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ISRG's competition here
EDAP vs SYK Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SYK has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SYK trades at $308.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SYK's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SYK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to SYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SYK's competition here
EDAP vs MDT Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, MDT has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while MDT trades at $80.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas MDT's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to MDT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to MDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check MDT's competition here
EDAP vs BSX Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, BSX has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while BSX trades at $48.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BSX's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BSX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to BSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check BSX's competition here
EDAP vs EW Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, EW has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while EW trades at $85.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas EW's P/E ratio is 46.49. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to EW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to EW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check EW's competition here
EDAP vs DXCM Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, DXCM has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while DXCM trades at $74.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas DXCM's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to DXCM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to DXCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check DXCM's competition here
EDAP vs RMD Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, RMD has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while RMD trades at $193.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas RMD's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to RMD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to RMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check RMD's competition here
EDAP vs PHG Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, PHG has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while PHG trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PHG's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to PHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check PHG's competition here
EDAP vs STE Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, STE has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while STE trades at $208.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas STE's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to STE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to STE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check STE's competition here
EDAP vs ABMD Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ABMD has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ABMD trades at $381.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ABMD's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ABMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to ABMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ABMD's competition here
EDAP vs ZBH Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ZBH has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ZBH trades at $88.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ZBH's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ZBH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to ZBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ZBH's competition here
EDAP vs SNN Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SNN has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SNN trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SNN's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SNN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to SNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SNN's competition here
EDAP vs SWAV Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SWAV has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SWAV trades at $334.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SWAV's P/E ratio is 78.76. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to SWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SWAV's competition here
EDAP vs PEN Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, PEN has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while PEN trades at $319.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PEN's P/E ratio is 73.75. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PEN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to PEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check PEN's competition here
EDAP vs ALGN Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ALGN has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ALGN trades at $170.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ALGN's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ALGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to ALGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ALGN's competition here
EDAP vs GMED Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, GMED has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while GMED trades at $80.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas GMED's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to GMED's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to GMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check GMED's competition here
EDAP vs PODD Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, PODD has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while PODD trades at $150.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PODD's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PODD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to PODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check PODD's competition here
EDAP vs MASI Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, MASI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while MASI trades at $179.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas MASI's P/E ratio is 44.43. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to MASI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to MASI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check MASI's competition here
EDAP vs BRKR Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, BRKR has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while BRKR trades at $54.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BRKR's P/E ratio is -228.83. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BRKR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to BRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check BRKR's competition here
EDAP vs BIO-B Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, BIO-B has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while BIO-B trades at $307.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BIO-B's P/E ratio is 51.10. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BIO-B's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to BIO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check BIO-B's competition here
EDAP vs BRKRP Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, BRKRP has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while BRKRP trades at $410.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BRKRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BRKRP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to BRKRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check BRKRP's competition here
EDAP vs BIO Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, BIO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while BIO trades at $291.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BIO's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BIO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to BIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check BIO's competition here
EDAP vs GKOS Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, GKOS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while GKOS trades at $122.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas GKOS's P/E ratio is -37.04. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to GKOS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to GKOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check GKOS's competition here
EDAP vs NARI Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, NARI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while NARI trades at $79.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas NARI's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to NARI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to NARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check NARI's competition here
EDAP vs LIVN Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, LIVN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while LIVN trades at $78.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas LIVN's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to LIVN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to LIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check LIVN's competition here
EDAP vs IRTC Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, IRTC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while IRTC trades at $113.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas IRTC's P/E ratio is -134.05. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to IRTC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to IRTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check IRTC's competition here
EDAP vs AXNX Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while AXNX trades at $70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -709.80. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check AXNX's competition here
EDAP vs ITGR Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ITGR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ITGR trades at $91.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ITGR's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ITGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to ITGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ITGR's competition here
EDAP vs TMDX Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, TMDX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while TMDX trades at $74.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas TMDX's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to TMDX's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to TMDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check TMDX's competition here
EDAP vs ESTA Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ESTA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ESTA trades at $79.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ESTA's P/E ratio is -54.05. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ESTA's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to ESTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ESTA's competition here
EDAP vs AXGN Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, AXGN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while AXGN trades at $41.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas AXGN's P/E ratio is -64.62. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to AXGN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to AXGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check AXGN's competition here
EDAP vs NUVA Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, NUVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while NUVA trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas NUVA's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to NUVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to NUVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check NUVA's competition here
EDAP vs UFPT Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, UFPT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while UFPT trades at $232.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas UFPT's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to UFPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to UFPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check UFPT's competition here
EDAP vs PRCT Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, PRCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while PRCT trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PRCT's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PRCT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to PRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check PRCT's competition here
EDAP vs BFLY Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, BFLY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while BFLY trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BFLY's P/E ratio is -17.95. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BFLY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to BFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check BFLY's competition here
EDAP vs AHCO Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, AHCO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while AHCO trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas AHCO's P/E ratio is -16.81. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to AHCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to AHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check AHCO's competition here
EDAP vs IART Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, IART has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while IART trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas IART's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to IART's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to IART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check IART's competition here
EDAP vs HSKA Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, HSKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while HSKA trades at $119.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas HSKA's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to HSKA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to HSKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check HSKA's competition here
EDAP vs ENOV Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ENOV trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ENOV's competition here
EDAP vs ATEC Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ATEC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ATEC trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ATEC's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ATEC's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to ATEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ATEC's competition here
EDAP vs IRMD Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, IRMD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while IRMD trades at $96.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas IRMD's P/E ratio is 52.46. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to IRMD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to IRMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check IRMD's competition here
EDAP vs INSP Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, INSP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while INSP trades at $42.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas INSP's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to INSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to INSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check INSP's competition here
EDAP vs AVNS Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, AVNS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while AVNS trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas AVNS's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to AVNS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to AVNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check AVNS's competition here
EDAP vs SILK Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SILK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SILK trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SILK's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SILK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to SILK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SILK's competition here
EDAP vs TNDM Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, TNDM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while TNDM trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas TNDM's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to TNDM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to TNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check TNDM's competition here
EDAP vs FNA Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, FNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while FNA trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas FNA's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to FNA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to FNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check FNA's competition here
EDAP vs CNMD Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, CNMD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while CNMD trades at $36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CNMD's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CNMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to CNMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check CNMD's competition here
EDAP vs AORT Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, AORT has a market cap of 993.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while AORT trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas AORT's P/E ratio is 81.88. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to AORT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to AORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check AORT's competition here
EDAP vs LMRI Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, LMRI has a market cap of 868.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while LMRI trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas LMRI's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to LMRI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to LMRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check LMRI's competition here
EDAP vs CSII Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, CSII has a market cap of 844M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while CSII trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CSII's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CSII's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to CSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check CSII's competition here
EDAP vs INMD Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, INMD has a market cap of 819.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while INMD trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas INMD's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to INMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to INMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check INMD's competition here
EDAP vs CRY Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, CRY has a market cap of 725.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while CRY trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CRY's P/E ratio is 425.71. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to CRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check CRY's competition here
EDAP vs SSII Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SSII has a market cap of 704.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SSII trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SSII's P/E ratio is -70.40. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SSII's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to SSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SSII's competition here
EDAP vs CBLL Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, CBLL has a market cap of 697.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while CBLL trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CBLL's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CBLL's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to CBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check CBLL's competition here
EDAP vs SIBN Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SIBN has a market cap of 681.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SIBN trades at $15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SIBN's P/E ratio is -39.41. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SIBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to SIBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SIBN's competition here
EDAP vs SRDX Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SRDX has a market cap of 614.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SRDX trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SRDX's P/E ratio is -34.66. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SRDX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to SRDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SRDX's competition here
EDAP vs BVS Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, BVS has a market cap of 613.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while BVS trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BVS's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BVS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to BVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check BVS's competition here
EDAP vs TCMD Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, TCMD has a market cap of 585.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while TCMD trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas TCMD's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to TCMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to TCMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check TCMD's competition here
EDAP vs APEN Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, APEN has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while APEN trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas APEN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to APEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to APEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check APEN's competition here
EDAP vs BWAY Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, BWAY has a market cap of 558.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while BWAY trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BWAY's P/E ratio is 64.68. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to BWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check BWAY's competition here
EDAP vs ZIMV Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ZIMV has a market cap of 535.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ZIMV trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ZIMV's P/E ratio is -27.52. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ZIMV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to ZIMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ZIMV's competition here
EDAP vs NPCE Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, NPCE has a market cap of 535.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while NPCE trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas NPCE's P/E ratio is -24.17. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to NPCE's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to NPCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check NPCE's competition here
EDAP vs CTKB Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, CTKB has a market cap of 523M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while CTKB trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CTKB's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CTKB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to CTKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check CTKB's competition here
EDAP vs CERS Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, CERS has a market cap of 512.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while CERS trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CERS's P/E ratio is -51.20. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CERS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to CERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check CERS's competition here
EDAP vs KIDS Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, KIDS has a market cap of 474.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while KIDS trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas KIDS's P/E ratio is -10.99. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to KIDS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to KIDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check KIDS's competition here
EDAP vs VREX Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, VREX has a market cap of 443.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while VREX trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas VREX's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to VREX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to VREX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check VREX's competition here
EDAP vs PACB Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, PACB has a market cap of 425.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while PACB trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PACB's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PACB's ROE of -4.88%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to PACB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check PACB's competition here
EDAP vs CLPT Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, CLPT has a market cap of 412.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while CLPT trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CLPT's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CLPT's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to CLPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check CLPT's competition here
EDAP vs OFIX Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, OFIX has a market cap of 393.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while OFIX trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas OFIX's P/E ratio is -6.49. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to OFIX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to OFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check OFIX's competition here
EDAP vs VMD Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, VMD has a market cap of 388.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while VMD trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas VMD's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to VMD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to VMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check VMD's competition here
EDAP vs DCTH Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, DCTH has a market cap of 386.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while DCTH trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas DCTH's P/E ratio is 1119.00. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to DCTH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to DCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check DCTH's competition here
EDAP vs AVR Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, AVR has a market cap of 349.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while AVR trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas AVR's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to AVR's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to AVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check AVR's competition here
EDAP vs LAB Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, LAB has a market cap of 344M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while LAB trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas LAB's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to LAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to LAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check LAB's competition here
EDAP vs PMI Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, PMI has a market cap of 325.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while PMI trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PMI's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PMI's ROE of +4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to PMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check PMI's competition here
EDAP vs SMLR Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SMLR has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SMLR trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SMLR's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SMLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to SMLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SMLR's competition here
EDAP vs ELMD Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ELMD has a market cap of 307.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ELMD trades at $37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ELMD's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ELMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to ELMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ELMD's competition here
EDAP vs SENS Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SENS has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SENS trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SENS's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SENS's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to SENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SENS's competition here
EDAP vs MASS Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, MASS has a market cap of 302.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while MASS trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas MASS's P/E ratio is -8.26. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to MASS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to MASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check MASS's competition here
EDAP vs TMCI Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, TMCI has a market cap of 274.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while TMCI trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas TMCI's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to TMCI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to TMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check TMCI's competition here
EDAP vs SGHT Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SGHT has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SGHT trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SGHT's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SGHT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to SGHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SGHT's competition here
EDAP vs MGRM Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, MGRM has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while MGRM trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas MGRM's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to MGRM's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to MGRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check MGRM's competition here
EDAP vs CATX Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, CATX has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while CATX trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CATX's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CATX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to CATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check CATX's competition here
EDAP vs NVRO Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, NVRO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while NVRO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas NVRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to NVRO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to NVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check NVRO's competition here
EDAP vs EYES Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, EYES has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while EYES trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas EYES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to EYES's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to EYES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check EYES's competition here
EDAP vs PROF Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, PROF has a market cap of 203M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while PROF trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas PROF's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to PROF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to PROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check PROF's competition here
EDAP vs ANIK Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, ANIK has a market cap of 198.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while ANIK trades at $14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas ANIK's P/E ratio is -18.64. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to ANIK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to ANIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check ANIK's competition here
EDAP vs APYX Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, APYX has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while APYX trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas APYX's P/E ratio is -20.95. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to APYX's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to APYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check APYX's competition here
EDAP vs BSGM Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, BSGM has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while BSGM trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas BSGM's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to BSGM's ROE of +17.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to BSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check BSGM's competition here
EDAP vs RXST Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, RXST has a market cap of 190.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while RXST trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas RXST's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to RXST's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to RXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check RXST's competition here
EDAP vs MDGS Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, MDGS has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while MDGS trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas MDGS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to MDGS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to MDGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check MDGS's competition here
EDAP vs INGN Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, INGN has a market cap of 178.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while INGN trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas INGN's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to INGN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to INGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check INGN's competition here
EDAP vs FOCL Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, FOCL has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while FOCL trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas FOCL's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to FOCL's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to FOCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check FOCL's competition here
EDAP vs QIPT Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, QIPT has a market cap of 162.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while QIPT trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas QIPT's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to QIPT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to QIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check QIPT's competition here
EDAP vs QTRX Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, QTRX has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while QTRX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas QTRX's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to QTRX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to QTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check QTRX's competition here
EDAP vs TLSI Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, TLSI has a market cap of 134.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while TLSI trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas TLSI's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to TLSI's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to TLSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check TLSI's competition here
EDAP vs CVRX Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, CVRX has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while CVRX trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas CVRX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to CVRX's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is less volatile compared to CVRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check CVRX's competition here
EDAP vs SNWV Comparison June 2026
EDAP plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDAP stands at 178.2M. In comparison, SNWV has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDAP is priced at $4.76, while SNWV trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDAP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.80, whereas SNWV's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, EDAP's ROE is -1.49%, compared to SNWV's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EDAP is more volatile compared to SNWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDAP.Check SNWV's competition here