ShockWave Medical, Inc. (SWAV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SWAV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWAV | $334.75 | -0.02% | 12.6B | 78.76 | $4.25 | N/A |
| BSX-PA | $122.18 | +2.37% | 175.4B | 230.53 | $0.53 | N/A |
| ABT | $90.06 | -0.49% | 158.9B | 25.70 | $3.55 | +2.67% |
| ISRG | $421.70 | +0.74% | 151.1B | 51.71 | $8.25 | N/A |
| SYK | $314.50 | +4.30% | 120.4B | 36.31 | $8.65 | +1.09% |
| MDT | $81.42 | +0.90% | 105.2B | 21.98 | $3.73 | +3.46% |
| BSX | $48.54 | -0.33% | 72.7B | 20.47 | $2.39 | N/A |
| BRKRP | $425.79 | +1.50% | 64.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.35% |
| EW | $86.23 | +0.44% | 50.4B | 47.31 | $1.85 | N/A |
| DXCM | $77.87 | +1.63% | 30.2B | 33.56 | $2.33 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SWAV vs BSX-PA Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BSX-PA has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while BSX-PA trades at $122.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BSX-PA's P/E ratio is 230.53. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSX-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to BSX-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check BSX-PA's competition here
SWAV vs ABT Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ABT has a market cap of 158.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ABT trades at $90.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ABT's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ABT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ABT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ABT's competition here
SWAV vs ISRG Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ISRG has a market cap of 151.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ISRG trades at $421.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ISRG's P/E ratio is 51.71. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ISRG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ISRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ISRG's competition here
SWAV vs SYK Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SYK has a market cap of 120.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while SYK trades at $314.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SYK's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to SYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check SYK's competition here
SWAV vs MDT Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MDT has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while MDT trades at $81.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MDT's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MDT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to MDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check MDT's competition here
SWAV vs BSX Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BSX has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while BSX trades at $48.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BSX's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to BSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check BSX's competition here
SWAV vs BRKRP Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BRKRP has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while BRKRP trades at $425.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BRKRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRKRP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to BRKRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check BRKRP's competition here
SWAV vs EW Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, EW has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while EW trades at $86.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas EW's P/E ratio is 47.31. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to EW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check EW's competition here
SWAV vs DXCM Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DXCM has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while DXCM trades at $77.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas DXCM's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DXCM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to DXCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check DXCM's competition here
SWAV vs RMD Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RMD has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while RMD trades at $196.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas RMD's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RMD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to RMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check RMD's competition here
SWAV vs PHG Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PHG has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while PHG trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas PHG's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to PHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check PHG's competition here
SWAV vs STE Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, STE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while STE trades at $211.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas STE's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to STE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check STE's competition here
SWAV vs ZBH Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ZBH has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ZBH trades at $89.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ZBH's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZBH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ZBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ZBH's competition here
SWAV vs ABMD Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ABMD has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ABMD trades at $381.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ABMD's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ABMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ABMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ABMD's competition here
SWAV vs SNN Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SNN has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while SNN trades at $31.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SNN's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SNN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to SNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check SNN's competition here
SWAV vs ALGN Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ALGN has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ALGN trades at $177.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ALGN's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ALGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ALGN's competition here
SWAV vs PEN Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PEN has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while PEN trades at $320.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas PEN's P/E ratio is 74.16. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to PEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check PEN's competition here
SWAV vs GMED Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, GMED has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while GMED trades at $82.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas GMED's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GMED's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to GMED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check GMED's competition here
SWAV vs PODD Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PODD has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while PODD trades at $157.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas PODD's P/E ratio is 37.29. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PODD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to PODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check PODD's competition here
SWAV vs MASI Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MASI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while MASI trades at $179.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MASI's P/E ratio is 44.54. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MASI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is more volatile compared to MASI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check MASI's competition here
SWAV vs BRKR Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BRKR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while BRKR trades at $57.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BRKR's P/E ratio is -238.50. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRKR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to BRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check BRKR's competition here
SWAV vs BIO-B Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BIO-B has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while BIO-B trades at $307.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BIO-B's P/E ratio is 51.10. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BIO-B's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is more volatile compared to BIO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check BIO-B's competition here
SWAV vs BIO Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BIO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while BIO trades at $297.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BIO's P/E ratio is 49.57. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BIO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to BIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check BIO's competition here
SWAV vs GKOS Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, GKOS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while GKOS trades at $122.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas GKOS's P/E ratio is -38.21. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GKOS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to GKOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check GKOS's competition here
SWAV vs NARI Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NARI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while NARI trades at $79.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas NARI's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NARI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is more volatile compared to NARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check NARI's competition here
SWAV vs LIVN Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, LIVN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while LIVN trades at $78.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas LIVN's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LIVN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to LIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check LIVN's competition here
SWAV vs IRTC Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, IRTC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while IRTC trades at $116.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas IRTC's P/E ratio is -133.92. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IRTC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to IRTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check IRTC's competition here
SWAV vs AXNX Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while AXNX trades at $70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -709.80. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is more volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check AXNX's competition here
SWAV vs ITGR Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ITGR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ITGR trades at $93.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ITGR's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ITGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ITGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ITGR's competition here
SWAV vs TMDX Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TMDX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while TMDX trades at $75.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TMDX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TMDX's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to TMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check TMDX's competition here
SWAV vs ESTA Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ESTA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ESTA trades at $81.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ESTA's P/E ratio is -54.30. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ESTA's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ESTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ESTA's competition here
SWAV vs AXGN Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AXGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while AXGN trades at $42.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AXGN's P/E ratio is -66.98. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AXGN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to AXGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check AXGN's competition here
SWAV vs NUVA Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NUVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while NUVA trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas NUVA's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NUVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to NUVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check NUVA's competition here
SWAV vs UFPT Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, UFPT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while UFPT trades at $232.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas UFPT's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to UFPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to UFPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check UFPT's competition here
SWAV vs PRCT Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PRCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while PRCT trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas PRCT's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRCT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to PRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check PRCT's competition here
SWAV vs IART Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, IART has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while IART trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas IART's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IART's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to IART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check IART's competition here
SWAV vs ENOV Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ENOV trades at $23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ENOV's competition here
SWAV vs BFLY Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BFLY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while BFLY trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BFLY's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BFLY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to BFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check BFLY's competition here
SWAV vs AHCO Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AHCO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while AHCO trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AHCO's P/E ratio is -16.63. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AHCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to AHCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check AHCO's competition here
SWAV vs HSKA Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, HSKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while HSKA trades at $119.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas HSKA's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HSKA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is more volatile compared to HSKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check HSKA's competition here
SWAV vs ATEC Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ATEC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ATEC trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ATEC's P/E ratio is -9.95. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATEC's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ATEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ATEC's competition here
SWAV vs IRMD Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, IRMD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while IRMD trades at $97.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas IRMD's P/E ratio is 52.69. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IRMD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to IRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check IRMD's competition here
SWAV vs INSP Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, INSP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while INSP trades at $42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas INSP's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to INSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check INSP's competition here
SWAV vs TNDM Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TNDM has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while TNDM trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TNDM's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TNDM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to TNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check TNDM's competition here
SWAV vs AVNS Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AVNS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while AVNS trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AVNS's P/E ratio is -15.64. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AVNS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to AVNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check AVNS's competition here
SWAV vs SILK Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SILK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while SILK trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SILK's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SILK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV and SILK have similar daily volatility (0.04).Check SILK's competition here
SWAV vs CNMD Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CNMD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while CNMD trades at $36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CNMD's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CNMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to CNMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check CNMD's competition here
SWAV vs FNA Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while FNA trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas FNA's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FNA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to FNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check FNA's competition here
SWAV vs AORT Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AORT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while AORT trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AORT's P/E ratio is 83.48. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AORT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to AORT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check AORT's competition here
SWAV vs CSII Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CSII has a market cap of 844M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while CSII trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CSII's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CSII's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to CSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check CSII's competition here
SWAV vs LMRI Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, LMRI has a market cap of 831.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while LMRI trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas LMRI's P/E ratio is -22.18. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LMRI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to LMRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check LMRI's competition here
SWAV vs INMD Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, INMD has a market cap of 824.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while INMD trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas INMD's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to INMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check INMD's competition here
SWAV vs SSII Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SSII has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while SSII trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SSII's P/E ratio is -72.60. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SSII's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to SSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check SSII's competition here
SWAV vs CRY Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CRY has a market cap of 725.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while CRY trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CRY's P/E ratio is 425.71. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to CRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check CRY's competition here
SWAV vs CBLL Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CBLL has a market cap of 701.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while CBLL trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CBLL's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CBLL's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to CBLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check CBLL's competition here
SWAV vs SIBN Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SIBN has a market cap of 688.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while SIBN trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SIBN's P/E ratio is -39.82. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SIBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to SIBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check SIBN's competition here
SWAV vs BVS Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BVS has a market cap of 623.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while BVS trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BVS's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BVS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to BVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check BVS's competition here
SWAV vs SRDX Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SRDX has a market cap of 614.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while SRDX trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SRDX's P/E ratio is -34.66. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SRDX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is more volatile compared to SRDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check SRDX's competition here
SWAV vs TCMD Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TCMD has a market cap of 594.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while TCMD trades at $26.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TCMD's P/E ratio is 30.28. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TCMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to TCMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check TCMD's competition here
SWAV vs APEN Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, APEN has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while APEN trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas APEN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to APEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to APEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check APEN's competition here
SWAV vs BWAY Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BWAY has a market cap of 566M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while BWAY trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BWAY's P/E ratio is 65.59. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to BWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check BWAY's competition here
SWAV vs NPCE Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NPCE has a market cap of 544.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while NPCE trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas NPCE's P/E ratio is -24.55. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NPCE's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to NPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check NPCE's competition here
SWAV vs ZIMV Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ZIMV has a market cap of 535.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ZIMV trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ZIMV's P/E ratio is -27.52. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ZIMV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is more volatile compared to ZIMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ZIMV's competition here
SWAV vs CTKB Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CTKB has a market cap of 533.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while CTKB trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CTKB's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CTKB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to CTKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check CTKB's competition here
SWAV vs CERS Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CERS has a market cap of 517M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while CERS trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CERS's P/E ratio is -51.60. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CERS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to CERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check CERS's competition here
SWAV vs PMI Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PMI has a market cap of 492.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while PMI trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas PMI's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PMI's ROE of +4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to PMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check PMI's competition here
SWAV vs KIDS Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, KIDS has a market cap of 474.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while KIDS trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas KIDS's P/E ratio is -11.01. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KIDS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to KIDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check KIDS's competition here
SWAV vs VREX Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, VREX has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while VREX trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas VREX's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VREX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to VREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check VREX's competition here
SWAV vs PACB Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PACB has a market cap of 425.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while PACB trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas PACB's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PACB's ROE of -4.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to PACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check PACB's competition here
SWAV vs CLPT Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CLPT has a market cap of 407.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while CLPT trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CLPT's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CLPT's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to CLPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check CLPT's competition here
SWAV vs DCTH Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, DCTH has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while DCTH trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas DCTH's P/E ratio is 1169.00. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DCTH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to DCTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check DCTH's competition here
SWAV vs OFIX Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, OFIX has a market cap of 399M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while OFIX trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas OFIX's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OFIX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to OFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check OFIX's competition here
SWAV vs VMD Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, VMD has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while VMD trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas VMD's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VMD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to VMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check VMD's competition here
SWAV vs AVR Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, AVR has a market cap of 348.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while AVR trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AVR's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AVR's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to AVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check AVR's competition here
SWAV vs LAB Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, LAB has a market cap of 345.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while LAB trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas LAB's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to LAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check LAB's competition here
SWAV vs SMLR Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SMLR has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while SMLR trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SMLR's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is more volatile compared to SMLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check SMLR's competition here
SWAV vs SENS Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SENS has a market cap of 310.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while SENS trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SENS's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SENS's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to SENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check SENS's competition here
SWAV vs MASS Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MASS has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while MASS trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MASS's P/E ratio is -8.24. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MASS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to MASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check MASS's competition here
SWAV vs ELMD Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ELMD has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ELMD trades at $37.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ELMD's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ELMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ELMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ELMD's competition here
SWAV vs SGHT Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, SGHT has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while SGHT trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SGHT's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SGHT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to SGHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check SGHT's competition here
SWAV vs MGRM Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MGRM has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while MGRM trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MGRM's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MGRM's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is more volatile compared to MGRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check MGRM's competition here
SWAV vs TMCI Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TMCI has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while TMCI trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TMCI's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TMCI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to TMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check TMCI's competition here
SWAV vs CATX Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CATX has a market cap of 231.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while CATX trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CATX's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CATX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to CATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check CATX's competition here
SWAV vs NVRO Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, NVRO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while NVRO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas NVRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NVRO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to NVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check NVRO's competition here
SWAV vs EYES Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, EYES has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while EYES trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas EYES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EYES's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to EYES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check EYES's competition here
SWAV vs PROF Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, PROF has a market cap of 206.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while PROF trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas PROF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PROF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to PROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check PROF's competition here
SWAV vs APYX Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, APYX has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while APYX trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas APYX's P/E ratio is -22.09. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to APYX's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to APYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check APYX's competition here
SWAV vs RXST Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, RXST has a market cap of 203.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while RXST trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas RXST's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RXST's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to RXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check RXST's competition here
SWAV vs ANIK Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, ANIK has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while ANIK trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ANIK's P/E ratio is -18.21. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ANIK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to ANIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check ANIK's competition here
SWAV vs BSGM Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, BSGM has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while BSGM trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BSGM's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BSGM's ROE of +17.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to BSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check BSGM's competition here
SWAV vs MDGS Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MDGS has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while MDGS trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MDGS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MDGS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to MDGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check MDGS's competition here
SWAV vs EDAP Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, EDAP has a market cap of 178.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while EDAP trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas EDAP's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EDAP's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to EDAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check EDAP's competition here
SWAV vs INGN Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, INGN has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while INGN trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas INGN's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INGN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to INGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check INGN's competition here
SWAV vs FOCL Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, FOCL has a market cap of 171.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while FOCL trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas FOCL's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FOCL's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to FOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check FOCL's competition here
SWAV vs QIPT Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, QIPT has a market cap of 162.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while QIPT trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas QIPT's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QIPT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is more volatile compared to QIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check QIPT's competition here
SWAV vs QTRX Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, QTRX has a market cap of 145.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while QTRX trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas QTRX's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QTRX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to QTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check QTRX's competition here
SWAV vs CVRX Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, CVRX has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while CVRX trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CVRX's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CVRX's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to CVRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check CVRX's competition here
SWAV vs MXCT Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, MXCT has a market cap of 127.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while MXCT trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MXCT's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MXCT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to MXCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check MXCT's competition here
SWAV vs TLSI Comparison June 2026
SWAV plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWAV stands at 12.6B. In comparison, TLSI has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWAV is priced at $334.75, while TLSI trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWAV currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TLSI's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, SWAV's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TLSI's ROE of +1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SWAV is less volatile compared to TLSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWAV.Check TLSI's competition here