Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while HDB trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check HDB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 116.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while MFG trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check MFG's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while IBN trades at $26.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check IBN's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while PNC trades at $233.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check PNC's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while USB-PA trades at $767.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 218.65. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check USB-PA's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while ITUB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check ITUB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while LYG trades at $5.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check LYG's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while USB-PS trades at $17.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check USB-PS's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while TFC trades at $49.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check TFC's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while TFC-PR trades at $18.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check TFC-PR's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while DB trades at $31.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check DB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FITB trades at $52.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FITB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FITBM trades at $26.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FITBM's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while HBANZ trades at $20.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check HBANZ's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while HBANL trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check HBANL's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while BSBR trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check BSBR's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while KB trades at $102.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check KB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while BBD trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check BBD's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while HBAN trades at $16.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check HBAN's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while MTB trades at $224.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check MTB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while HBANM trades at $20.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check HBANM's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while SHG trades at $64.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check SHG's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while BBDO trades at $2.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check BBDO's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CFG trades at $65.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CFG's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while KEY-PL trades at $24.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check KEY-PL's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CFG-PH trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CFG-PH's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CFG-PE trades at $18.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CFG-PE's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while TFC-PO trades at $20.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check TFC-PO's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while HBANP trades at $16.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check HBANP's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while RF-PE trades at $15.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check RF-PE's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while RF-PC trades at $24.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check RF-PC's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while RF trades at $28.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check RF's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FCNCA trades at $2,123.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FCNCA's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while TFC-PI trades at $18.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check TFC-PI's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while KEY trades at $22.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check KEY's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check KEY-PJ's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while KEY-PK trades at $20.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check KEY-PK's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FCNCN trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FCNCN's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while RF-PF trades at $25.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check RF-PF's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while KEY-PI trades at $25.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check KEY-PI's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while BCH trades at $38.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check BCH's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CIB trades at $74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CIB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FITBI trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FITBI's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FITBP trades at $23.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FITBP's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CFG-PD's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while BSAC trades at $31.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check BSAC's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while WF trades at $59.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check WF's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while VLYPN trades at $26.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check VLYPN's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FHN-PC trades at $31.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FHN-PC's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FITBO trades at $18.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FITBO's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FHN-PB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FHN-PE trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FHN-PE's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while WBS trades at $72.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check WBS's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FHN trades at $24.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FHN's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CMA trades at $88.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CMA's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while WTFC trades at $155.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check WTFC's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while BPOP trades at $157.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check BPOP's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while UMBF trades at $132.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check UMBF's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while ZION trades at $65.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check ZION's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while ONBPO trades at $24.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check ONBPO's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while ONBPP trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check ONBPP's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while ONB trades at $24.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check ONB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while SSB trades at $96.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check SSB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ZIONP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while ZIONP trades at $18.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas ZIONP's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZIONP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to ZIONP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check ZIONP's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CFR trades at $144.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CFR's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while WAL trades at $81.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check WAL's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FHN-PD's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WAL-PA has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while WAL-PA trades at $24.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas WAL-PA's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to WAL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check WAL-PA's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FHN-PF trades at $17.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FHN-PF's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while GGAL trades at $49.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 135.11. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check GGAL's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while BOKF trades at $132.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check BOKF's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CBSH trades at $54.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CBSH's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CADE trades at $42.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CADE's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while VLY trades at $14.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check VLY's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check BSMX's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while PNFP trades at $94.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check PNFP's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while COLB trades at $30.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check COLB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while PB trades at $71.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check PB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while SNV trades at $50.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check SNV's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CBC trades at $28.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CBC's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check SNV-PD's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CHYM trades at $17.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CHYM's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check CUBI-PE's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FNB trades at $18.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FNB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while GBCI trades at $48.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check GBCI's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while UBSI trades at $44.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check UBSI's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while AVAL trades at $4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check AVAL's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while FLG trades at $14.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -67.76. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check FLG's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while IFS trades at $52.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check IFS's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while ABCB trades at $86.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check ABCB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while HWC trades at $70.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check HWC's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while BMA trades at $86.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check BMA's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while OZK trades at $51.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check OZK's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while AUB trades at $38.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check AUB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while HOMB trades at $27.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check HOMB's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while VLYPO trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check VLYPO's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while VLYPP trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check VLYPP's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check BXS's competition here

FULT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FULT stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FULT is priced at $22.72, while AX trades at $89.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FULT currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, FULT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FULT is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FULT.Check AX's competition here