Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while MRSH trades at $168.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check MRSH's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while AON trades at $338.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check AON's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while AJG trades at $222.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check AJG's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while WLTW trades at $231.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check WLTW's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while WTW trades at $266.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to WTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check WTW's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while BRO trades at $60.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check BRO's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while ERIE trades at $232.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check ERIE's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while CRVL trades at $61.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check CRVL's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while ARX trades at $14.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check ARX's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while BRP trades at $32.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check BRP's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while FANH trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check FANH's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while BWIN trades at $19.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -28.06. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check BWIN's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 532.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while CRD-A trades at $11.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check CRD-A's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 509.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while CRD-B trades at $10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check CRD-B's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while TWFG trades at $21.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check TWFG's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while SLQT trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -84.05. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check SLQT's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while EHTH trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check EHTH's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while ZBAO trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check ZBAO's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while GOCO trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check GOCO's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while EZRA trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check EZRA's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while RELI trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check RELI's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 691.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while HUIZ trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check HUIZ's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check EZRAW's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while RELIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check RELIW's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while TIRX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check TIRX's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while EFM trades at $25.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check EFM's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while MER trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check MER's competition here

MMC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MMC stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MMC is priced at $182.70, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MMC currently has a P/E ratio of 21.93, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMC's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMC is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMC.Check GIWWW's competition here