SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLQT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLQT | $0.85 | +1.38% | 148.2M | -84.05 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| MMC | $182.70 | -1.58% | 89.8B | 21.93 | $8.33 | +1.97% |
| MRSH | $168.26 | +3.53% | 79.8B | 20.70 | $8.00 | +2.18% |
| AON | $338.98 | +4.03% | 70.8B | 18.19 | $18.23 | +0.93% |
| AJG | $222.50 | +4.70% | 55.7B | 35.11 | $6.18 | +1.25% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | N/A |
| WTW | $266.13 | +3.10% | 24.7B | 15.34 | $17.02 | +1.43% |
| BRO | $60.95 | +5.07% | 20B | 19.25 | $3.07 | +1.10% |
| ERIE | $232.87 | +4.08% | 10.6B | 20.94 | $10.92 | +2.48% |
| CRVL | $61.90 | +3.37% | 3.1B | 28.56 | $2.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLQT vs MMC Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while MMC trades at $182.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check MMC's competition here
SLQT vs MRSH Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while MRSH trades at $168.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check MRSH's competition here
SLQT vs AON Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while AON trades at $338.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check AON's competition here
SLQT vs AJG Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while AJG trades at $222.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check AJG's competition here
SLQT vs WLTW Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check WLTW's competition here
SLQT vs WTW Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while WTW trades at $266.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WTW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check WTW's competition here
SLQT vs BRO Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while BRO trades at $60.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check BRO's competition here
SLQT vs ERIE Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while ERIE trades at $232.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check ERIE's competition here
SLQT vs CRVL Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while CRVL trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check CRVL's competition here
SLQT vs ARX Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while ARX trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check ARX's competition here
SLQT vs BRP Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check BRP's competition here
SLQT vs FANH Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check FANH's competition here
SLQT vs BWIN Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while BWIN trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -28.06. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check BWIN's competition here
SLQT vs CRD-A Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 532.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while CRD-A trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check CRD-A's competition here
SLQT vs CRD-B Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 509.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while CRD-B trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check CRD-B's competition here
SLQT vs TWFG Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while TWFG trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check TWFG's competition here
SLQT vs EHTH Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while EHTH trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check EHTH's competition here
SLQT vs ZBAO Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while ZBAO trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check ZBAO's competition here
SLQT vs GOCO Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while GOCO trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check GOCO's competition here
SLQT vs EZRA Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while EZRA trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check EZRA's competition here
SLQT vs RELI Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while RELI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check RELI's competition here
SLQT vs HUIZ Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 691.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while HUIZ trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check HUIZ's competition here
SLQT vs EZRAW Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check EZRAW's competition here
SLQT vs RELIW Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while RELIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check RELIW's competition here
SLQT vs TIRX Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while TIRX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check TIRX's competition here
SLQT vs GIWWW Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check GIWWW's competition here
SLQT vs MER Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while MER trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check MER's competition here
SLQT vs EFM Comparison June 2026
SLQT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLQT stands at 148.2M. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLQT is priced at $0.85, while EFM trades at $25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLQT currently has a P/E ratio of -84.05, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLQT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLQT is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLQT.Check EFM's competition here