Actua Corporation (ACTA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ACTA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTA | $1.00 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VRSK | $183.13 | +0.32% | 24B | 27.96 | $6.55 | +1.02% |
| TCGL | $172.84 | +0.00% | 3.5B | -5761.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| NTSK | $8.47 | -5.94% | 3.4B | -4.76 | -$1.78 | N/A |
| ZSQR | $10.40 | +0.68% | 64.7M | -3.69 | -$2.81 | N/A |
| GIFT | $0.92 | -0.97% | 31M | -2.84 | -$0.32 | N/A |
| ZTG | $1.81 | -25.20% | 21.3M | 18.00 | $0.10 | N/A |
| QCLS | $3.71 | -2.11% | 6.6M | -0.44 | -$8.49 | N/A |
| RPGL | $2.36 | +9.26% | 2.5K | 0.45 | $5.21 | N/A |
| PRGY | N/A | N/A | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ACTA vs VRSK Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while VRSK trades at $183.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VRSK's ROE of -21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check VRSK's competition here
ACTA vs TCGL Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while TCGL trades at $172.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check TCGL's competition here
ACTA vs NTSK Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while NTSK trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTSK's ROE of +31.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check NTSK's competition here
ACTA vs ZSQR Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, ZSQR has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while ZSQR trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSQR's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZSQR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is less volatile compared to ZSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check ZSQR's competition here
ACTA vs GIFT Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while GIFT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check GIFT's competition here
ACTA vs ZTG Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while ZTG trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check ZTG's competition here
ACTA vs QCLS Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while QCLS trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check QCLS's competition here
ACTA vs RPGL Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, RPGL has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while RPGL trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPGL's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RPGL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is less volatile compared to RPGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check RPGL's competition here
ACTA vs PRGY Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while PRGY trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ACTA has daily volatility of 6.83 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here
ACTA vs CRTN Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, CRTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while CRTN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRTN's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to CRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check CRTN's competition here
ACTA vs CSC Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while CSC trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to CSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check CSC's competition here
ACTA vs DWCH Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, DWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while DWCH trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DWCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to DWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check DWCH's competition here
ACTA vs DWRE Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while DWRE trades at $74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check DWRE's competition here
ACTA vs HDP Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, HDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while HDP trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HDP's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to HDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check HDP's competition here
ACTA vs CRA Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while CRA trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ACTA has daily volatility of 6.83 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here
ACTA vs XTLY Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, XTLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while XTLY trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XTLY's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to XTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check XTLY's competition here
ACTA vs IMPV Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, IMPV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while IMPV trades at $55.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IMPV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to IMPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check IMPV's competition here
ACTA vs RMGN Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, RMGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while RMGN trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RMGN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to RMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check RMGN's competition here
ACTA vs CALD Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, CALD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while CALD trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to CALD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check CALD's competition here
ACTA vs FUEL Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, FUEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while FUEL trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FUEL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to FUEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check FUEL's competition here
ACTA vs DST Comparison June 2026
ACTA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACTA stands at 0. In comparison, DST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ACTA is priced at $1.00, while DST trades at $83.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACTA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACTA's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACTA is more volatile compared to DST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACTA.Check DST's competition here