Cartesian, Inc. (CRTN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRTN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRTN | $0.40 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VRSK | $184.38 | +3.02% | 23.9B | 27.87 | $6.55 | +1.02% |
| NTSK | $8.73 | -7.43% | 3.6B | -5.06 | -$1.78 | N/A |
| TCGL | $172.84 | +0.00% | 3.5B | -5761.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ZSQR | $10.52 | +4.37% | 64.3M | -3.67 | -$2.81 | N/A |
| GIFT | $0.96 | +15.33% | 31.7M | -2.90 | -$0.32 | N/A |
| ZTG | $1.91 | -24.80% | 29.9M | 25.30 | $0.10 | N/A |
| QCLS | $3.77 | -0.26% | 6.7M | -0.45 | -$8.49 | N/A |
| RPGL | $2.41 | +8.33% | 2.3K | 0.41 | $5.21 | N/A |
| ACTA | $1.00 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRTN vs VRSK Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while VRSK trades at $184.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to VRSK's ROE of -21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check VRSK's competition here
CRTN vs NTSK Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while NTSK trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to NTSK's ROE of +31.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check NTSK's competition here
CRTN vs TCGL Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while TCGL trades at $172.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check TCGL's competition here
CRTN vs ZSQR Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, ZSQR has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while ZSQR trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSQR's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to ZSQR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to ZSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check ZSQR's competition here
CRTN vs GIFT Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while GIFT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check GIFT's competition here
CRTN vs ZTG Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while ZTG trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check ZTG's competition here
CRTN vs QCLS Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while QCLS trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check QCLS's competition here
CRTN vs RPGL Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, RPGL has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while RPGL trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPGL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to RPGL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to RPGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check RPGL's competition here
CRTN vs ACTA Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, ACTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while ACTA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to ACTA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to ACTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check ACTA's competition here
CRTN vs PRGY Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while PRGY trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRTN has daily volatility of 0.00 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here
CRTN vs CSC Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while CSC trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN and CSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSC's competition here
CRTN vs DWCH Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, DWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while DWCH trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to DWCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN and DWCH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWCH's competition here
CRTN vs DWRE Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while DWRE trades at $74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check DWRE's competition here
CRTN vs HDP Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, HDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while HDP trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to HDP's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN and HDP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDP's competition here
CRTN vs CRA Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while CRA trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to CRA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRTN has daily volatility of 0.00 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here
CRTN vs XTLY Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, XTLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while XTLY trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to XTLY's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to XTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check XTLY's competition here
CRTN vs IMPV Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, IMPV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while IMPV trades at $55.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to IMPV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN and IMPV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMPV's competition here
CRTN vs RMGN Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, RMGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while RMGN trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to RMGN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN and RMGN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RMGN's competition here
CRTN vs CALD Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, CALD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while CALD trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to CALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN and CALD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CALD's competition here
CRTN vs FUEL Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, FUEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while FUEL trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to FUEL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to FUEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check FUEL's competition here
CRTN vs DST Comparison June 2026
CRTN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTN stands at 0. In comparison, DST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTN is priced at $0.40, while DST trades at $83.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTN's ROE is -1.79%, compared to DST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTN is less volatile compared to DST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTN.Check DST's competition here