Netskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NTSK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while VRSK trades at $183.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to VRSK's ROE of -21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check VRSK's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while TCGL trades at $172.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check TCGL's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ZSQR has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while ZSQR trades at $10.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas ZSQR's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ZSQR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to ZSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ZSQR's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while GIFT trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check GIFT's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while ZTG trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ZTG's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while QCLS trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check QCLS's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RPGL has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while RPGL trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas RPGL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to RPGL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to RPGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check RPGL's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while DST trades at $83.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas DST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to DST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to DST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check DST's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ACTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while ACTA trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas ACTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to ACTA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is less volatile compared to ACTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check ACTA's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while PRGY trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NTSK has daily volatility of 3.02 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while CRTN trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas CRTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CRTN's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CRTN's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while CSC trades at $10.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CSC's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while DWCH trades at $13.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas DWCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to DWCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to DWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check DWCH's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while DWRE trades at $74.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check DWRE's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while HDP trades at $14.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas HDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to HDP's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to HDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check HDP's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while CRA trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CRA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NTSK has daily volatility of 3.02 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, XTLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while XTLY trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas XTLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to XTLY's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to XTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check XTLY's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IMPV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while IMPV trades at $55.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas IMPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to IMPV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to IMPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check IMPV's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RMGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while RMGN trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas RMGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to RMGN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to RMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check RMGN's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CALD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while CALD trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas CALD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to CALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to CALD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check CALD's competition here

NTSK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTSK stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FUEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTSK is priced at $8.65, while FUEL trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTSK currently has a P/E ratio of -5.06, whereas FUEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTSK's ROE is +31.50%, compared to FUEL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NTSK is more volatile compared to FUEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTSK.Check FUEL's competition here