Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check HIPO-WT's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while FNF trades at $47.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check FNF's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while AIZ trades at $259.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check AIZ's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while FAF trades at $66.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check FAF's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while ACT trades at $42.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check ACT's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while MTG trades at $25.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check MTG's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while ESNT trades at $58.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check ESNT's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while RDN trades at $34.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check RDN's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while RYAN trades at $34.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check RYAN's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while NMIH trades at $36.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check NMIH's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while EIG trades at $46.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check EIG's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 967.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while TRUP trades at $23.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check TRUP's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 669.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while TIPT trades at $18.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -18.01. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check TIPT's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while HIPO trades at $26.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check HIPO's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 584.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while AMSF trades at $32.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check AMSF's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 467.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while ITIC trades at $251.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check ITIC's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while AMBC trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check AMBC's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 309.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while MBI trades at $6.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check MBI's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 280.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while AIFU trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIFU's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check AIFU's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 249.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while OSG trades at $5.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check OSG's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while JRVR trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check JRVR's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while ICCH trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check ICCH's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check AMBC-WT's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while PROS trades at $12.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check PROS's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while TIG trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check TIG's competition here

AGO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGO stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGO is priced at $76.44, while SNC trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.63, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AGO is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGO.Check SNC's competition here