ProSight Global, Inc. (PROS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PROS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROS | $12.85 | +0.00% | 0 | 2.03 | $6.33 | N/A |
| HIPO-WT | $0.62 | -6.37% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FNF | $47.87 | +1.74% | 12.8B | 16.97 | $2.81 | +4.21% |
| AIZ | $258.06 | +2.40% | 12.4B | 12.87 | $19.51 | +1.38% |
| FAF | $66.42 | +1.91% | 6.8B | 10.22 | $6.50 | +3.35% |
| ACT | $42.51 | +3.03% | 5.8B | 9.06 | $4.62 | +2.09% |
| MTG | $25.75 | +1.98% | 5.4B | 8.11 | $3.15 | +2.36% |
| ESNT | $58.67 | +3.24% | 5.3B | 8.22 | $7.03 | +2.30% |
| RDN | $34.63 | +3.19% | 4.6B | 7.98 | $4.29 | +2.99% |
| RYAN | $34.48 | +8.94% | 4.3B | 40.68 | $0.82 | +1.51% |
Stock Comparison
PROS vs HIPO-WT Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
PROS vs FNF Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while FNF trades at $47.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check FNF's competition here
PROS vs AIZ Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AIZ trades at $258.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AIZ's competition here
PROS vs FAF Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while FAF trades at $66.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check FAF's competition here
PROS vs ACT Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while ACT trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check ACT's competition here
PROS vs MTG Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while MTG trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check MTG's competition here
PROS vs ESNT Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while ESNT trades at $58.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check ESNT's competition here
PROS vs RDN Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while RDN trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check RDN's competition here
PROS vs RYAN Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while RYAN trades at $34.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check RYAN's competition here
PROS vs AGO Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AGO trades at $76.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AGO's competition here
PROS vs NMIH Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while NMIH trades at $36.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check NMIH's competition here
PROS vs EIG Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while EIG trades at $46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check EIG's competition here
PROS vs TRUP Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 967.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while TRUP trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check TRUP's competition here
PROS vs TIPT Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 669.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while TIPT trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is -18.01. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check TIPT's competition here
PROS vs HIPO Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 643.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while HIPO trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check HIPO's competition here
PROS vs AMSF Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 584.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AMSF trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AMSF's competition here
PROS vs ITIC Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 467.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while ITIC trades at $252.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check ITIC's competition here
PROS vs AMBC Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AMBC's competition here
PROS vs MBI Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 309.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while MBI trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check MBI's competition here
PROS vs AIFU Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 280.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AIFU trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIFU's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AIFU's competition here
PROS vs OSG Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 249.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while OSG trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check OSG's competition here
PROS vs JRVR Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while JRVR trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check JRVR's competition here
PROS vs ICCH Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check ICCH's competition here
PROS vs AMBC-WT Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check AMBC-WT's competition here
PROS vs TIG Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check TIG's competition here
PROS vs SNC Comparison June 2026
PROS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PROS stands at 0. In comparison, SNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PROS is priced at $12.85, while SNC trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PROS currently has a P/E ratio of 2.03, whereas SNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PROS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PROS is more volatile compared to SNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PROS.Check SNC's competition here